Dataset Information

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A bioprosthesis- or mechanical-prosthesis-containing polyester graft (composite graft) is standard surgical management for aortic root aneurysms (Bentall procedure), but particularly in the young patient in whom a bioprosthesis is likely to deteriorate and a mechanical prosthesis mandates life-long anticoagulation, valve-sparing procedures have been devised. One such procedure involves reimplantation of the native aortic valve in the polyester graft. With focus on selecting the optimum procedure for young relatively asymptomatic patients, we compared outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve versus the Bentall procedure and identified factors influencing outcomes.

Methods

From January 2000 to January 2017, 643 adults age ≤ 70 with tricuspid aortic valves underwent elective aortic root replacement with either reimplantation (n = 448/70%) or a composite valve graft (Bentall) procedure (n = 195/30%). Outcomes were compared in 100 propensity-matched pairs.

Results

Patients with fewer symptoms, less aortic regurgitation (AR), higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio had a higher likelihood of valve repair with reimplantation (all p < 0.02) versus receiving a Bentall procedure. Operative mortality was 0.16% (reimplantation, 1/448, 0.22%; Bentall 0/195, 0%). After reimplantation, 8-year freedom from severe AR was 95% and 10-year freedom from reintervention was 98%. Ten-year survival was 95%. Higher preoperative AR grade (p < 0.0001) but not larger root diameter (p = 0.3) was associated with higher grade of late regurgitation after a reimplantation procedure. Among propensity-matched patients, reimplantation compared with a Bentall was associated with similar 10-year survival (89% vs. 94%), but more late AR (8-year freedom from severe AR: 93% vs. 99.9%) and greater early reduction in, but similar late, left ventricular mass (104 vs. 105 g•m^-2 at 8 years).

Conclusion

Excellent aortic valve reimplantation results versus Bentall lead us to recommend reimplantation more often in patients who present with even moderately severe or severe AR and significantly enlarged aortic roots.

SUBMITTER: Svensson LG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9357471 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.

Svensson Lars G LG Rosinski Brad F BF Tucker Nicholas J NJ Gillinov A Marc AM Rajeswaran Jeevanantham J Roselli Eric E EE Johnston Douglas R DR Desai Milind Y MY Griffin Brian P BP Blackstone Eugene H EH

Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) 20220401 2

<h4>Background</h4> A bioprosthesis- or mechanical-prosthesis-containing polyester graft (composite graft) is standard surgical management for aortic root aneurysms (Bentall procedure), but particularly in the young patient in whom a bioprosthesis is likely to deteriorate and a mechanical prosthesis mandates life-long anticoagulation, valve-sparing procedures have been devised. One such procedure involves reimplantation of the native aortic valve in the polyester graft. With focus on selecting t ...[more]

PMID: 35933986

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPulmonary autograft reinforcement to prevent dilatation and subsequent neo-aortic valve regurgitation has been reported; however, data on long-term function of the neo-aortic valve after this modified Ross procedure are lacking. Our objective here was to assess long-term outcomes of the modified Ross procedure with autograft reinforcement using the reimplantation technique.PatientsThe outcomes of 61 consecutive patients managed using the Dacron-conduit reinforced Ross procedure between 2009 and 2021 were reviewed. Most patients had a unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve (n = 52; 85%), predominant aortic valve regurgitation (n = 42; 77%), and >30 mm dilatation of the ascending aorta (n = 33; 54%). A prior aortic valve procedure was noted in 47 patients (77%) patients, including 38 (62%) with surgical repair and 9 (15%) with balloon dilatation. The pulmonary autograft was reimplanted within a Dacron conduit with a median diameter of 25.6 mm (range, 20-30 mm) using the David valve-sparing aortic root replacement technique.ResultsAll patients survived. The median age at surgery was 16.8 years (range, 6-38 years). Neo-aortic valve replacement was required in 3 patients (4.9%; 95% CI, 0.34%- 12.7%) because of infective endocarditis, left ventricular false aneurysm, and leaflet perforation, respectively; the repeat procedure was done early in 2 of these patients (2 of 61; 3%). Six patients required right ventricular outflow conduit replacement, 5 by surgery and 1 percutaneously. The median duration of follow-up was 90 months (range, 10-124 months). The 5- and 10-year rates of reintervention-free survival were 84.3% (95% CI, 74%-95%) and 81.6% (95% CI, 72%-93%), respectively, and 5-year survival without aortic reintervention was 94.5% (95% CI, 88%-100%), with little change at 10 years. No patients experienced deterioration of initial neo-aortic valve function (ie, regurgitation or stenosis).ConclusionsAutograft reinforcement using the reimplantation technique allowed expansion of Ross procedure indications to all patients requiring aortic valve replacement and prevented neo-aortic root dilatation. Failures were uncommon. Long-term follow-up data showed stable neo-aortic valve function.

Project description:Purpose: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performances of multimodal imaging [i.e., white blood cell single-photon emission computed tomography/CT (99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT) and 18-fluoride-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT ([18F]FDG PET/CT)] in patients with suspected infection after the Bentall procedure, proposing new specific diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis. Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2019, we selected within a cardiovascular infections registry, 76 surgically treated patients (27 women and 49 men, median 66 years, and range 29-83 years). All the patients underwent molecular imaging for a suspected infection after the replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta according to the Bentall procedure. We analyzed 98 scans including 49 99mTc-WBC and 49 [18F]FDG PET/CT. A total of 22 patients with very early/early suspected infection (<3 months after surgery) were imaged with both the techniques. Positive imaging was classified according to the anatomical site of increased uptake: to the aortic valve (AV), to both the AV and AV tube graft (AVTG) or to the TG, to surrounding tissue, and/or to extracardiac sites (embolic events or other sites of concomitant infection). Standard clinical workup included in all the patients having echocardiography/CT, blood culture, and the Duke criteria. Pretest probability and positive/negative likelihood ratio were calculated. Sensitivity and specificity of 99mTc labeled hexamethylpropylene amine oxime-WBC SPECT/CT (99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT) and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging were calculated by using microbiology (n = 35) or clinical follow-up (n = 41) as final diagnosis. 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scintigraphy and [18F]FDG PET/CT findings were compared with 95% CIs by using the McNemar test to those of echocardiography/CT, blood culture, and the Duke criteria. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC were 86, 92, and 88%, respectively, with a slightly higher sensitivity for tube graft infection (TGI) as compared to isolated AV and combined AVTG. Overall, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT were 97, 73, and 90%, respectively. In 22 patients with suspected very early and early postsurgical infections, the two imaging modalities were concordant in 17 cases [10 true positive (TP) and 7 true negative (TN)]. [18F]FDG PET/CT presented a higher sensitivity than 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scan. 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC scan correctly classified as negative three false-positive (FP) PET/CT findings. Conclusion: Our findings supported the use of 99mTc-HMPAO-WBC SPECT/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspicion infection after the Bentall procedure early in the course of the disease onset to confirm the diagnosis and provide a comprehensive assessment of disease burden through the proposed criteria.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets