Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Most of us would regard killing another person as morally wrong, but when the death of one saves multiple others, it can be morally permitted. According to a prominent computational dual-systems framework, in these life-and-death dilemmas, deontological (nonsacrificial) moral judgments stem from a model-free algorithm that emphasizes the intrinsic value of the sacrificial action, while utilitarian (sacrificial) moral judgments are derived from a model-based algorithm that emphasizes the outcome of the sacrificial action. Rodent decision-making research suggests that the model-based algorithm depends on the basolateral amygdala (BLA), but these findings have not yet been translated to human moral decision-making. Here, in five humans with selective, bilateral BLA damage, we show a breakdown
SUBMITTER: van Honk J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9351380 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA