Dataset Information

Outcomes of Radiation Therapy Plus Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

With the integration of immunotherapy (IO) agents in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), there has been interest in the combined use with radiation therapy (RT). However, real world data are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with mRCC receiving both RT and IO compared with IO alone.

Methods and materials

Data were collected from Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System from January 2011 to September 2019 across 14 academic centers. Patients with mRCC who received IO as first- or second-line therapy were included. RT was categorized as radical dose or palliative dose. Kaplan-Meier estimates were reported for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure. Cox proportional hazard models were used adjusted for age and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk categories.

Results

In total, 505 patients were included in the study: 179 received RT + IO and 326 received IO alone. Two-year OS for the RT + IO group was 55.0% compared with 66.4% in the IO alone cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.38; P = .07). At 2 years, 12.2% of the RT + IO patients remained on therapy versus 30.9% in the IO alone group (aHR, 1.30; P = .02). For patients receiving first-line therapy, 2-year OS in the RT + IO group was 56.4% versus 78.4% in the IO alone arm, though this difference was not statistically significant (aHR, 1.23; P = .56). For patients receiving radical dose and palliative dose, 2-year OS was 57.0% and 53.9%, respectively (aHR, 0.86; P = .63).

Conclusions

In this descriptive analysis, more than one-third of patients with mRCC received RT and demonstrated inferior outcomes compared with IO alone. Potential explanations include greater presence of adverse metastatic sites in those receiving RT. Prospective clinical trials evaluating potential benefits of RT in an IO era remain an important need.

SUBMITTER: Nguyen EK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9260099 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul-Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Outcomes of Radiation Therapy Plus Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System.

Nguyen Eric K EK Lalani Aly Khan A AKA Ghosh Sunita S Basappa Naveen S NS Kapoor Anil A Hansen Aaron R AR Kollmannsberger Christian C Heng Daniel D Wood Lori A LA Castonguay Vincent V Soulières Denis D Winquist Eric E Canil Christina C Graham Jeffrey J Bjarnason Georg A GA Breau Rodney H RH Pouliot Frédéric F Swaminath Anand A

Advances in radiation oncology 20220116 4

<h4>Purpose</h4>With the integration of immunotherapy (IO) agents in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), there has been interest in the combined use with radiation therapy (RT). However, real world data are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with mRCC receiving both RT and IO compared with IO alone.<h4>Methods and materials</h4>Data were collected from Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System from January 2011 to September 2019 across 1 ...[more]

PMID: 35814860

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeImmunotherapy (IO) has significantly improved outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Preclinical evidence suggests that responses to IO may be potentiated via immunomodulatory effects of stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT). We hypothesized that clinical outcomes from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) would demonstrate improved overall survival (OS) in patients with mRCC receiving IO + SRT versus IO alone.Methods and materialsPatients with mRCC receiving first-line IO ± SRT were identified from the NCDB. Conventional radiation therapy was allowed in the IO alone cohort. The primary endpoint was OS stratified by the receipt of SRT (IO + SRT vs IO alone). Secondary endpoints included OS stratified by the presence of brain metastases (BM) and timing of SRT (before or after IO). Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology and compared via the log-rank test.ResultsOf 644 eligible patients, 63 (9.8%) received IO + SRT, and 581 (90.2%) received IO alone. Median follow-up time was 17.7 months (range, 2-24 months). Sites treated with SRT included the brain (71.4%), lung/chest (7.9%), bones (7.9%), spine (6.3%), and other (6.3%). OS was 74.4% versus 65.0% at 1 year and 71.0% versus 59.4% at 2 years for the IO + SRT and IO alone groups, respectively, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (log-rank P = .1077). In patients with BM, however, 1-year OS (73.0% vs 54.7%) and 2-year OS (70.8% vs 51.4%) was significantly higher in those receiving IO + SRT versus IO alone, respectively (pairwise P = .0261). Timing of SRT (before or after IO) did not influence OS (log-rank P = .3185).ConclusionsPatients with BM secondary to mRCC had prolonged OS with the addition of SRT to IO. Factors such as International mRCC Database Consortium risk stratification, oligometastatic tumor burden, SRT dose/fractionation, and utilization of doublet therapy should be considered in future analyses to better identify patients who may benefit from combined IO + SRT. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Project description:Abstract Background Background: It is estimated that a significant number of patients presenting with metastatic RCC are either ineligible, not recommended for, or refuse surgery. There remains no well-established method for addressing the primary tumor in such patients. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a highly effective modality for the treatment of the primary tumor in RCC. Our study seeks to evaluate SABR as an alternative approach to treat the primary tumor in patients with metastatic RCC receiving immunotherapy, who are not recommended for surgery, or who decline surgery. The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the addition of SABR to the primary tumor in combination with immunotherapy improves outcomes compared to immunotherapy alone in patients with metastatic, unresected, renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The primary endpoint is nephrectomy and radiographic progression-free survival (nrPFS) with progression determined as per iRECIST criteria. Patients are eligible if they are not recommended for upfront surgery, have a primary tumor treatable with SABR, and are candidates for immunotherapy. Immunotherapy is physician’s choice and will include either two different immunotherapy regimens (IO-IO) or immunotherapy in combination with a VEGF inhibitor (IO-VEGF). Methods 240 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio favoring SABR plus immunotherapy (n=160) as compared to standard of care immunotherapy alone (n=80). The sample size will provide 90% power at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 to detect a hazard ratio for nrPFS of 0.61, i.e., a 40% reduction in the rate of events. One-year PFS in the nivolumab plus ipilmumab arm was 50% (n=550, intermediate/poor risk population). Checkmate 9ER (Choueiri 2021) showed a one-year PFS rate in patients receiving nivolumab plus Cabozantinib (n=323) of 45-58% (intermediate/poor risk population). We have therefore estimated a one-year nrPFS rate of 50% in the control (immunotherapy alone) arm for SAMURAI. We expect nephrectomies to contribute only a small fraction to the total nrPRS events. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.62, which corresponds under exponential distribution assumptions to an absolute 15% improvement in one-year nrPFS from 50% in the control group to 65% in the experimental arm (SABR plus immunotherapy), a total sample size of 240 patients will be enrolled. This design will provide 90% power, based on a one-sided logrank test at the 0.05 alpha level, with three years of accrual and two further years of follow-up. The expected number of nrPFS events is E=175. The calculations allow for a 10% non-eligible/early dropout rate. The trial is currently open and accruing through the NRG oncology cooperative group (NCT05327686).

Project description:The purpose of the study was to identify a comprehensive prognostic system of pretreatment clinical parameters in 425 patients (pts) with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma treated with different subcutaneous (s.c.) recombinant cytokine-based home therapies in consecutive trials. Treatment consisted of (A) s.c. interferon-alpha 2a (INF-alpha), s.c. interleukin-2 (IL-2) (n=102 pts), (B) s.c. IFN-alpha 2a, s.c. IL-2, and i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (n=235 pts) or (C) s.c. IFN-alpha 2a, s.c. IL-2, and i.v. 5-FU combined with p.o. 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) (n=88 pts). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank statistics, and Cox regression analysis were employed to identify risk factors and to create a multiple risk factor model. The following pretreatment risk factors were identified by univariate analysis: (1) three and more metastatic sites, (2) presence of liver, lymph node or bone metastases, (3) neutrophil count > or = 6500 cells microl(-1), (4) serum lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH) > or = 220 U l(-1), and (5) serum C-reactive protein level (CRP) > or = 11 mg l(-1). Cox regression analysis with forward stepwise variable selection identified neutrophil count as the major prognostic factor (hazard ratio=1.9, P<0.001), while serum levels of LDH and CRP, time between diagnosis of tumour and onset of metastatic disease, number of metastatic sites, and bone metastases were significant but somewhat less important prognostic variables within the multiple risk factor model (hazard ratio < or = 1.5). Patients were assigned to one of the three risk groups according to cumulative risk defined as the sum of simplified risk s.c.ores for six pretreatment variables. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients achieved a median overall survival of 32+ months (95% CI 24, 43; 5-year survival of 27%), 18+ months (95% CI 15, 20; 5-year survival of 11%), and 8+ months (95% CI 6, 10; 5-year survival of 5%), respectively. These prognostic categories are helpful both in individual patient care and in the assessment of patients entering prospective clinical trials.

Project description:BackgroundEndogenous retrovirus (ERV) elements are genomic footprints of ancestral retroviral infections within the human genome. While the dysregulation of ERV transcription has been linked to immune cell infiltration in various cancers, its relationship with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in solid tumors, particularly metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), remains inadequately explored.MethodsThis study analyzed patients with metastatic ccRCC from two prospective clinical trials, encompassing 181 patients receiving nivolumab in the CheckMate trials (-009 to -010 and -025) and 48 patients treated with the ipilimumab-nivolumab combination in the BIONIKK trial. ERV expression was quantified using the ERVmap algorithm from RNA sequencing data. Our primary objective was to correlate ERV expression with progression-free survival, with overall survival and time-to-second-treatment survival as secondary endpoints. We used bootstrap methods with univariate Cox regression on 666 substantially expressed ERVs to evaluate their prognostic significance and stability.ResultsOur analysis centered on two ERVs, E4421_chr17 and E1659_chr4, which consistently exhibited opposing prognostic impacts across both cohorts. We developed a stratification system based on their median expression levels, categorizing patients into four ERV subgroups. These subgroups were further consolidated into a three-tier risk model that significantly correlated with ICI treatment outcomes. The most responsive ERV risk category showed enhanced endothelial cell infiltration, whereas the resistant category was characterized by higher levels of myeloid dendritic cells, regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and markers of T-cell exhaustion. Notably, this ERV-based classification outperformed traditional transcriptomic signatures in predicting ICI efficacy and showed further improvement when combined with epigenetic DNA methylation markers.ConclusionsOur findings introduce a dual ERV-based stratification system that effectively categorizes patient risk and predicts clinical outcomes for ccRCC patients undergoing ICI therapy. Beyond enhancing the predictive precision of existing transcriptomic models, this system paves the way for more targeted and individualized approaches in the realm of precision oncology.

Dataset Information

Outcomes of Radiation Therapy Plus Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System.

Purpose

Methods and materials

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Outcomes of Radiation Therapy Plus Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets