Dataset Information

Characterizing the relationships between patient-reported outcomes and clinician assessments of alopecia areata in a phase 2a randomized trial of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The phase 2a ALLEGRO trial (NCT02974868) investigated the safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) and brepocitinib (PF-06700841) in adults with alopecia areata. No randomized controlled trial for alopecia areata has evaluated correlations between clinician-assessed hair loss and patient-reported outcomes.

Objectives

Report scores from the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS; a patient-reported outcome tool) and explore the relationships of those scores with clinician-assessed Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores at baseline and week 24 of the ALLEGRO trial.

Methods

Adults with alopecia areata were randomized to ritlecitinib (n = 48), brepocitinib (n = 47) or placebo (n = 47). After 24 weeks, the mixed-effects model with repeated measures was used to calculate the active treatment groups' AASIS score least-squares mean differences. Relationships between AASIS and SALT scores at baseline and week 24 were evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficients using pooled data.

Results

Baseline AASIS and SALT scores were similar among treatment groups. Both active treatment groups reported significant improvements in AASIS scores at week 24 (least-squares mean differences vs. placebo for ritlecitinib, -0.8 to -2.3; brepocitinib, -0.9 to -3.7; P < 0.05 for all). At week 24, the mean SALT scores (standard deviation) improved compared with baseline [ritlecitinib, 54.4 (40.3) vs. 89.4 (15.8); brepocitinib, 31.9 (35.7) vs. 86.4 (18.1)]. The correlation coefficients between AASIS global and subscale scores and SALT scores at week 24 ranged from 0.34 to 0.58; P < 0.05 for all.

Conclusions

Patients randomized to ritlecitinib or brepocitinib reported significantly improved AASIS and SALT scores at week 24 of the ALLEGRO trial compared to placebo. At week 24, medium-to-large correlations can be seen between AASIS global and subscale scores and SALT scores. Our experience with AASIS instrument highlighted several aspects that suggest new patient-reported outcome tools are needed to accurately assess patients' relevant alopecia areata related signs, symptoms and daily functioning.

SUBMITTER: Winnette R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9303953 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Characterizing the relationships between patient-reported outcomes and clinician assessments of alopecia areata in a phase 2a randomized trial of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib.

Winnette R R Banerjee A A Sikirica V V Peeva E E Wyrwich K K

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV 20220125 4

<h4>Background</h4>The phase 2a ALLEGRO trial (NCT02974868) investigated the safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib (PF-06651600) and brepocitinib (PF-06700841) in adults with alopecia areata. No randomized controlled trial for alopecia areata has evaluated correlations between clinician-assessed hair loss and patient-reported outcomes.<h4>Objectives</h4>Report scores from the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS; a patient-reported outcome tool) and explore the relationships of those scores ...[more]

PMID: 35000236

Similar Datasets

Project description:Ritlecitinib is an oral Janus kinase 3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (JAK3/TEC) family kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA). Benefit-risk profiles of two doses of ritlecitinib (50 mg vs 30 mg once daily) were evaluated by integrating patient preferences and clinical efficacy and safety estimates for ritlecitinib. A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was utilized to elicit preferences for benefit and safety attributes of systemic AA treatments. Benefits included probabilities of ≥80% scalp hair coverage and achieving moderate to normal eyebrows and eyelashes. Potential risks included 3-year probabilities of serious infection, cancer, and blood clots. Preference estimates were used to calculate the maximum acceptable risk (MAR) that patients would accept for expected increases in benefit from choosing a higher ritlecitinib dose over a lower dose. Ritlecitinib benefits were calculated from the ALLEGRO-2b/3 clinical trial. MARs were calculated separately for each risk and jointly for all possible combinations. Adults (n = 201) with physician-confirmed ≥50% scalp hair loss from AA participated. To achieve expected increases in the probabilities of ≥80% scalp hair coverage or moderate to normal eyebrows and eyelashes when choosing 50 mg over 30 mg of ritlecitinib, patients would be willing to accept increases in each 3-year risk up to a mean of 3.88 absolute percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.86-4.90) for serious infection, 1.63 (95% CI, 1.08-2.18) for cancer, and 5.30 (95% CI, 3.60-7.00) for blood clots. These results, combined with the estimated differences in risks between the two doses, indicate that patients with AA value increases in the probabilities of scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash hair regrowth, with the average patient accepting increases in potential treatment-related risks for the 50-mg dose in exchange for higher efficacy than 30 mg. The DCE approach to measuring risk tolerance, combined with comparisons to expected benefit and risk differences, can be used to optimize AA treatment dose selection.

Project description:IntroductionPatients with alopecia areata (AA) report high levels of dissatisfaction with commonly used treatments. Patient-reported outcomes are essential to understanding patients' experiences with AA treatments. The objective of this study was to evaluate patient-reported satisfaction with hair growth among patients with AA receiving ritlecitinib or placebo and the correlation between clinician-assessed efficacy and patient-reported satisfaction.MethodsIn the ALLEGRO-2b/3 (NCT03732807) trial, patients with AA and ≥50% scalp hair loss were randomized to daily ritlecitinib or placebo for 24 weeks, with a 24-week extension of continued ritlecitinib or switch from placebo to ritlecitinib. The Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat) measure evaluated patients' satisfaction with hair growth in 3 domains: amount, quality, and overall satisfaction with hair growth. The prespecified analysis evaluated the proportion of patients who were slightly, moderately, or very satisfied with hair growth. Several post hoc analyses assessed the proportion of patients who were moderately/very satisfied and moderately/very dissatisfied and calculated polyserial correlations between change from baseline (CFB) in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) and P-Sat scores at weeks 24 and 48.ResultsAt week 24, the proportion of patients (N = 718) reporting satisfaction (slightly, moderately, or very satisfied) overall with their hair growth ranged from 36.4% in the ritlecitinib 10-mg group (evaluated for dose ranging only) to 67.5% in the 200/50-mg group versus 22.6% in the placebo groups. In patients randomized to ritlecitinib, the proportion who were satisfied increased or was maintained at week 48. A substantially greater proportion of placebo patients who switched to ritlecitinib reported satisfaction at week 48 than at week 24. Similar results were observed for patient satisfaction with the amount and quality of hair growth. In the post hoc analyses defining satisfaction as moderately/very satisfied and dissatisfaction as moderately/very dissatisfied, the benefit of ritlecitinib was also observed. All P-Sat domain scores strongly correlated with CFB-SALT scores at weeks 24 (range 0.73-0.76; p < 0.05) and 48 (0.74-0.77; p < 0.05).ConclusionsPatients receiving active ritlecitinib doses reported favorable results versus placebo in satisfaction with hair growth up to week 48. High concordance was observed between improvement in scalp hair growth evaluated by clinicians and patient-reported satisfaction.

Project description:IntroductionRitlecitinib demonstrated efficacy in patients with alopecia areata (AA) in the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study (NCT03732807). However, hair loss presentation may vary based on location (e.g., scalp, eyebrow/eyelash, body). Here, we sought to identify distinct hair loss profiles at baseline and evaluate whether they affected the efficacy of ritlecitinib.MethodsPatients with AA aged ≥ 12 years with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss were randomized to daily ritlecitinib 10 mg (assessed for dose ranging only), 30 or 50 mg (± 4-week, 200-mg loading dose), or placebo for 24 weeks. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified hair loss profiles based on four baseline measurements: clinician-reported extent of scalp (Severity of Alopecia Tool score), eyebrow hair loss, eyelash hair loss, and patient-reported body hair loss. Logistic regression evaluated ritlecitinib (50 and 30 mg) efficacy vs placebo using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) and Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat; amount, quality, and overall satisfaction) responses at Week 24, adjusting for key covariates, including latent class membership.ResultsLCA identified five latent classes: (1) primarily non-alopecia totalis (AT; complete loss of scalp hair); (2) non-AT with moderate non-scalp involvement; (3) extensive scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash involvement; (4) AT with moderate non-scalp involvement; and (5) primarily alopecia universalis (complete scalp, face, and body hair loss). Adjusting for latent class membership, patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 or 50 mg were significantly more likely to achieve PGI-C response (30 mg: odds ratio, 8.62 [95% confidence interval, 4.42-18.08]; 50 mg: 12.29 [6.29-25.85]) and P-Sat quality of hair regrowth (30 mg: 6.71 [3.53-13.51]; 50 mg: 8.17 [4.30-16.46]) vs placebo at Week 24. Results were similar for P-Sat overall satisfaction and amount of hair regrowth.ConclusionDistinct and clinically relevant hair loss profiles were identified in ALLEGRO-2b/3 participants. Ritlecitinib was efficacious compared with placebo, independent of hair loss profile at baseline.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03732807.

Dataset Information

Characterizing the relationships between patient-reported outcomes and clinician assessments of alopecia areata in a phase 2a randomized trial of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib.

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Characterizing the relationships between patient-reported outcomes and clinician assessments of alopecia areata in a phase 2a randomized trial of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets