Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To compare the 24-month efficacy of pessary or surgery as the primary treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP).Design
Multicentre prospective comparative cohort study.Setting
Twenty-two Dutch hospitals.Population
Women referred with symptomatic POP of stage ≥2 and moderate-to-severe POP symptoms.Methods
The primary outcome was subjective improvement at the 24-month follow-up according to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Secondary outcomes included improvement in prolapse-related symptoms measured with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), improvement in subjective severeness of symptoms according to the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) scale and crossover between therapies. The p
SUBMITTER: van der Vaart LR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9298049 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature