Dataset Information

Gender specific considerations in septorhinoplasty, a retrospective observational study and review of the literature

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

In our service experience, we found we had a high proportion of male patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. This encouraged us to research gender specific differences in anatomy, surgical techniques, expectations and outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who have had rhinoplasty surgery under a single otolaryngology consultant with a special interest in rhinoplasty. Patient information and results of the 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey for Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty pre and post-surgery were collected.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean pre-operative symptom (29.31 vs 32.29 p = 0.559), change in symptom (23.25 vs 24.14 p = 0.827) or satisfaction scores (8.69 vs 7.29 p = 0.089) between male and female patients. A discussion on gender specific anatomical features and deformities is presented.

Conclusion

All patients reported improved symptoms and high levels of satisfaction. Careful patient counselling and patient-specific surgical planning help to achieve optimal outcomes. Highlights • Traumatic nasal bone injury is a common cause of cosmetic and functional issues seen in the Otolaryngology outpatients.• Limited research exists on male rhinoplasty despite its growing popularity.• Knowledge of individual anatomical variations and surgical technique is key to providing personalised patient care.• Careful patient counselling and patient specific surgical planning help to achieve optimal outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Gillanders S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9206907 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThere is a lack of agreement regarding the types of lesions and clinical conditions that should be included in the term "geographic atrophy." Varied and conflicting views prevail throughout the literature and are currently used by retinal experts and other health care professionals.MethodsWe reviewed the nominal definition of the term "geographic atrophy" and conducted a search of the ophthalmologic literature focusing on preceding terminologies and the first citations of the term "geographic atrophy" secondary to age-related macular degeneration.ResultsAccording to the nominal definition, the term "geography" stands for a detailed description of the surface features of a specific region, indicating its relative position. However, it does not necessarily imply that the borders of the region must be sharply demarcated or related to any anatomical structures. The term "geographical areas of atrophy" was initially cited in the 1960s in the ophthalmologic literature in the context of uveitic eye disease and shortly thereafter also for the description of variants of "senile macular degeneration." However, no direct explanation could be found in the literature as to why the terms "geographical" and "geographic" were chosen. Presumably the terms were used as the atrophic regions resembled the map of a continent or well-defined country borders on thematic geographical maps. With the evolution of the terminology, the commonly used adjunct "of the retinal pigment epithelium" was frequently omitted and solely the term "geographic atrophy" prevailed for the nonexudative late-stage of age-related macular degeneration itself. Along with the quantification of atrophic areas, based on different imaging modalities and the use of both manual and semiautomated approaches, various and inconsistent definitions for the minimal lesion diameter or size of atrophic lesions have also emerged.ConclusionReconsideration of the application of the term "geographic atrophy" in the context of age-related macular degeneration seems to be prudent given ongoing advances in multimodal retinal imaging technology with identification of various phenotypic characteristics, and the observation of atrophy development in eyes under antiangiogenic therapy.

Project description:BackgroundThe treatment results of the Ponseti method for arthrogrypotic clubfoot have been described in only a few case series. Further evaluations are necessary.MethodsChildren from two German paediatric orthopaedic hospitals with arthrogryposis-associated clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method between 2004 and 2011 and who were at least five years of age at their last follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. The endpoints were the clinical foot position, necessary surgeries during the follow-up period and radiological constellations. A comprehensive literature review was conducted after a systematic literature search.ResultsSeventeen patients (47% with amyoplasia [AP] and 53% with distal arthrogryposis [DA]) met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one feet were evaluated. The period between the treatment start and the last follow-up examination covered 8.9 ± 2.5 years. After the last cast removal within the initial Ponseti cast series, 74% of the clinical results were good to excellent. However, the clinical outcomes in the patients with AP were significantly worse. Overall, in 23 feet (74%), at least one major surgery at the age of 2.9 ± 2.2 years was necessary during the clinical course. Major surgeries were much more frequent on the feet of the patients with AP than with DA. Lateral X-rays showed normal age-appropriate radiological angles in 4% of the feet, hindfoot equinus in 19%, under-corrected hindfoot in 44%, under-corrected clubfoot in 26% and rocker bottom deformity in 7%. The radiological residual deformities in AP were much more severe than in DA (p = 0.042). Most of the studies reviewed (11 case series, 144 patients) reported high initial clinical correction rates, followed by high recurrence rates and the need for further surgeries.ConclusionAbout a quarter of the arthrogrypotic patients benefited from the Ponseti therapy without further major surgery. However, the clinically observed high initial correction rate after Ponseti therapy of arthrogrypotic clubfoot was not accompanied by a correction of the bony foot position in the X-rays. The feet of the patients with DA had better outcomes than those of the patients with AP. Therefore, in outcome studies, a clear distinction between patients with AP and those with DA is necessary.