Dataset Information

On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To determine the proportions of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours that are negative and that contain an incidentaloma, and to explore temporal changes and determinants.

Methods

This study included 1615 US examinations that were done during on-call hours at a tertiary care center between 2005 and 2017.

Results

The total proportion of negative US examinations was 49.2% (795/1615). The total proportion of US examinations with an incidentaloma was 8.0% (130/1615). There were no significant temporal changes in either one of these proportions. The likelihood of a negative US examination was significantly higher when requested by anesthesiology [odds ratio (OR) 2.609, P = 0.011], or when the indication for US was focused on gallbladder and biliary ducts (OR 1.556, P = 0.007), transplant (OR 2.371, P = 0.005), trauma (OR 3.274, P < 0.001), or urolithiasis/postrenal obstruction (OR 3.366, P < 0.001). In contrast, US examinations were significantly less likely to be negative when requested by urology (OR 0.423, P = 0.014), or when the indication for US was acute oncology (OR 0.207, P = 0.045) or appendicitis (OR 0.260, P < 0.001). The likelihood of an incidentaloma on US was significantly higher in older patients (OR 1.020 per year of age increase, P < 0.001) or when the liver was evaluated with US (OR 3.522, P < 0.001).

Discussion

Nearly 50% of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours are negative, and 8% reveal an incidentaloma. Requesting specialty and indication for US affect the likelihood of a negative examination, and higher patient age and liver evaluations increase the chance of detecting an incidentaloma in this setting. These data may potentially be used to improve clinical reasoning and restrain overutilization of imaging.

SUBMITTER: Sluijter TE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9226090 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center.

Sluijter Tim E TE Yakar Derya D Kwee Thomas C TC

Abdominal radiology (New York) 20220429 7

<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine the proportions of abdominal US examinations during on-call hours that are negative and that contain an incidentaloma, and to explore temporal changes and determinants.<h4>Methods</h4>This study included 1615 US examinations that were done during on-call hours at a tertiary care center between 2005 and 2017.<h4>Results</h4>The total proportion of negative US examinations was 49.2% (795/1615). The total proportion of US examinations with an incidentaloma was 8.0% ( ...[more]

PMID: 35486165

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesUltrasound is the first-line imaging modality of the pelvis in the pediatric and adolescent gynecology (PAG) population. Ultrasound findings in pre- and postpubertal PAG patients differ from those in adults. Diagnostic models for adnexal pathology have not been validated in this cohort. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate normative findings and the incidence of pathology in this cohort. The secondary aim was to assess the performance of expert opinion alone, as well as using retrospective application of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules (SRs) and benign descriptors (BDs) in those found to have an adnexal mass.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of pelvic ultrasound examinations performed in patients < 18 years of age from January 2017 to July 2021 in one expert center in the UK. Analysis was performed on three age groups: neonatal (aged < 1 year), premenarchal (aged ≥ 1 year) and postmenarchal. The study was locally approved as an audit (GRM_082). Expert review of images of ovarian masses was performed using retrospective application of the IOTA-SRs and IOTA-BDs.ResultsIn total, data on 1429 pelvic ultrasound examinations were retrieved, of which 116 were excluded, resulting in the inclusion of 1313 ultrasound images (1145 patients). The median age at the first ultrasound scan was 2 days after birth in the neonatal group (n = 20), 8.8 years in the premenarchal group (n = 124) and 16.1 years in the postmenarchal group (n = 961). The status of menarche was unknown in a further 40 patients. Normative ultrasound findings were in keeping with those in the existing literature. Uterine anomalies were seen in 14 (1.2%) patients. Endometrial pathology was rare, with five cases of gestational trophoblastic disease. The most frequent indication for ultrasound scan for each group were a known medical condition in neonates (n = 11 (55.0%)), suspected precocious puberty in premenarchal girls (n = 38 (30.6%)) and abnormal vaginal bleeding in postmenarchal girls (n = 504 (52.4%)). Polycystic ovarian appearances were described in 150 (15.6%) postmenarchal girls. Adnexal pathology was identified in 102 (8.9%) participants on initial ultrasound: four neonates, three premenarchal and 95 postmenarchal patients. Benign cystadenomas and hemorrhagic cysts were the most common adnexal mass type in all groups. Final outcomes were available for 79/95 masses in the postmenarchal group, none of which were malignant. The IOTA-SRs, IOTA-BDs, expert opinion and standard ultrasound reporting could characterize as benign 96.2%, 87.3%, 98.7% and 77.2% of the masses, respectively, all with a specificity of 100%. Eleven patients underwent 12 surgeries overall (three oophorectomies, six cystectomies and three cyst aspirations), with 11 out of 12 masses classified as benign based on retrospective expert assessment.ConclusionsUltrasound is effective for assessment of the female pelvis in the PAG population. Adnexal masses are common, but few require surgical intervention and most resolve expectantly. The IOTA-BDs and IOTA-SRs maintain their performance in this population. Larger studies are required for the prospective validation of diagnostic models which may aid a fertility-sparing approach to care. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the frequency, determinants, clinical implications, and costs of recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) in secondary interpretations of abdominal imaging examinations.MethodsThis retrospective study included 2225 abdominal imaging examinations from outside institutions that were reinterpreted as part of standard clinical care at a tertiary care center in a one-year time frame.ResultsTwo hundred forty-six RAIs were present in 231 of 2225 reports (10.4%) of secondary abdominal imaging interpretations. Patient age and experience of the radiologist who performed the secondary interpretation were independently significantly associated with the presence of an RAI (both p = 0.002), with odds ratios of 0.99 per year increase in patient age (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.00) and 1.06 per year increase in experience of the radiologist (95% CI, 1.02-1.10). If followed, RAIs changed clinical management in 31.2%. Total costs of all 246 RAIs, whether performed or not by the referring physicians, amounted to €71,032.21, thus resulting in €31.92 per secondary abdominal imaging interpretation. Total costs of the 140 RAIs that were actually performed by the referring physicians amounted to €42,683.08, resulting in €19.18 per secondary abdominal imaging interpretation.ConclusionsThe frequency of RAIs in reports of secondary interpretations of abdominal imaging examinations (which appear to be affected by patients' age and radiologists' experience) and associated costs are non-negligible. However, RAIs not infrequently change clinical management. The presented data may be helpful to radiology departments and healthcare policy makers to make well-informed decisions on the value and facilitation of the practice of secondary interpretations.Key points• Frequency of recommendations for additional imaging (RAIs) in secondary interpretations of abdominal imaging examinations at a tertiary care center is approximately 10.4%. • RAIs appear to be more frequently issued in younger patients and by more experienced radiologists, and if followed by referring clinicians, change clinical management in about one third of cases. • RAI costs per secondary interpretation in the Dutch Healthcare system are €31.92 (considering all RAIs) or €19.18 (considering only those RAIs that are actually performed).

Dataset Information

On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

On-call abdominal ultrasonography: the rate of negative examinations and incidentalomas in a European tertiary care center.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets