Dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with asthma and blood eosinophils ≥500 cells·µL-1.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Rabe KF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9218240 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with asthma and blood eosinophils ≥500 cells·µL<sup>-1</sup>.
Rabe Klaus F KF Pavord Ian D ID Castro Mario M Wechsler Michael E ME Daizadeh Nadia N Kapoor Upender U Ortiz Benjamin B Radwan Amr A Johnson Robert R RR Rowe Paul J PJ Deniz Yamo Y Jacob-Nara Juby A JA
The European respiratory journal 20220623 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionElevated neutrophil counts in blood, sputum, or lung have been associated with poor clinical outcomes and more severe disease in patients with type 2 asthma. In the phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (NCT02414854), add-on dupilumab 200 and 300 mg every 2 weeks compared with matched placebo significantly reduced severe asthma exacerbations and improved forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma. This post hoc analysis explored the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with type 2 asthma enrolled in QUEST with or without elevated blood neutrophil counts.MethodsAnnualized severe exacerbation rates during the 52-week treatment period and least-squares mean change from baseline in FEV1 over time were evaluated for patients with elevated type 2 biomarkers at baseline (blood eosinophils ≥ 150 cells/µL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ≥ 20 ppb; and eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/µL or FeNO ≥ 50 ppb) and low (<4,000 cells/µL) or high (≥4,000 cells/µL) neutrophil counts.ResultsDupilumab significantly reduced annualized severe exacerbation rates compared with placebo during the 52-week treatment period in patients with elevated type 2 biomarkers, irrespective of baseline neutrophil count (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Significant improvements in FEV1 versus placebo were observed as early as Week 2 and over the 52-week treatment period, irrespective of baseline neutrophil count (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Safety findings were similar across all subgroups, regardless of neutrophil counts at baseline.ConclusionsDupilumab treatment significantly reduced annualized severe exacerbation rates and improved lung function in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe, type 2 asthma, irrespective of baseline blood neutrophil count. This trial is registered with NCT02414854.
| S-EPMC10602700 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Eosinophils subtypes as lung-resident (rEOS) and inflammatory (iEOS) eosinophils are different in surface protein expression, functions, response to IL-5 and localization in lungs. rEOS- and iEOS-like eosinophils are found in blood; thus, we aimed to investigate their quantity and survivability in asthma patients. A total of 40 individuals were included: 10 steroid-free non-severe allergic asthma (AA), and 18 severe non-allergic eosinophilic asthma (SNEA) patients, the control group consisted of 12 healthy non-smoking subjects (HS). A bronchial challenge with Dermatophagoidespteronysinnus allergen was performed for AA patients and HS. Blood eosinophils subtyping was completed with magnetic beads' conjugated antibodies against surface CD62L. Eosinophils adhesion to hTERT airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells was measured by evaluating their peroxidase activity and viability by annexin V and propidium iodide staining. We found that the predominant blood eosinophil subtype in AA patients was iEOS, while rEOS prevailed in SNEA patients (p < 0.05). Moreover, rEOS demonstrated higher adhesion intensity compared with iEOS in all investigated groups. Both eosinophils subtypes of SNEA patients had higher survivability over the AA group. However, iEOS survivability from AA and SNEA groups was higher compared with rEOS under standard conditions, when rEOS survivability increased after their incubation with ASM cells. Bronchial allergen challenge abolished the dominance of blood iEOS in AA patients and prolonged only iEOS survivability. Though the challenge did not affect the adhesion of any eosinophils subtypes, the direct dependence of rEOS and iEOS survivability on their interaction with ASM cells was revealed (p < 0.05). These findings provide the premise for eosinophils subtype-oriented asthma treatment.
| S-EPMC7291159 | biostudies-literature
Project description:No head-to-head trials have compared the efficacy and safety between the licensed dosage and administration dosage of dupilumab and benralizumab for inadequately controlled asthma. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison to estimate differences in the efficacy and safety between dupilumab and benralizumab for inadequately controlled asthma using the Bayesian approach. The primary efficacy endpoint was annual exacerbation rate (AER). A subgroup analysis by blood eosinophil count was also performed. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of any adverse events (AAEs). The results demonstrate that there was no significant difference in the AER between dupilumab and benralizumab in overall patients and the subgroup with the blood eosinophil count of <150. However, the AER was significantly lower in the dupilumab group than in the benralizumab group in the subgroup with a blood eosinophil count of ≥150 but <300, and ≥300 with the rate ratio and 95% credible interval of 0.51 (0.29-0.92) and 0.58 (0.39-0.84), respectively. There was no significant difference in the AAEs between the dupilumab and benralizumab groups. This indirect treatment comparison indicates that dupilumab is superior to benralizumab in patients with inadequately controlled asthma having higher blood eosinophil counts. A direct comparison is required to provide definitive evidence. Systematic Review Registration: UMIN-CTR no. UMIN000036256.
| S-EPMC7037967 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha subunit of the interleukin-4 receptor and inhibits the signaling of IL-4 and IL-13. It is approved for treating asthma and other type-2 inflammatory diseases. There is a conflict in the literature regarding the safety and efficacy of dupilumab. Thus, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with moderate to severe asthma. Methods: Six databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov registry) were searched until January 2022. We included randomized controlled trials that compared dupilumab with the placebo in moderate to severe asthma patients. We extracted the data at 12 and 24 weeks and analyzed them using review manager 5.4. Findings: Thirteen trials were included. Dupilumab significantly improved the forced expiratory volume in 1 s, asthma control questionnaire score, the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide level, and immunoglobulin E level at 12 and 24 weeks (p < 0.05). However, it was associated with increased blood eosinophils at 12 and 24 weeks. Dupilumab was generally a safe agent for asthmatic patients. It showed no significant difference compared with the placebo regarding most adverse events. Conclusion: Dupilumab improves pulmonary function and reduces local and systemic inflammatory markers with minimal adverse events in patients with moderate to severe asthma.
| S-EPMC9574251 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Dermatophytosis are the most common fungal infections globally. Terbinafine is considered to have good potency against dermatophytes, but resistance to terbinafine is on the rise.The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of terbinafine 500 mg given once daily in treatment of patients with superficial dermatophytosis.It was a retrospective questionnaire-based survey. Each doctor was given survey questionnaire booklet containing survey forms. Clinical response was graded according to the improvement in the affected lesion. Mycological cure was defined as negative microscopy under potassium hydroxide examination and a negative culture in Sabouraud's dextrose agar. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the duration of therapy, Group A - terbinafine 500 mg for 2 weeks, Group B - terbinafine 500 mg for 4 weeks, and Group C - terbinafine 500 mg for 6 weeks.Total 50 doctors completed the survey involving 440 patients. In Group A, out of 194 patients, 87% (n = 169) patients showed very good response. In Group B, out of 211 patients, 92% (n = 194) of the patients showed very good response with >75% improvement in their lesion. In Group C, out of 35 patients, 80% (n = 30) patients showed very good response. Adverse drug reactions of mild to moderate intensity related to terbinafine were seen in 57 patients.Our survey indicates that terbinafine in a dose of 500 mg given once daily was efficacious and safe in the treatment of patients with dermatophytosis.
| S-EPMC5527721 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionDupilumab, a fully human anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, inhibits signaling of both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, which are key drivers of type 2-mediated inflammation. Dupilumab is approved in the EU, USA, and other countries for the treatment of adults with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Following positive phase 2 results in asthma, the phase 3 Liberty Asthma QUEST trial was initiated to provide further evidence for dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma.MethodsLiberty Asthma QUEST is a phase 3, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (NCT02414854) in patients with persistent asthma who are receiving continuous treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus one or two other asthma controller medicines. A total of 1902 patients (aged ≥ 12 years) were randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive 52 weeks of add-on therapy with subcutaneously administered dupilumab 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks or matched placebo. The study consisted of a 4 ± 1-week screening period, 52-week randomized treatment period, and 12-week post-treatment follow-up period. All patients continued to receive their prescribed ICS plus up to two additional controller medications. The primary efficacy endpoints were annualized rate of severe exacerbation events during the 52-week treatment period and absolute change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 at week 12.ConclusionUncontrolled asthma patients with persistent symptoms represent a population of significant unmet need, for whom new treatments are required. Patients with severe asthma are at high risk of asthma exacerbations, and face an accelerated decline in lung function and impaired quality of life. QUEST examines the efficacy of dupilumab in this at-risk patient population; it is the largest placebo-controlled study in uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma with a biologic agent to date, and the only phase 3 study of a biologic therapy of asthma that enrolled patients irrespective of baseline type 2 inflammatory biomarker levels.FundingSanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. CLINICAL TRIALS.Gov identifierNCT02414854.
| S-EPMC5960488 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Different eosinophil subpopulations have been identified in asthma and other eosinophilic disorders. However, there is a paucity of data on eosinophil subpopulations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to compare eosinophil phenotypes in blood and induced sputum in patients with COPD, asthma and controls. Stable patients with mild-to-moderate COPD (n = 15) and asthma (n = 14) with documented blood eosinophilia ≥100 cells/µL in the year prior to the study and the control group (n = 11) were included to the study. The blood and sputum eosinophil phenotypes were analyzed by flow cytometry. IL-5, IL-13, CCL5 and eotaxin-3 levels were measured in the induced sputum. The marker expression on blood eosinophils was similar among control, asthma and COPD groups. The expressions of CD125, CD193, CD14 and CD62L were higher on blood than on sputum eosinophils in all three groups. We found increased levels of CD193+ and CD66b+ sputum eosinophils from COPD patients, and an elevated level of CD11b+ sputum eosinophils in asthma compared to COPD patients. The results of our study suggest that the profile of marker expression on COPD sputum eosinophils differed from other groups, suggesting a distinct phenotype of eosinophils of COPD patients than in asthma or healthy subjects.
| S-EPMC10297077 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8360078 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8836244 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeLong-term data are limited on the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma from Korea. The current subgroup analysis was designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients enrolled from Korean centers in the parent studies (phase 2b and QUEST) and who participated in the TRAVERSE open-label extension (OLE) study.MethodsTRAVERSE was a global, multicenter, OLE study that assessed the safety and efficacy of dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks in patients (n = 2,282) with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma who completed prior dupilumab asthma clinical trials. The primary outcome was the incidence of any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the secondary outcomes included annualized severe exacerbation rate, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1), and 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score.ResultsSafety outcomes were consistent with the parent studies and the overall TRAVERSE population; out of 74 patients, 70 experienced ≥ 1 TEAE, and 6 (8.1%) discontinued because of adverse events. During the treatment period, the unadjusted annualized severe exacerbation rate was low (0.470). Improvement in pre-BD FEV1 was seen as early as Week 2 with a mean change from the parent study baseline (PSBL), standard deviation (SD) of 0.42 L (0.47), which was sustained until Week 96. Mean change from PSBL (SD) in ACQ-5 score was -1.32 (0.76) at Week 48.ConclusionsThis subgroup analysis of TRAVERSE showed the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma enrolled from Korean centers.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02134028.
| S-EPMC11331194 | biostudies-literature