Dataset Information

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Icotinib in Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Advanced Lung Cancer With EGFR-Sensitizing Variants Assessed by Circulating Tumor DNA Testing: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

The inability to obtain a pathological diagnosis in a certain proportion of patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer impedes precision treatment in clinical practice.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcome of first-line icotinib in patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer with unknown pathological status and positive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitizing variants assessed by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

Design, setting, and participants

The Efficiency of Icotinib in Plasma ctDNA EGFR Mutation-Positive Patients Diagnosed With Lung Cancer (CHALLENGE) trial is a prospective, multicentered, open-label, single-arm phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial conducted between July 1, 2017, and July 31, 2019. Patients with systemic treatment-naive, clinically diagnosed advanced peripheral lung cancer, unknown pathological status, and positive pretreatment plasma EGFR-sensitizing variants were eligible. A total of 391 potentially eligible Chinese patients from 19 centers in China were screened for ctDNA EGFR variants by 3 independent detection platforms (Super amplification refractory mutation system [SuperARMS] polymerase chain reaction, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing), and those with EGFR variants tested by any platform were included. Analyses were conducted from September 9 to December 31, 2021.

Interventions

Enrolled patients were treated with oral icotinib tablets (125 mg 3 times daily) until disease progression, death, or treatment discontinuation due to various reasons, such as toxic effects and withdrawing consent.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and the concordance among the 3 detection platforms.

Results

Of 116 included patients, 76 (65.5%) were female, and the median (range) age was 64 (37-85) years. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 36.3 (30.2-40.7) months. The ORR was 52.6% (95% CI, 43.1%-61.9%). The median PFS and OS were 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.3-12.2) and 23.2 months (95% CI, 17.7-28.0), respectively, and the DCR was 84.5% (95% CI, 76.6%-90.5%). The concordance rate among the 3 detection platforms was 80.1% (313 of 391), and the clinical outcomes in patients identified as positive by any platform were comparable.

Conclusions and relevance

This prospective phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial suggests that for patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer with unknown pathological status, ctDNA-based EGFR genotyping could help decision-making in particular clinical situations, while still warranting future larger-scaled real-world exploration.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03346811.

SUBMITTER: Xu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9305594 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Icotinib in Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Advanced Lung Cancer With EGFR-Sensitizing Variants Assessed by Circulating Tumor DNA Testing: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Xu Jiachen J Liu Zheng Z Bai Hua H Dong Guilan G Zhong Jia J Wan Rui R Zang Aiming A Li Xiaoling X Li Qingshan Q Guo Jun J Du Nan N Zhong Diansheng D Huang Yan Y Lv Qun Q Zhang Jinghua J Zhao Yue Y Gao Liming L Li Lin L Zhang Chunyi C Zhao Jun J Li Baolan B Liu Zhe Z Yang Zhenlin Z Ji Dong D Wang Tao T Duan Jianchun J Wang Zhijie Z Wang Jie J

JAMA oncology 20220901 9

<h4>Importance</h4>The inability to obtain a pathological diagnosis in a certain proportion of patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer impedes precision treatment in clinical practice.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the clinical outcome of first-line icotinib in patients with clinically diagnosed advanced lung cancer with unknown pathological status and positive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitizing variants assessed by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).<h4>Design, settin ...[more]

PMID: 35862035

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceLiquid biopsy has emerged as a complement to tumor tissue profiling for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The optimal way to integrate liquid biopsy into the diagnostic algorithm for patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC remains unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping before tissue diagnosis among patients with suspected advanced NSCLC and its association with time to treatment.Design, setting, and participantsThis single-group nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted among 150 patients at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) between July 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022. Patients referred for investigation and diagnosis of lung cancer were eligible if they had radiologic evidence of advanced lung cancer prior to a tissue diagnosis.InterventionsPatients underwent plasma ctDNA testing with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay before lung cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic biopsy and tissue NGS were performed per standard of care.Main outcome and measuresThe primary end point was time from referral to treatment initiation among patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC using ctDNA testing before diagnosis (ACCELERATE [Accelerating Lung Cancer Diagnosis Through Liquid Biopsy] cohort). This cohort was compared with a reference cohort using standard tissue genotyping after tissue diagnosis.ResultsOf the 150 patients (median age at diagnosis, 68 years [range, 33-91 years]; 80 men [53%]) enrolled, 90 (60%) had advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. The median time to treatment was 39 days (IQR, 27-52 days) for the ACCELERATE cohort vs 62 days (IQR, 44-82 days) for the reference cohort (P < .001). Among the ACCELERATE cohort, the median turnaround time from sample collection to genotyping results was 7 days (IQR, 6-9 days) for plasma and 23 days (IQR, 18-28 days) for tissue NGS (P < .001). Of the 90 patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, 21 (23%) started targeted therapy before tissue NGS results were available, and 11 (12%) had actionable alterations identified only through plasma testing.Conclusions and relevanceThis nonrandomized clinical trial found that the use of plasma ctDNA genotyping before tissue diagnosis among patients with suspected advanced NSCLC was associated with accelerated time to treatment compared with a reference cohort undergoing standard tissue testing.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04863924.

Project description:BackgroundSleep disturbances are widespread among nursing home (NH) patients and associated with numerous negative consequences. Identifying and treating them should therefore be of high clinical priority. No prior studies have investigated the degree to which sleep disturbances as detected by actigraphy and by the sleep-related items in the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) provide comparable results. Such knowledge is highly needed, since both questionnaires are used in clinical settings and studies use the NPI-NH sleep item to measure sleep disturbances. For this reason, insight into their relative (dis)advantages is valuable.MethodCross-sectional study of 83 NH patients. Sleep was objectively measured with actigraphy for 7 days, and rated by NH staff with the sleep items in the CSDD and the NPI-NH, and results were compared. McNemar's tests were conducted to investigate whether there were significant differences between the pairs of relevant measures. Cohen's Kappa tests were used to investigate the degree of agreement between the pairs of relevant actigraphy, NPI-NH and CSDD measures. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were conducted for each of the pairs, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were designed as a plot of the true positive rate against the false positive rate for the diagnostic test.ResultsProxy-raters reported sleep disturbances in 20.5% of patients assessed with NPI-NH and 18.1% (difficulty falling asleep), 43.4% (multiple awakenings) and 3.6% (early morning awakenings) of patients had sleep disturbances assessed with CSDD. Our results showed significant differences (p<0.001) between actigraphy measures and proxy-rated sleep by the NPI-NH and CSDD. Sensitivity and specificity analyses supported these results.ConclusionsCompared to actigraphy, proxy-raters clearly underreported NH patients' sleep disturbances as assessed by sleep items in NPI-NH and CSDD. The results suggest that the usefulness of proxy-rater measures of sleep may be questionable and further research is needed into their clinical value. The results highlight the need for NH staff to acquire and act on knowledge about sleep and sleep challenges among NH patients.Trial registrationRegistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT02238652 ) on July 7th 2014 (6 months after study initiation).

Project description:BackgroundComprehensive biomarker testing is essential in selecting optimal treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, incomplete genotyping is widespread, with most patients not receiving testing for all guideline-recommended biomarkers, in part due to reliance on burdensome sequential tissue-based single-biomarker tests with long waiting times or availability of only archival tissue samples. We aimed to demonstrate that liquid biopsy, associated with rapid turnaround time (TAT) and lower patient burden, effectively identifies guideline-recommended biomarkers in mCRC relative to standard of care (SOC) tissue testing.Patients and methodsProspectively enrolled patients with previously untreated mCRC undergoing physician discretion SOC tissue genotyping submitted pretreatment blood samples for comprehensive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis with Guardant360 and targeted RAS and BRAF analysis with OncoBEAM.ResultsAmong 155 patients, physician discretion SOC tissue genotyping identified a guideline-recommended biomarker in 82 patients, versus 88 identified with comprehensive ctDNA (52.9% versus 56.8%, noninferiority demonstrated down to α = 0.005) and 69 identified with targeted PCR ctDNA analysis (52.9% versus 44.5%, noninferiority rejected at α = 0.05). Utilizing ctDNA in addition to tissue increased patient identification for a guideline-recommended biomarker by 19.5% by rescuing those without tissue results either due to tissue insufficiency, test failure, or false negatives. ctDNA median TAT was significantly faster than tissue testing when the complete process from sample acquisition to results was considered (median 10 versus 27 days, P < 0.0001), resulting in accelerated biomarker discovery, with 52.0% biomarker-positive patients identified by ctDNA versus 10.2% by SOC tissue 10 days after sample collection (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsComprehensive ctDNA genotyping accurately identifies guideline-recommended biomarkers in patients with mCRC at a rate at least as high as SOC tissue genotyping, in a much shorter time. Based on these findings, the addition of ctDNA genotyping to clinical practice has significant potential to improve the care of patients with mCRC.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral randomized controlled trials have suggested that adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were associated with prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after radical resection, comparing with chemotherapy or placebo. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of different first-generation EGFR-TKIs as adjuvant treatment in real-world setting.MethodsEarly-stage EGFR mutated NSCLC patients who underwent radical resection and treated with first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, icotinib) as adjuvant therapy between Feb 2010 and Jan 2019 were retrieved from a prospectively-maintained database in our center. The primary endpoint was DFS in stage II/III (TNM 8th) patients with exploratory endpoint regarding DFS in stage I patients. Sensitivity analyses were based on propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts. Treatment failure patterns among different TKIs were also compared.ResultsOf 588 eligible patients, 198 patients (33.7%) received gefitinib, 106 patients (17.9%) received erlotinib, and 284 patients (48.2%) received icotinib. The median DFS of stage II/III patients in the gefitinib, erlotinib and icotinib group were 36.1 months (95% CI, 23.9-49.4), 42.8 months (95% CI, 29.6-97.8), and 32.5 months (95% CI, 23.9-49.4), respectively, with no significant difference (log-rank test P=0.22). There was also no significant difference in DFS among stage I patients receiving different TKIs (P=0.12). PSM adjustments and multivariate analyses adjusting for other confounders revealed similar results. In addition, there were no significant differences in treatment failure pattens in different EGFR-TKI arms, especially in terms of brain metastases (6.1% in gefitinb, 7.5% in erlotinib, 3.9% in icotinib) and bone metastases (8.6% in gefitinb, 9.4% in erlotinib, 7.0% in icotinib).ConclusionsThis first and largest real-world study showed that gefitinib, erlotinib, and icotinib demonstrated comparable clinical effectiveness as adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage EGFR mutated NSCLC.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Icotinib in Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Advanced Lung Cancer With EGFR-Sensitizing Variants Assessed by Circulating Tumor DNA Testing: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Interventions

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Trial registration

Publications

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Icotinib in Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Advanced Lung Cancer With EGFR-Sensitizing Variants Assessed by Circulating Tumor DNA Testing: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets