Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background & aims
Clinical guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening suggest use of either stool-based tests or colonoscopy - modalities that differ in recommended screening intervals, adherence, and costs. We know little about the long-term cost differences in population-health outreach strategies to promote these strategies.Methods
We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare 2 mailed outreach strategies to increase CRC screening from a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial: mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits vs invitations to complete a screening colonoscopy. We built a 10-year Markov chain Monte Carlo microsimulation model to account for differences in screening intervals, adherence, and costs.Results
Mailed FIT kits had a lower 10-year a
SUBMITTER: Kapinos KA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9357235 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature