Dataset Information

Context-Dependent Effects Explain Divergent Prognostic Roles of Tregs in Cancer

ABSTRACT:

Simple Summary

Immune cells play an important role in cancer, with regard to classification, diagnostic or prognostic matters. In particular, we focused on the prognostic value of Tregs in this meta-analysis. We took into account the local context and their heterogeneity in order to solve their apparent ambiguous role. We used three proxies to recapitulate the complexity of the context: the neighboring cell, the tissue and the quantification method; and we carefully dissected the regulatory population into existing subsets. We showed that CD45RO

Abstract

Assessing cancer prognosis is a challenging task, given the heterogeneity of the disease. Multiple features (clinical, environmental, genetic) have been used for such assessments. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is a key feature, and describing the impact of its many components on cancer prognosis is an active field of research. The complexity of the tumor microenvironment context makes it difficult to use the TIME to assess prognosis, as demonstrated by the example of regulatory T cells (Tregs). The effect of Tregs on prognosis is ambiguous, with different studies considering them to be negative, positive or neutral. We focused on five different cancer types (breast, colorectal, gastric, lung and ovarian). We clarified the definition of Tregs and their utility for assessing cancer prognosis by taking the context into account via the following parameters: the Treg subset, the anatomical location of these cells, and the neighboring cells. With a meta-analysis on these three parameters, we were able to clarify the prognostic role of Tregs. We found that CD45RO

SUBMITTER: Amblard E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9221270 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionMany human breast cancers overexpress the E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2 and its homolog MDMX. Expression of MDM2 and MDMX occurs in estrogen receptor α-positive (ERα+) breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). There are p53-independent influences of MDM2 and MDMX, and 80% of TNBC express mutant p53 (mtp53). MDM2 drives TNBC circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in mice, but the context-dependent influences of MDM2 and MDMX on different subtypes of breast cancers expressing mtp53 have not been determined.MethodsTo assess the context-dependent roles, we carried out MDM2 and MDMX knockdown in orthotopic tumors of TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells expressing mtp53 R280K and MDM2 knockdown in ERα+ T47D cells expressing mtp53 L194F. The corresponding cell proliferation was scored in vitro by growth curves and in vivo by orthotopic tumor volumes. Cell migration was assessed in vitro by wound-healing assays and cell intravasation in vivo by sorting GFP-positive CTCs by flow cytometry. The metastasis gene targets were determined by an RT-PCR array card screen and verified by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis.ResultsKnocking down MDMX or MDM2 in MDA-MB-231 cells reduced cell migration and CTC detection, but only MDMX knockdown reduced tumor volumes at early time points. This is the first report of MDMX overexpression in TNBC enhancing the CTC phenotype with correlated upregulation of CXCR4. Experiments were carried out to compare MDM2-knockdown outcomes in nonmetastatic ERα+ T47D cells. The knockdown of MDM2 in ERα+ T47D orthotopic tumors decreased primary tumor volumes, supporting our previous finding that estrogen-activated MDM2 increases cell proliferation.ConclusionsThis is the first report showing that the expression of MDM2 in ERα+ breast cancer and TNBC can result in different tumor-promoting outcomes. Both MDMX and MDM2 overexpression in TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells enhanced the CTC phenotype. These data indicate that both MDM2 and MDMX can promote TNBC metastasis and that it is important to consider the context-dependent roles of MDM2 family members in different subtypes of breast cancer.

Project description:BackgroundThe mutation status of the BRAF and KRAS genes has been proposed as prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer. Of them, only the BRAF V600E mutation has been validated independently as prognostic for overall survival and survival after relapse, while the prognostic value of KRAS mutation is still unclear. We investigated the prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations in various contexts defined by stratifications of the patient population.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer from the PETACC-3 clinical trial (N?=?1,423), by assessing the prognostic value of the BRAF and KRAS mutations in subpopulations defined by all possible combinations of the following clinico-pathological variables: T stage, N stage, tumor site, tumor grade and microsatellite instability status. In each such subpopulation, the prognostic value was assessed by log rank test for three endpoints: overall survival, relapse-free survival, and survival after relapse. The significance level was set to 0.01 for Bonferroni-adjusted p-values, and a second threshold for a trend towards statistical significance was set at 0.05 for unadjusted p-values. The significance of the interactions was tested by Wald test, with significance level of 0.05.ResultsIn stage II-III colorectal cancer, BRAF mutation was confirmed a marker of poor survival only in subpopulations involving microsatellite stable and left-sided tumors, with higher effects than in the whole population. There was no evidence for prognostic value in microsatellite instable or right-sided tumor groups. We found that BRAF was also prognostic for relapse-free survival in some subpopulations. We found no evidence that KRAS mutations had prognostic value, although a trend was observed in some stratifications. We also show evidence of heterogeneity in survival of patients with BRAF V600E mutation.ConclusionsThe BRAF mutation represents an additional risk factor only in some subpopulations of colorectal cancers, in others having limited prognostic value. However, in the subpopulations where it is prognostic, it represents a marker of much higher risk than previously considered. KRAS mutation status does not seem to represent a strong prognostic variable.

Dataset Information

Context-Dependent Effects Explain Divergent Prognostic Roles of Tregs in Cancer

Simple Summary

Abstract

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets