Dataset Information

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Mismatch Repair Status in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Elective Affinities.

ABSTRACT: Since endometrial cancers (ECs) are frequently TMB-H and MSI-H/dMMR tumors, this element has provided the rationale for testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have recently emerged as a potential game-changer. However, several questions remain to be addressed, including the identification of patients who may benefit from the addition of ICIs as well as those who do not need immunotherapy. In the current paper, we provide an overview of the clinical development of immunotherapy in advanced or recurrent EC, discussing the role of MMR and the "elective affinities" between ICIs and this predictive biomarker in this setting.

SUBMITTER: Rizzo A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9267485 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Mismatch Repair Status in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Elective Affinities.

Rizzo Alessandro A

Journal of clinical medicine 20220705 13

Since endometrial cancers (ECs) are frequently TMB-H and MSI-H/dMMR tumors, this element has provided the rationale for testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have recently emerged as a potential game-changer. However, several questions remain to be addressed, including the identification of patients who may benefit from the addition of ICIs as well as those who do not need immunotherapy. In the current paper, we provide an overview of the clinical development of immunotherapy in adv ...[more]

PMID: 35807197

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveMany patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) developed primary or secondary drug resistance for unknown reasons. This study investigates whether mismatch repair (MMR) genes are responsible for this therapeutic restriction.MethodsWe obtained the transcriptional, clinical and single nucleotide polymorphism data for endometrial cancer (EC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the immunophenoscore data of EC from The Cancer Immunome Atlas, then analyzed in R to evaluate the relationship between MMR genes and clinicopathological features, prognosis, immune infiltration, immune checkpoint expression and responsiveness to ICIs in EC. We used differentially expressed genes in the MSH6 high and low expression groups to conduct GO and KEGG analyses to explore the impact of MSH6 on the biological functions of EC. Finally, we verified the bioinformatics results with in vitro experiments.ResultsOur analyses showed that compared with the high MSH6 expression group, the low MSH6 expression group had better survival outcomes and less aggressive clinicopathological features. In the multivariate Cox analysis, MSH6 was the only independent risk factor that could predict the prognosis of EC. Besides, the low MSH6 expression group also had a higher immune score, more active immune infiltration and higher immune checkpoint expression, resulting in better responsiveness to ICIs treatment, consistent with the enrichment of GO terms and KEGG pathways related to immune response in this group. Meanwhile, the GO and KEGG enrichment results of the MSH6 high expression group were associated with cell cycle, DNA damage repair and tumorigenesis. To exclude the influence of MSH6 mutations, we performed the previous analyses on the MSH6 wild-type tumor samples and obtained consistent results. In vitro experiments also confirmed that after knocking down MSH6 in endometrial cancer cells, their proliferation, migration and invasion abilities were weakened, while the expression levels of PD-L1 and PD-L2 were elevated. In comparison, overexpression of MSH6 showed an opposite trend.ConclusionReduced MSH6 expression could serve as a potential biomarker for predicting better prognosis, active immune status, higher immune checkpoint expression level and better responsiveness to ICIs treatment in EC. MSH6 may become a potential target for treating solid tumors.

Project description:ImportancePrimary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors is observed in 10% to 40% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) displaying microsatellite instability (MSI) or defective mismatch repair (dMMR).ObjectiveTo investigate possible mechanisms underlying primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors of mCRC displaying MSI or dMMR.Design, setting, and participantsThis post hoc analysis of a single-center, prospective cohort included 38 patients with mCRC diagnosed as MSI or dMMR by local laboratories and entered into trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. The accuracy of MSI or dMMR status was also assessed in a retrospective cohort comprising 93 cases of mCRC that were diagnosed as MSI or dMMR between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2016, in 6 French hospitals. Primary resistance of mCRC was defined as progressive disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, 6 to 8 weeks after initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, without pseudo-progression. All tumor samples were reassessed for dMMR status using immunohistochemistry with antibodies directed against MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, and for MSI using polymerase chain reaction with pentaplex markers and with the HSP110 T17 (HT17) repeat.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was positive predictive value.ResultsAmong the 38 patients (15 women and 23 men; mean [SD] age, 55.6 [13.7] years) in the study with mCRC displaying MSI or dMMR, primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed in 5 individuals (13%). Reassessment of the status of MSI or dMMR revealed that 3 (60%) of these 5 resistant tumors were microsatellite stable or displayed proficient mismatch repair. The positive predictive value of MSI or dMMR status assessed by local laboratories was therefore 92.1% (95% CI, 78.5%-98.0%). In the retrospective cohort of 93 patients (44 women and 49 men; mean [SD] age, 56.8 [18.3] years) without immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, misdiagnosis of the MSI or dMMR status by local assessment was 10% (n = 9), with a positive predictive value of 90.3% (95% CI, 82.4%-95.0%). Testing for MSI with the HT17 assay confirmed the MSI or dMMR status in 2 of 4 cases showing discrepant results between immunohistochemistry and pentaplex polymerase chain reaction (ie, dMMR but microsatellite stable).Conclusions and relevancePrimary resistance of mCRC displaying MSI or dMMR to immune checkpoint inhibitors is due mainly to misdiagnosis of their MSI or dMMR status. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings. Microsatellite instability or dMMR status should be tested routinely using both immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction methods prior to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Dataset Information

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Mismatch Repair Status in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Elective Affinities.

Publications

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Mismatch Repair Status in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Elective Affinities.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets