Resistance mutations in SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant after tixagevimab-cilgavimab treatment.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Vellas C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9307285 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Resistance mutations in SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant after tixagevimab-cilgavimab treatment.
Vellas Camille C Kamar Nassim N Izopet Jacques J
The Journal of infection 20220722 5
Similar Datasets
Project description:Therapeutic anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) provide immunosuppressed and vulnerable populations with prophylactic and treatment interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) is a combination of extended-half-life neutralizing MAbs that bind to distinct epitopes on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The Omicron variant of concern carries mutations at >35 positions in the spike protein and has undergone further genetic diversification since its emergence in November 2021. Here, we characterize the in vitro neutralization activity of AZD7442 toward major viral subvariants circulating worldwide during the first 9 months of the Omicron wave. BA.2 and its derived subvariants showed the highest susceptibility to AZD7442, while BA.1 and BA.1.1 showed a lower susceptibility. BA.4/BA.5 had a susceptibility level intermediate between BA.1 and BA.2. Mutagenesis of parental Omicron subvariant spike proteins was performed to establish a molecular model to describe the underlying determinants of neutralization by AZD7442 and its component MAbs. The concurrent mutation of residues at positions 446 and 493, located in the tixagevimab and cilgavimab binding sites, was sufficient to enhance in vitro susceptibility of BA.1 to AZD7442 and its component MAbs to levels similar to the Wuhan-Hu-1+D614G virus. AZD7442 maintained neutralization activity against all Omicron subvariants tested up to and including BA.5. The evolving nature of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic warrants continuing real-time molecular surveillance and assessment of in vitro activity of MAbs used in prophylaxis against and the treatment of COVID-19. IMPORTANCE MAbs are key therapeutic options for COVID-19 prophylaxis and treatment in immunosuppressed and vulnerable populations. Due to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Omicron, it is vital to ensure that neutralization is maintained for MAb-based interventions. We studied the in vitro neutralization of AZD7442 (tixagevimab-cilgavimab), a cocktail of two long-acting MAbs targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, toward Omicron subvariants circulating from November 2021 to July 2022. AZD7442 neutralized major Omicron subvariants up to and including BA.5. The mechanism of action responsible for the lower in vitro susceptibility of BA.1 to AZD7442 was investigated using in vitro mutagenesis and molecular modeling. A combination of mutations at two spike protein positions, namely, 446 and 493, was sufficient to enhance BA.1 susceptibility to AZD7442 to levels similar to the Wuhan-Hu-1+D614G ancestral virus. The evolving nature of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic warrants continuing real-time global molecular surveillance and mechanistic studies of therapeutic MAbs for COVID-19.
| S-EPMC10100701 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9108069 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab-cilgavimab significantly reduced severe COVID-19 outcomes in high-risk individuals during the pre-Omicron era (PROVENT trial). However, efficacy in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) was underreported. The rapid emergence of Omicron strains in 2021 showed reduced neutralizing activity in preclinical data, but real-world data remains limited due to short follow-up.Patients and methodsWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab in 86 HM patients during the early Omicron wave, including the BA.2, BA.5, and XBB.1 sublineages. These patients received PrEP between February and August 2022 due to impaired vaccine response (72%) and B-cell depletion (46.5%). They were followed prospectively until April 2023, with a median follow-up of 297 days.ResultsBreakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 32.6% of patients, with 22.1% within six months. Infections within six months were milder and shorter. B-cell depletion within six (p = 0.035) and twelve months (p = 0.016) was identified as risk factor for breakthrough infections. No new safety events were reported.ConclusionOur data showed that tixagevimab-cilgavimab prophylaxis effectively reduces severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with HM, particularly within the first six months, even during the Omicron era. However, those with recent B-cell depletion (within 12 months) remained at high risk.
| S-EPMC11880995 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9790897 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Several virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become new tools in the treatment of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), but their effectiveness against the rapidly mutating virus is questionable. The present study investigated the effectiveness of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab and Regdanvimab for mild and moderate COVID-19 treatment in real-world clinical practice during the Omicron variant-dominant period. Patients with known risk factors for disease progression and increasing disease severity were enrolled in the study within the first 7 days of symptom onset. Seventy-seven patients were divided into four groups: first 15 patients received 300 mg Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab intravenously (IV) and 23 patients got the same drug 300 mg intramuscularly (IM), the next 15 patients was on the same combination in dose of 600 mg IV, and 24 patients were on Regdanvimab at a dose of 40 mg/kg IV. By Day 4, 100% of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab IV patients showed negative polymerase chain reaction results for SARS-CoV-2 Ribonucleic acid (RNA) regardless of the mAbs dose while in the Regdanvimab group 29% of the patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA. The testing for virus neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) to various Omicron sublineages (BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5) showed that an increase in nAb levels was detected in blood serum immediately after the drug administration only in Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab 300 mg and 600 mg IV groups. In the group of intravenous Regdanvimab, a significant increase in the level of nAbs to the Wuhan variant was detected immediately after the drug administration, while no increase in nAbs to different Omicron sublineages was observed.Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05982704.
| S-EPMC10623550 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9112603 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on results of a clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The clinical effectiveness of T/C has not been well described in the Omicron era. We examined the incidence of symptomatic illness and hospitalizations among T/C recipients when Omicron accounted for virtually all local cases. Methods Through retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we identified patients who received T/C between January 1 –July 31, 2022 within our quaternary referral health system. We determined the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations due to or presumed to be caused by early Omicron variants before and after receiving T/C (pre-T/C and post-T/C). Chi square and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon two-sample tests were used to examine differences between the characteristics of those who got COVID-19 before or after T/C prophylaxis, and rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess differences in hospitalization rates for the two groups. Results Of 1295 T/C recipients, 105 (8.1%) developed symptomatic COVID-19 infection before receiving T/C, and 102 (7.9%) developed symptomatic disease after receiving it. Of the 105 patients who developed symptomatic infection pre-T/C, 26 (24.8%) were hospitalized, compared with six of the 102 patients (5.9%) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 post-T/C (RR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.10–0.55; p = 0.0002). Seven of the 105 (6.7%) patients infected pre-T/C, but none of the 102 infected post-T/C required ICU care. No COVID-related deaths occurred in either group. The majority of COVID-19 cases among those infected pre-T/C treatment occurred during the Omicron BA.1 surge, while the majority of post-T/C cases occurred when Omicron BA.5 was predominant. In both groups, having at least one dose of vaccine strongly protected against hospitalization (pre-T/C group RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.17–0.57, p = 0.02; post-T/C group RR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.03–0.94; p = 0.04). Conclusion We identified COVID-19 infections after T/C prophylaxis. Among patients who received T/C at our institution, COVID-19 Omicron cases occurring after T/C were one-fourth as likely to require hospitalization compared to those with Omicron prior to T/C. However, due to the presence of changing vaccine coverage, multiple therapies, and changing variants, the effectiveness of T/C in the Omicron era remains difficult to assess.
| S-EPMC10138227 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The approved combination of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab has been shown to decrease the rate of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients at increased risk of inadequate response to vaccination. However, Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab was tested in a few studies that included patients with hematological malignancies, even if this population has shown an increased risk of unfavorable outcomes following infection (with high rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mortality) and poor significant immunization following vaccines. We performed a real-life prospective cohort study to evaluate the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection following pre-exposure prophylaxis with Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab in anti-spike seronegative patients compared to a cohort of seropositive patients who were observed or received a fourth vaccine dose. We recruited 103 patients with a mean age of 67 years: 35 (34%) received Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab and were followed from March 17, 2022, until November 15, 2022. After a median follow-up of 4.24 months, the 3-month cumulative incidence of infection was 20% versus 12% in the Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab and observation/vaccine groups respectively (HR 1.57; 95% CI: 0.65-3.56; p = 0.34). In this study, we report our experience with Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab and a tailored approach to SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention in patients with hematological malignancies during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron surge.
| S-EPMC10324575 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tixagevimab 150 mg and cilgavimab 150 mg (EVUSHELDTM 150 mg + 150 mg solution for injection; tixagevimab + cilgavimab) is an intramuscular (IM) long-acting monoclonal antibody combination developed by AstraZeneca for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. In March 2022, tixagevimab + cilgavimab was approved in the UK for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in adults who are not currently infected with SARS-CoV-2 and who have not had a known recent exposure to an individual infected with SARS-CoV-2 and who are unlikely to mount an adequate immune response to COVID-19 vaccination or for whom COVID-19 vaccination is not recommended, and in the EU for the prevention of COVID-19 in adults and adolescents aged ≥ 12 years and weighing ≥40 kg. In December 2021, tixagevimab + cilgavimab was granted Emergency Use Authorization by the US FDA for the pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in adults and paediatric individuals (≥ 12 years of age and weighing ≥ 40 kg). This article summarizes the milestones in the development of tixagevimab + cilgavimab leading to this first approval for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in individuals who are not currently infected with SARS-CoV-2.
| S-EPMC9211051 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9501743 | biostudies-literature