Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Aims
To compare endoscopy gastric cancer images diagnosis rate between artificial intelligence (AI) and expert endoscopists.Patients and methods
We used the retrospective data of 500 patients, including 100 with gastric cancer, matched 1:1 to diagnosis by AI or expert endoscopists. We retrospectively evaluated the noninferiority (prespecified margin 5 %) of the per-patient rate of gastric cancer diagnosis by AI and compared the per-image rate of gastric cancer diagnosis.Results
Gastric cancer was diagnosed in 49 of 49 patients (100 %) in the AI group and 48 of 51 patients (94.12 %) in the expert endoscopist group (difference 5.88, 95 % confidence interval: -0.58 to 12.3). The per-image rate of gastric cancer diagnosis was higher in the AI group (99.87 %, 747 /748 im
SUBMITTER: Niikura R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9329064 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature