Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background/objective

Osteoporosis is a global health concern with an increasing prevalence worldwide. Denosumab is an antiresoptive agent that has been demonstrated to be effective and safe in osteoporotic patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) to the originator product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, postmenopausal osteoporotic patients received 60 mg of subcutaneous Arylia or Prolia® at months 0, 6, and 12 and were followed up for 18 months. The primary endpoint was the noninferiority of the biosimilar product to the reference product in the percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) in 18 months at the lumbar spine (L₁-L₄), total hip, and femoral neck. The secondary endpoints were safety assessment, the incidence of new vertebral fractures, and the trend of bone turnover markers (BTMs).

Results

A total of 190 patients were randomized to receive either biosimilar (n = 95) or reference (n = 95) denosumab. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, the lower limits of the 95% two-sided confidence intervals of the difference between Arylia and Prolia® in increasing BMD were greater than the predetermined noninferiority margin of - 1.78 at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck sites (mean differences [95% CIs] of 0.39 [- 1.34 to 2.11], 0.04 [- 1.61 to 1.69], and 0.41 [- 1.58 to 2.40], respectively). The two products were also comparable in terms of safety, new vertebral fractures, and trend of BTMs.

Conclusion

The efficacy of the biosimilar denosumab was shown to be noninferior to that of the reference denosumab, with a comparable safety profile at 18 months.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03293108 ; Registration date: 2017-09-19.

SUBMITTER: Jamshidi A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9245232 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial.

Jamshidi Ahmadreza A Vojdanian Mahdi M Soroush Mohsen M Akbarian Mahmoud M Aghaei Mehrdad M Hajiabbasi Asghar A Mirfeizi Zahra Z Khabbazi Alireza A Alishiri Gholamhosein G Haghighi Anousheh A Salimzadeh Ahmad A Karimzadeh Hadi H Shirani Fatemeh F Fard Mohammad Reza Hatef MRH Nazarinia MohammadAli M Soroosh Soosan S Anjidani Nassim N Gharibdoost Farhad F

Arthritis research & therapy 20220630 1

<h4>Background/objective</h4>Osteoporosis is a global health concern with an increasing prevalence worldwide. Denosumab is an antiresoptive agent that has been demonstrated to be effective and safe in osteoporotic patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) to the originator product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.<h4>Methods</h4>In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, postmenopa ...[more]

PMID: 35773713

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundComplications of bone metastases such as skeletal-related events lead to the impaired functional status and quality of life including death in patients with bone metastasis from solid tumors. Denosumab (XGEVA®) is indicated for the prevention of skeletal-related events in bone metastasis patients with solid tumors. The biosimilar product LY01011, a fully human anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand monoclonal antibody, was developed to be compared with the reference product denosumab.Material and methodsA randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled phase 1 study was conducted in healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 168 enrolled subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 120 mg dose of LY01011 (n = 85) or denosumab (n = 83) subcutaneously. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0→t), were collected and measured for evaluation. Other secondary PK parameters included AUC0- ∞, Tmax, CL/F, λz, t1/2, Vd/F, etc. Pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and immunogenicity profiles were also accounted for data analysis.ResultsThe geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of LY01011 and denosumab for the primary PK parameters such as Cmax and AUC0→t were 98.13% and 100.32%. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within the acceptance range of 80%-125%. The GMRs of the PD parameters including AUEC0→t and Emax were 98.71% and 99.80%, which fell within the pre-defined acceptance range of 80%-125%. The results also demonstrated PK similarity even if Cmax and AUC0→∞ had been used as primary endpoints. Safety profiles were tolerable and similar between groups. 4 (4.7%) and 2 (2.4%) subjects had experienced Grade 3 or above treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in LY01011 group and denosumab group. 3 subjects were reported to have serious adverse events (SAEs). None of the Grade 3 or above TEAEs and SAEs were related to the study drug, LY01011. No subject was tested anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive in both groups prior to the study drug administration. Following the study drug administration, only one subject in denosumab group was tested ADA positive, whereas no subject with ADA positive was reported in LY01011 group. No neutralizing antibody (Nab) was detected in either group throughout the study.ConclusionsThe study demonstrated PK and PD similarity of LY01011, a denosumab biosimilar, to denosumab in healthy Chinese subjects, with comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles.

Project description:This 78-week (18-month) study conducted in 479 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 relative to US reference denosumab. CT-P41 had equivalent efficacy and pharmacodynamics to US-denosumab, with similar pharmacokinetics and comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles.PurposeTo demonstrate equivalence of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 and US reference denosumab (US-denosumab) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.MethodsThis 78-week (18-month), double-blind, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 study (NCT04757376) comprised two treatment periods (TPs). In TPI, patients (N = 479) were randomized 1:1 to 60 mg subcutaneous CT-P41 or US-denosumab. At Week 52, those who had received CT-P41 in TPI continued to do so. Those who had received US-denosumab were randomized (1:1) to continue treatment or switch to CT-P41 in TPII. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density at Week 52. Efficacy equivalence was concluded if associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for least squares (LS) mean group differences fell within ± 1.503%. The primary pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint was area under the effect curve for serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen through the first 26 weeks, with an equivalence margin of 80-125% (for 95% CIs associated with geometric LS mean ratios).ResultsEquivalence was demonstrated for CT-P41 and US-denosumab with respect to primary efficacy (LS mean difference [95% CI]: - 0.139 [- 0.826, 0.548] in the full analysis set and - 0.280 [- 0.973, 0.414] in the per-protocol set) and PD (geometric LS mean ratio [95% CI]: 94.94 [90.75, 99.32]) endpoints. Secondary efficacy, PD, pharmacokinetics, and safety results were comparable among all groups up to Week 78, including after transitioning to CT-P41 from US-denosumab.ConclusionsCT-P41 was equivalent to US-denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, with respect to primary efficacy and PD endpoints.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial.

Background/objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets