Dataset Information

Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are common. MPE causes significant breathlessness and impairs quality of life. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) allow ambulatory drainage and reduce hospital days and re-intervention rates when compared to standard talc slurry pleurodesis. Daily drainage accelerates pleurodesis, and talc instillation via the IPC has been proven feasible and safe. Surgical pleurodesis via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered a one-off intervention for MPE and is often recommended to patients who are fit for surgery. The AMPLE-3 trial is the first randomised trial to compare IPC (±talc pleurodesis) and VATS pleurodesis in those who are fit for surgery.

Methods and analysis

A multi-centre, open-labelled randomised trial of patients with symptomatic MPE, expected survival of ≥ 6 months and good performance status randomised 1:1 to either IPC or VATS pleurodesis. Participant randomisation will be minimised for (i) cancer type (mesothelioma vs non-mesothelioma); (ii) previous pleurodesis (vs not); and (iii) trapped lung, if known (vs not). Primary outcome is the need for further ipsilateral pleural interventions over 12 months or until death, if sooner. Secondary outcomes include days in hospital, quality of life (QoL) measures, physical activity levels, safety profile, health economics, adverse events, and survival. The trial will recruit 158 participants who will be followed up for 12 months.

Ethics and dissemination

Sir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group (HREC) has approved the study (reference: RGS356). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.

Discussion

Both IPC and VATS are commonly used procedures for MPE. The AMPLE-3 trial will provide data to help define the merits and shortcomings of these procedures and inform future clinical care algorithms.

Trial registration

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12618001013257 . Registered on 18 June 2018.

Protocol version

Version 3.00/4.02.19.

SUBMITTER: Fitzgerald DB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9235203 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.

Fitzgerald Deirdre B DB Sidhu Calvin C Budgeon Charley C Tan Ai Ling AL Read Catherine A CA Kwan Benjamin C H BCH Smith Nicola Ann NA Fysh Edward T ET Muruganandan Sanjeevan S Saghaie Tajalli T Shrestha Ranjan R Badiei Arash A Nguyen Phan P Burke Andrew A Goddard John J Windsor Morgan M McDonald Julie J Wright Gavin G Czarnecka Kasia K Sivakumar Parthipan P Yasufuku Kazuhiro K Feller-Kopman David J DJ Maskell Nick A NA Murray Kevin K Lee Y C Gary YCG

Trials 20220627 1

<h4>Introduction</h4>Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are common. MPE causes significant breathlessness and impairs quality of life. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) allow ambulatory drainage and reduce hospital days and re-intervention rates when compared to standard talc slurry pleurodesis. Daily drainage accelerates pleurodesis, and talc instillation via the IPC has been proven feasible and safe. Surgical pleurodesis via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered a one-off ...[more]

PMID: 35761341

Similar Datasets

Project description:Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and their families. Various treatment strategies exist for the management of malignant effusions, though there is no consensus governing the best choice. Talc pleurodesis is the conventional management but requires hospitalisation (and substantial healthcare resources), can cause significant side effects, and has a suboptimal success rate. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) allow ambulatory fluid drainage without hospitalisation, and are increasingly employed for management of malignant effusions. Previous studies have only investigated the length of hospital care immediately related to IPC insertion. Whether IPC management reduces time spent in hospital in the patients' remaining lifespan is unknown. A strategy of malignant effusion management that reduces hospital admission days will allow patients to spend more time outside hospital, reduce costs and save healthcare resources.The Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial is a multicentred, randomised trial designed to compare IPC with talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusion. This study will randomise 146 adults with malignant pleural effusions (1:1) to IPC management or talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary end point is the total number of days spent in hospital (for any admissions) from treatment procedure to death or end of study follow-up. Secondary end points include hospital days specific to pleural effusion management, adverse events, self-reported symptom and quality-of-life scores.The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study as have the ethics boards of all the participating hospitals. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12611000567921; National Institutes of Health-NCT02045121.

Project description:ImportanceIndwelling pleural catheter and talc pleurodesis are established treatments for malignant pleural effusions among patients with poor prognosis.ObjectiveTo determine whether indwelling pleural catheters are more effective than talc pleurodesis in reducing total hospitalization days in the remaining lifespan of patients with malignant pleural effusion.Design, setting, and participantsThis open-label, randomized clinical trial included participants recruited from 9 centers in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Hong Kong between July 2012 and October 2014; they were followed up for 12 months (study end date: October 16, 2015). Patients (n = 146) with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion who had not undergone indwelling pleural catheter or pleurodesis treatment were included.InterventionsParticipants were randomized (1:1) to indwelling pleural catheter (n = 74) or talc pleurodesis (n = 72), minimized by malignancy (mesothelioma vs others) and trapped lung (vs not), and stratified by region (Australia vs Asia).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was the total number of days spent in hospital from procedure to death or to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included further pleural interventions, patient-reported breathlessness, quality-of-life measures, and adverse events.ResultsAmong the 146 patients who were randomized (median age, 70.5 years; 56.2% male), 2 withdrew before receiving the randomized intervention and were excluded. The indwelling pleural catheter group spent significantly fewer days in hospital than the pleurodesis group (median, 10.0 [interquartile range [IQR], 3-17] vs 12.0 [IQR, 7-21] days; P = .03; Hodges-Lehmann estimate of difference, 2.92 days; 95% CI, 0.43-5.84). The reduction was mainly in effusion-related hospitalization days (median, 1.0 [IQR, 1-3] day with the indwelling pleural catheter vs 4.0 (IQR, 3-6) days with pleurodesis; P < .001; Hodges-Lehmann estimate, 2.06 days; 95% CI, 1.53-2.58). Fewer patients randomized to indwelling pleural catheter required further ipsilateral invasive pleural drainages (4.1% vs 22.5%; difference, 18.4%; 95% CI, 7.7%-29.2%). There were no significant differences in improvements in breathlessness or quality of life offered by indwelling pleural catheter or talc pleurodesis. Adverse events were seen in 22 patients in the indwelling pleural catheter group (30 events) and 13 patients in the pleurodesis group (18 events).Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients with malignant pleural effusion, treatment with an indwelling pleural catheter vs talc pleurodesis resulted in fewer hospitalization days from treatment to death, but the magnitude of the difference is of uncertain clinical importance. These findings may help inform patient choice of management for pleural effusion.Trial registrationanzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000567921.

Project description:BackgroundMalignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a debilitating condition as it commonly causes disabling breathlessness and impairs quality of life (QoL). Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) offers an effective alternative for the management of MPE. However, IPC-related infections remain a significant concern and there are currently no long-term strategies for their prevention. The Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-4 trial is a multicentre randomised trial that evaluates the use of topical mupirocin prophylaxis (vs no mupirocin) to reduce catheter-related infections in patients with MPE treated with an IPC.MethodsA pragmatic, multi-centre, open-labelled, randomised trial. Eligible patients with MPE and an IPC will be randomised 1:1 to either regular topical mupirocin prophylaxis or no mupirocin (standard care). For the interventional arm, topical mupirocin will be applied around the IPC exit-site after each drainage, at least twice weekly. Weekly follow-up via phone calls or in person will be conducted for up to 6 months. The primary outcome is the percentage of patients who develop an IPC-related (pleural, skin, or tract) infection between the time of catheter insertion and end of follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include analyses of infection (types and episodes), hospitalisation days, health economics, adverse events, and survival. Subject to interim analyses, the trial will recruit up to 418 participants.DiscussionResults from this trial will determine the efficacy of mupirocin prophylaxis in patients who require IPC for MPE. It will provide data on infection rates, microbiology, and potentially infection pathways associated with IPC-related infections.Ethics and disseminationSir Charles Gairdner and Osborne Park Health Care Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study (RGS0000005920). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.Trial registrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12623000253606. Registered on 9 March 2023.

Project description:BackgroundMalignant pleural effusion (MPE) affects approximately 150,000 patients in the United States each year and usually signifies advanced-stage cancer. The optimal treatment remains a challenge but indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) offer several advantages and may help achieve spontaneous pleurodesis (SP) in some patients.ObjectivesWe aim to investigate the predictors of SP among patients with MPE, particularly in a resource-limited community-based safety net hospital.DesignThis is a retrospective cohort study done at a community-based safety net hospital.MethodsAdults diagnosed with or suspected of having MPE between January 2015 and December 2023 who underwent IPC placement were included. Data was collected retrospectively from December 2023 to June 2024. Data encompassed demographics, imaging, post-procedural complications, pleural fluid analysis, oncology treatment history, and utilization of medical thoracoscopy without chemical pleurodesis (MTWCP) for diagnosis.ResultsA total of 173 patients underwent IPC insertion. Most of our patients were women (64.2%), and Latin American (65.9%), with a mean age of 55.3 years. The most common type of primary cancer was breast (28.9%) followed by lung (23.1%) and lymphoma (6.9%). Pleural fluid characteristics such as glucose, eosinophils, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), and protein concentration were not significantly associated with SP. Most patients had low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0-2 (64.6%) and low LENT (Lactate Dehydrogenase (L), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E) Performance Score, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (N), and Tumor type (T) score) scores of 0-4 (59%). Lower scores (better functional status) were significantly associated with SP. Post-IPC chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and immunotherapy were significantly associated with SP, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.295 (95% CI: 3.05-17.4, p = 0.001) and adjusted OR 6.261 (95% CI: 2.73-14.36, p = 0.001) respectively. MTWCP was also a predictor of SP with an adjusted OR of 4.031 (95% CI: 1.452-11.19, p = 0.007).ConclusionOur study is the first to assess predictors of SP in a resource-limited safety net hospital representing under-represented and underserved patients. We identify several factors associated with higher rates of SP such as higher functional status, MTWCP, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation post-IPC placement. The study findings can help clinicians consider IPC placement and guide them regarding the duration and possible complications of IPC. MTWCP appears to improve the success of SP. Further studies are needed to assess these findings further.

Dataset Information

Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.

Introduction

Methods and analysis

Ethics and dissemination

Discussion

Trial registration

Protocol version

Publications

Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets