Peer evaluation and feedback for invasive medical procedures: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is significant variability in the performance and outcomes of invasive medical procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention, endoscopy, and bronchoscopy. Peer evaluation is a common mechanism for assessment of clinician performance and care quality, and may be ideally suited for the evaluation of medical procedures. We therefore sought to perform a systematic review to identify and characterize peer evaluation tools for practicing clinicians, assess evidence supporting the validity of peer evaluation, and describe best practices of peer evaluation programs across multiple invasive medical procedures.

Methods

A systematic search of Medline and Embase (through September 7, 2021) was conducted to identify studies of peer evaluation and feedback relatin

SUBMITTER: Thai T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9335975 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature