Dataset Information

What is a Good Death? A Choice Experiment on Care Indicators for Patients at End of Life.

ABSTRACT:

Context

Health systems should aim to deliver on what matters most to patients. With respect to end of life (EOL) care, knowledge on patient preferences for care is currently lacking.

Objectives

To quantify preference weights for key EOL care indicators.

Methods

We developed a discrete choice experiment survey with 13 key indicators related to patients' experience in the last six weeks of life. We fielded the survey to a web-panel of caregiver proxies for recently deceased care recipients. We obtained 250 responses in each of five countries: India, Singapore, Kenya, the UK and the US. Latent-class analysis was used to evaluate preference weights for each indicator within and across countries.

Results

A 2-class latent-class model was the best fit. Class 1 (average class probability = 64.7%) preference weights were logically ordered and highly significant, while Class 2 estimates were generally disordered, suggesting poor data quality. Class 1 results indicated health care providers' ability to control patients' pain to desired levels was most important (11.5%, 95% CI: 10.3%-12.6%), followed by clean, safe, and comfortable facilities (10.0%, 95% CI: 9.0%-11.0%); and kind and sympathetic health care providers (9.8%, 95% CI: 8.8%-10.9%). Providers' support for nonmedical concerns had the lowest preference weight (4.4%, 95% CI: 3.6%-5.3%). Differences in preference weights across countries were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Results reveal that not all aspects of EOL care are equally valued. Not accounting for these differences would lead to inappropriate conclusions on how best to improve EOL care.

SUBMITTER: Sepulveda JMG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9341237 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

What is a Good Death? A Choice Experiment on Care Indicators for Patients at End of Life.

Sepulveda Juan Marcos Gonzalez JMG Baid Drishti D Johnson F Reed FR Finkelstein Eric A EA

Journal of pain and symptom management 20211115 4

<h4>Context</h4>Health systems should aim to deliver on what matters most to patients. With respect to end of life (EOL) care, knowledge on patient preferences for care is currently lacking.<h4>Objectives</h4>To quantify preference weights for key EOL care indicators.<h4>Methods</h4>We developed a discrete choice experiment survey with 13 key indicators related to patients' experience in the last six weeks of life. We fielded the survey to a web-panel of caregiver proxies for recently deceased c ...[more]

PMID: 34793947

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDespite research supporting the benefits of early palliative care, timely initiation by gynecologic oncology patients is reportedly low, which may limit the effectiveness of palliative care.ObjectiveTo investigate the association of the timing of palliative care initiation with the aggressiveness of end-of-life care using established quality indicators among patients with ovarian cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis population-based retrospective cohort study of ovarian cancer decedents used linked administrative health care data to identify palliative care provision across all health care sectors and health care professionals (specialist and nonspecialist) and end-of-life quality indicators in Ontario, Canada, from 2006 to 2018. Data analyses were performed July 12, 2024.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the associations between the timing of palliative care and end-of-life quality indicators, including emergency department use, hospital or intensive care unit admission in the last 30 days of life, chemotherapy in last 14 days of life, death in the hospital, and a composite measure of aggressive care. Late palliative care was defined as 3 months or less prior to death.ResultsThere were 8297 ovarian cancer decedents. Their mean (SD) age at death was 69.6 (13.1) years, and their mean (SD) oncologic survival was 2.8 (3.9) years. Among 3958 patients with known cancer stage, 3495 (88.3%) presented with stage III or IV disease. One-third of patients (2667 [32.1%]) received late palliative care in the final 3 months of life. Results of multivariable regression analysis indicated that any palliative care initiated earlier than 3 months before death was associated with lower rates of aggressive end-of-life care (odds ratio [OR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.37-0.60]), death in hospital (OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.45-0.65]), and intensive care unit admission (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.27-0.76]). Specialist palliative consultation from 3 months up to 6 monts before death was associated with decreased likelihood of late chemotherapy (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.88]).ConclusionsFindings from this cohort study suggested that early palliative care may be associated with less-aggressive end-of-life care than late palliative care. Implementation strategies for early palliative care initiation are needed to optimize care quality and health resource utilization at the end of life.

Project description:BackgroundGiven significant morbidity and mortality associated with oesophageal cancer, supportive, high-quality end-of-life care is critical. Most patients with advanced cancer prefer to die at home, but incongruence between preferred and actual place of death is common. Here, we examined trends and disparities in location of death among patients with oesophageal cancer.MethodsUsing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Range Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database, we utilized multinomial logistic regression to assess associations between sociodemographic characteristics and location of death for patients with oesophageal cancer (n = 237,063). Additionally, we utilized linear regression models to evaluate the significance of changes in location of death trends over time and disparities in the relative change in location of death trends across sociodemographic groups.FindingsFrom 2003 to 2019, there was a decrease of deaths in hospitals, nursing homes, and outpatient medical facilities/emergency departments and an increase of deaths at home and in hospice. Relative to White decedents, Black and Asian decedents were less likely to die at home (relative risk ratio (RRR): 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.60], RRR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.53-0.61]) and in hospice (RRR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.64-0.71], RRR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.43-0.55]) when compared to the hospital. Similar disparities were noted for American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) decedents. These disparities persisted even upon stratifying by the number of listed causes of death, a proxy for severity of illness. Time trend analysis indicated that increases in deaths in hospice over time occurred at a slower rate for AIAN and Asian decedents relative to White decedents.Interpretation2 in 5 patients with oesophageal cancer die at home, with an increasing proportion dying at home and in hospice-in line with general patient preferences. However, location of death disparities have largely persisted over time among racial and ethnic minority groups. Our findings suggest the importance of improving access to advance care planning and delivering tailored, person-centred interventions.FundingNone.

Project description:BackgroundDeath resulting from COVID-19 in a hospital during the pandemic has meant death in isolation. Although many health-care providers (HCPs) have struggled with end-of-life (EOL) care for these patients, the various strategies across hospitals are not well known.Research questionWhat EOL care did HCPs give patients dying of COVID-19 and their families in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic? What were the key themes in care?Study design and methodsThis qualitative study used individual, semistructured, internet, and face-to-face interviews. We recruited HCPs who provided EOL care to patients with COVID-19 dying in hospitals and their families. Purposive sampling was used through the academic networks at the School of Public Health, Kyoto University. Anonymized verbatim transcripts were analyzed thematically.ResultsFifteen doctors and 18 nurses from 23 hospitals in 13 regions across Japan participated; 16 participants (48%) were women, with an age range of 20 to 59 years (most were 30-39 years of age ). Participants described 51 strategies, including providing physical and psychological-spiritual care, making connections, providing death care, and arranging care environments and bereavement care for patients and their families. Four themes emerged as prominent efforts in COVID-19 EOL care: maintaining relationships with isolated patients, connecting patients and families, sharing decision-making in isolation, and creating humanistic episodes.InterpretationProper application and awareness of the four themes may help HCPs to implement better EOL care. To compensate for limited memories resulting from isolation and rapid progression of the disease, communicating and creating humanistic episodes are emphasized. ICU diaries and the HCPs' arrangements based on cultural funerary procedures could be provided as grief care for the family and to build trust. EOL education and building partnerships among palliative care staff and nonmedical personnel on a regular basis may enhance the capacity to deliver the necessary support for EOL care.

Project description:BackgroundQuality of care at the end of life in hospitals is often perceived to be lower compared to the care that is provided to people who die in their own home. Documenting and measuring indicators of common end-of-life symptoms could help improve end-of-life care in hospitals. This study provided insight into quality indicators for the end-of-life care of patients who died in a Dutch hospital, and assessed differences between deceased patients who were admitted for palliative/terminal care versus patients admitted for other reasons.MethodsIn a retrospective record review study, trained nurses reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) of patients who died in 2019 (n = 2998), in a stratified sample of 20 Dutch hospitals. The nurses registered whether data was found in de EHRs about quality indicators for end-of-life care. This concerned: symptoms (pain, shortness of breath, anxiety, depressive symptoms), spiritual and psychological support and advance care planning. Multilevel regression analyses were performed to assess differences between patients who had been admitted for palliative/terminal care and patients admitted for other reasons.ResultsCommon end-of-life symptoms were rarely measured using a standardized method (e.g. Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale or Utrecht Symptom Diary). The symptom burden of pain was measured using a standardized method more often (63.3%) than the symptom burden of shortness of breath (2.2%), anxiety (0.5%) and depressive symptoms (0.3%). Similarly, little information was documented in the EHRs regarding wish to involve a spiritual counsellor, psychologist or social worker. Life expectancy was documented in 66%. The preferred place of death was documented less often (20%). The documentation of some quality indicators differed between patients who were admitted for palliative/terminal care compared to other patients.ConclusionExcept for the burden of pain, symptoms are rarely measured with standardized methods in patients who died in Dutch Hospitals. This study underlines the importance of documenting information about symptom burden and aspects related to advance care planning, and spiritual and psychological support to improve the quality of end-of-life care for patients in hospitals. Furthermore, uniformity in measuring methods improves the possibility to compare results between patient groups and settings.

Project description:BackgroundDelegation of clinical tasks from physiotherapists to physiotherapy support workers is common yet varies considerably in musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services, leading to variation in patient care. This study aimed to explore patients' preferences and estimate specific trade-offs patients are willing to make in treatment choices when treated in musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services.MethodsA discrete choice experiment was conducted using an efficient design with 16 choice scenarios, divided into two blocks. Adult patients with musculoskeletal conditions recruited from a physiotherapy service completed a cross-sectional, online questionnaire. Choice data analyses were conducted using a multinomial logit model. The marginal rate of substitution for waiting time to first follow-up physiotherapy appointment and distance from the physiotherapy clinic was calculated and a probability model was built to estimate the probability of choosing between two distinct physiotherapy service options under different scenarios.Results382 patient questionnaires were completed; 302 participants were treated by physiotherapists and 80 by physiotherapists and support workers. There was a significant preference to be seen by a physiotherapist, have more follow-up treatments, to wait less time for the first follow-up appointment, to be seen one-to-one, to see the same clinician, to travel a shorter distance to get to the clinic and to go to clinics with ample parking. Participants treated by support workers did not have a significant preference to be seen by a physiotherapist and it was more likely that they would choose to be seen by a support worker for clinic scenarios where the characteristics of the physiotherapy service were as good or better.ConclusionsFindings highlight that patients treated by support workers are likely to choose to be treated by support workers again if the other service characteristics are as good or better compared to a service where treatment is provided only by physiotherapists. Findings have implications for the design of physiotherapy services to enhance patient experience when patients are treated by support workers. The findings will contribute to the development of "best practice" recommendations to guide physiotherapists in delegating clinical work to physiotherapy support workers for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Dataset Information

What is a Good Death? A Choice Experiment on Care Indicators for Patients at End of Life.

Context

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

What is a Good Death? A Choice Experiment on Care Indicators for Patients at End of Life.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets