Dataset Information

Guidance for characterization of in-house reference materials for light element stable isotope analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Rationale

Preparation of in-house reference materials (RMs) is an important aspect of light element stable isotope analysis. While some relevant information is available, there is as yet no clear set of guidelines available covering all aspects of in-house production and characterization of RMs.

Methods

To address this need, the experience of production of certified reference materials under accreditation to ISO 17034:2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 has been distilled into guidance for production of in-house RMs that are fit-for-purpose.

Results

The guidance provided covers five areas: (i) planning; (ii) material considerations including preparation, packaging, and storage; (iii) measurements and assessments; (iv) value and uncertainty assignment; and (v) monitoring and use.

Conclusions

In-house RMs prepared by following this guidance can be used to provide traceability to measurement results when used for normalization or for quality control and/or assurance purposes.

SUBMITTER: Dunn PJH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9286617 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Guidance for characterization of in-house reference materials for light element stable isotope analysis.

Dunn Philip J H PJH Malinovsky Dmitry D Holcombe Gill G Cowen Simon S Goenaga-Infante Heidi H

Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM 20211001 20

<h4>Rationale</h4>Preparation of in-house reference materials (RMs) is an important aspect of light element stable isotope analysis. While some relevant information is available, there is as yet no clear set of guidelines available covering all aspects of in-house production and characterization of RMs.<h4>Methods</h4>To address this need, the experience of production of certified reference materials under accreditation to ISO 17034:2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 has been distilled into guidance fo ...[more]

PMID: 34382250

Similar Datasets

Project description:We report a method for the chemical purification of Pt from geological materials by ion-exchange chromatography for subsequent Pt stable isotope analysis by multiple-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICPMS) using a 196Pt-198Pt double-spike to correct for instrumental mass bias. Double-spiking of samples was carried out prior to digestion and chemical separation to correct for any mass-dependent fractionation that may occur due to incomplete recovery of Pt. Samples were digested using a NiS fire assay method, which pre-concentrates Pt into a metallic bead that is readily dissolved in acid in preparation for anion-exchange chemistry. Pt was recovered from anion-exchange resin in concentrated HNO3 acid after elution of matrix elements, including the other platinum group elements (PGE), in dilute HCl and HNO3 acids. The separation method has been calibrated using a precious metal standard solution doped with a range of synthetic matrices and results in Pt yields of ≥90% with purity of ≥95%. Using this chemical separation technique, we have separated Pt from 11 international geological standard reference materials comprising of PGE ores, mantle rocks, igneous rocks and one sample from the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary layer. Pt concentrations in these samples range from ca. 5 ng g-1 to 4 μg g-1. This analytical method has been shown to have an external reproducibility on δ198Pt (permil difference in the 198Pt/194Pt ratio from the IRMM-010 standard) of ±0.040 (2 sd) on Pt solution standards (Creech et al., 2013, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 28, 853-865). The reproducibility in natural samples is evaluated by processing multiple replicates of four standard reference materials, and is conservatively taken to be ca. ±0.088 (2 sd). Pt stable isotope data for the full set of reference materials have a range of δ198Pt values with offsets of up to 0.4‰ from the IRMM-010 standard, which are readily resolved with this technique. These results demonstrate the potential of the Pt isotope system as a tracer in geochemical systems.

Project description:Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma multi-collector mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) allows rapid, in situ, highly precise measurements of Cu isotope ratios of native Cu and Cu-bearing minerals. However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cu-metal isotope standard NIST SRM976 that is commonly used to calibrate LA-MC-ICP-MS Cu isotope measurements of native Cu is no longer available. We have investigated the suitability of four Cu metal materials, SSC-1, SSC-3 and SSC-4 (cathode Cu metal rods) and CUPD-1 (Cu anode sawings), originally developed by the Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET) as certified reference materials for trace element analysis, as Cu isotope reference materials for LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis and solution nebulization (SN) of Cu. The Cu isotopic composition and homogeneity of these four materials were characterised by SN- and LA-MC-ICP-MS, and are reported for the first time. The bulk Cu isotopic compositions, expressed as δ65CuSRM976 in per mil (‰) relative to NIST SRM976 with combined uncertainties (U, k = 2), of SSC-1, SSC-3 and SSC-4, determined utilizing SN-MC-ICP-MS, are identical within analytical uncertainty at 0.03 ± 0.07‰ (n = 29), 0.04 ± 0.04‰ (n = 28), and 0.05 ± 0.08‰ (n = 29), respectively; the composition of CUPD-1 is 2.14 ± 0.08‰ (n = 28). The compositions are 0.01 ± 0.07‰ (n = 29), 0.04 ± 0.06‰ (n = 29), 0.03 ± 0.06‰ (n = 28) and 2.15 ± 0.06‰ (n = 28), respectively, relative to the European Reference Material ERM®-AE633 Cu isotope standard. The Cu isotope homogeneity of the four new reference materials was assessed by determining whether multiple individual in situ Cu isotope measurements made by LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis (43 µm spot size), using each of the other three reference materials as a calibrator, approximate a single normal distribution. We also investigate whether there are statistically significant differences between the mean δ65Cu values of three independent data sets for each of the Cu isotope reference materials using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Normality tests (graphical assessment of normal distribution quantile-quantile plots, and the Shapiro-Wilk, Jarque-Bera and reduced chi-squared statistic tests) show that: 1) the Cu isotope data acquired on SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 do not depart significantly from a normal distribution, 2) the scatter of the Cu isotope data is due to analytical uncertainty with 95% confidence, and 3) there are no other significant sources of scatter; e.g. heterogeneity of the reference materials. The results of one-way ANOVA reveal that the mean difference of the δ65Cu value for each of the reference materials SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 is statistically not significant at the 0.05 level. The mean δ65CuSRM976 values with combined uncertainties (U, k = 2) of SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1, determined by LA-MC-ICP-MS using each of the other three reference materials as a calibration standard, are 0.03 ± 0.09‰ (n = 132), 0.05 ± 0.09‰ (n = 154), 0.03 ± 0.09‰ (n = 144) and 2.14 ± 0.10‰ (n = 106), respectively. These values are in agreement with those determined by SN-MC-ICP-MS analysis at the 95% confidence level and have excellent precision (2 s.d. ≤ 0.10‰). These results suggest that SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 can be considered isotopically homogeneous at a spatial resolution of 43 μm, and they are suitable reference materials for calibration and quality control of in situ and solution nebulization Cu isotope analyses of Cu.

Project description:Comparability studies lie at the heart of assessments that evaluate differences amongst manufacturing processes and stability studies of protein therapeutics. Low resolution chromatographic and electrophoretic methods facilitate quantitation, but do not always yield detailed insight into the effect of the manufacturing change or environmental stress. Conversely, mass spectrometry (MS) can provide high resolution information on the molecule, but conventional methods are not very quantitative. This gap can be reconciled by use of a stable isotope-tagged reference standard (SITRS), a version of the analyte protein that is uniformly labeled (13)C6-arginine and (13)C6-lysine. The SITRS serves as an internal control that is trypsin-digested and analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)-MS with the analyte sample. The ratio of the ion intensities of each unlabeled and labeled peptide pair is then compared to that of other sample(s). A comparison of these ratios provides a readily accessible way to spot even minute differences among samples. In a study of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) spiked with varying amounts of the same antibody bearing point mutations, peptides containing the mutations were readily identified and quantified at concentrations as low as 2% relative to unmodified peptides. The method is robust, reproducible and produced a linear response for every peptide that was monitored. The method was also successfully used to distinguish between two batches of a mAb that were produced in two different cell lines while two batches produced from the same cell line were found to be highly comparable. Finally, the use of the SITRS method in the comparison of two stressed mAb samples enabled the identification of sites susceptible to deamidation and oxidation, as well as their quantitation. The experimental results indicate that use of a SITRS in a peptide mapping experiment with MS detection enables sensitive and quantitative comparability studies of proteins at high resolution.

Dataset Information

Guidance for characterization of in-house reference materials for light element stable isotope analysis.

Rationale

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Guidance for characterization of in-house reference materials for light element stable isotope analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets