Dataset Information

COVID-19 Effects on Public Finance and SDG Priorities in Developing Countries: Comparative Evidence from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented global health crisis, rapidly transferred into a global economic and social crisis. The pandemic has threatened the world's commitment to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 as governments in developing countries have shifted their priorities from attaining SDGs, to providing urgent financial needs to save lives and prevent recession in hopes for a rapid economic recovery. The rerouting of public funding priorities has undermined the progress and achievement of SDGs. We employed a mixed-method and carried out a comparative study using pre- and post-public financial data of two developing countries in South Asia; Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. A threefold analysis was conducted to investigate the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic in two countries, the impact of the pandemic on external and internal public finance and the effect of the pandemic in shifting the policy priorities from SDGs to economic survival. This study found that both countries are highly vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic and are suffering from the lack of financing from external sources through the private sector as well as an increasing foreign debt. There is mounting pressure on the fiscal balance in both countries.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41287-022-00558-6.

SUBMITTER: Colombage SRN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9330931 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

COVID-19 Effects on Public Finance and SDG Priorities in Developing Countries: Comparative Evidence from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

Colombage Sisira R N SRN Barua Suborna S Nanayakkara Madurika M Colombage Udari N UN

The European journal of development research 20220727 1

The COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented global health crisis, rapidly transferred into a global economic and social crisis. The pandemic has threatened the world's commitment to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 as governments in developing countries have shifted their priorities from attaining SDGs, to providing urgent financial needs to save lives and prevent recession in hopes for a rapid economic recovery. The rerouting of public funding priorities has undermined the progr ...[more]

PMID: 35915624

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Young-onset diabetes (YOD) is characterised by unique diagnostic and management challenges more pronounced in resource-limited settings like Sri Lanka. Aims: We aimed to ascertain the prevalence, patterns and characteristics of YOD in Sri Lanka and describe the state of care. Methods: Retrospective review of baseline data of all patients enrolled in the prospective multicentre Database for Young-Onset Diabetes, Sri Lanka (DYOD-SL), was performed, from April 2021 to April 2023. Results: A total of 2531 patient data were included from 28 centres island-wide. Females were 57.6%. The median age was 20 years (interquartile range (IQR) 17, 23), and the age at diagnosis was 15 years (IQR 12, 18). Type 1 diabetes (T1D) was the commonest (57.6%), followed by Type 2 diabetes (T2D) at 34.3%. Younger age at disease onset (p < 0.001), lower BMI (p < 0.001), and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at presentation (p < 0.001) favoured T1D. In the total cohort, the median HbA1c was 9.8% (IQR 7.8, 12.1) with younger patients having poorer control (p = 0.001). Prevalence of nephropathy was 8.1%, retinopathy was 6.6%, neuropathy was 4.1%, moderate-high-risk diabetic foot disease was 1.9%, and macrovascular complications were 0.5%. Hypertension and dyslipidaemia occurred in 2.7% and 14%, respectively. Among patients > 18 years, overweight and obese were 22.2% and 10.4%. Corresponding prevalence in the 5-18-year age group was 20% and 14.7%. Among the insulin users (76%) in the total cohort, the majority (64.7%) were on premixed-based insulin regimens delivered by syringes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (BG) was reported in 71.3% of the total population. None were on continuous/flash glucose monitoring or insulin pumps. Conclusion: T1D was the commonest subtype of YOD in this hospital-based population. However, T2D was notably higher and is of significant concern. Overall, suboptimal glycaemic control and high rate of complications were noted along with substandard insulin regimens and BG monitoring.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough therapeutic hypothermia reduces death or disability after neonatal encephalopathy in high-income countries, its safety and efficacy in low-income and middle-income countries is unclear. We aimed to examine whether therapeutic hypothermia alongside optimal supportive intensive care reduces death or moderate or severe disability after neonatal encephalopathy in south Asia.MethodsWe did a multicountry open-label, randomised controlled trial in seven tertiary neonatal intensive care units in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. We enrolled infants born at or after 36 weeks of gestation with moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy and a need for continued resuscitation at 5 min of age or an Apgar score of less than 6 at 5 min of age (for babies born in a hospital), or both, or an absence of crying by 5 min of age (for babies born at home). Using a web-based randomisation system, we allocated infants into a group receiving whole body hypothermia (33·5°C) for 72 h using a servo-controlled cooling device, or to usual care (control group), within 6 h of birth. All recruiting sites had facilities for invasive ventilation, cardiovascular support, and access to 3 Tesla MRI scanners and spectroscopy. Masking of the intervention was not possible, but those involved in the magnetic resonance biomarker analysis and neurodevelopmental outcome assessments were masked to the allocation. The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of death or moderate or severe disability at 18-22 months, assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (third edition) and a detailed neurological examination. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02387385.FindingsWe screened 2296 infants between Aug 15, 2015, and Feb 15, 2019, of whom 576 infants were eligible for inclusion. After exclusions, we recruited 408 eligible infants and we assigned 202 to the hypothermia group and 206 to the control group. Primary outcome data were available for 195 (97%) of the 202 infants in the hypothermia group and 199 (97%) of the 206 control group infants. 98 (50%) infants in the hypothermia group and 94 (47%) infants in the control group died or had a moderate or severe disability (risk ratio 1·06; 95% CI 0·87-1·30; p=0·55). 84 infants (42%) in the hypothermia group and 63 (31%; p=0·022) infants in the control group died, of whom 72 (36%) and 49 (24%; p=0·0087) died during neonatal hospitalisation. Five serious adverse events were reported: three in the hypothermia group (one hospital readmission relating to pneumonia, one septic arthritis, and one suspected venous thrombosis), and two in the control group (one related to desaturations during MRI and other because of endotracheal tube displacement during transport for MRI). No adverse events were considered causally related to the study intervention.InterpretationTherapeutic hypothermia did not reduce the combined outcome of death or disability at 18 months after neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries, but significantly increased death alone. Therapeutic hypothermia should not be offered as treatment for neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries, even when tertiary neonatal intensive care facilities are available.FundingNational Institute for Health Research, Garfield Weston Foundation, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.TranslationsFor the Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada, Singhalese, Tamil, Marathi and Bangla translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Dataset Information

COVID-19 Effects on Public Finance and SDG Priorities in Developing Countries: Comparative Evidence from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

Supplementary information

Publications

COVID-19 Effects on Public Finance and SDG Priorities in Developing Countries: Comparative Evidence from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets