Dataset Information

Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Discover Interactions in an Ecological Model for Obesity.

ABSTRACT: Ecological theories suggest that environmental, social, and individual factors interact to cause obesity. Yet, many analytic techniques, such as multilevel modeling, require manual specification of interacting factors, making them inept in their ability to search for interactions. This paper shows evidence that an explainable artificial intelligence approach, commonly employed in genomics research, can address this problem. The method entails using random intersection trees to decode interactions learned by random forest models. Here, this approach is used to extract interactions between features of a multi-level environment from random forest models of waist-to-height ratios using 11,112 participants from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. This study shows that methods used to discover interactions between genes can also discover interacting features of the environment that impact obesity. This new approach to modeling ecosystems may help shine a spotlight on combinations of environmental features that are important to obesity, as well as other health outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Allen B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9367834 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Discover Interactions in an Ecological Model for Obesity.

Allen Ben B Lane Morgan M Steeves Elizabeth Anderson EA Raynor Hollie H

International journal of environmental research and public health 20220802 15

Ecological theories suggest that environmental, social, and individual factors interact to cause obesity. Yet, many analytic techniques, such as multilevel modeling, require manual specification of interacting factors, making them inept in their ability to search for interactions. This paper shows evidence that an explainable artificial intelligence approach, commonly employed in genomics research, can address this problem. The method entails using random intersection trees to decode interaction ...[more]

PMID: 35954804

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveMachine learning (ML) models are increasingly being utilized in oncology research for use in the clinic. However, while more complicated models may provide improvements in predictive or prognostic power, a hurdle to their adoption are limits of model interpretability, wherein the inner workings can be perceived as a "black box". Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) frameworks including Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are novel, model-agnostic approaches that aim to provide insight into the inner workings of the "black box" by producing quantitative visualizations of how model predictions are calculated. In doing so, XAI can transform complicated ML models into easily understandable charts and interpretable sets of rules, which can give providers with an intuitive understanding of the knowledge generated, thus facilitating the deployment of such models in routine clinical workflows.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive, non-systematic review of the latest literature to define use cases of model-agnostic XAI frameworks in oncologic research. The examined database was PubMed/MEDLINE. The last search was run on May 1, 2022.Key content and findingsIn this review, we identified several fields in oncology research where ML models and XAI were utilized to improve interpretability, including prognostication, diagnosis, radiomics, pathology, treatment selection, radiation treatment workflows, and epidemiology. Within these fields, XAI facilitates determination of feature importance in the overall model, visualization of relationships and/or interactions, evaluation of how individual predictions are produced, feature selection, identification of prognostic and/or predictive thresholds, and overall confidence in the models, among other benefits. These examples provide a basis for future work to expand on, which can facilitate adoption in the clinic when the complexity of such modeling would otherwise be prohibitive.ConclusionsModel-agnostic XAI frameworks offer an intuitive and effective means of describing oncology ML models, with applications including prognostication and determination of optimal treatment regimens. Using such frameworks presents an opportunity to improve understanding of ML models, which is a critical step to their adoption in the clinic.

Project description:Cardiovascular diseases and their associated disorder of heart failure (HF) are major causes of death globally, making it a priority for doctors to detect and predict their onset and medical consequences. Artificial Intelligence (AI) allows doctors to discover clinical indicators and enhance their diagnoses and treatments. Specifically, “eXplainable AI” (XAI) offers tools to improve the clinical prediction models that experience poor interpretability of their results. This work presents an explainability analysis and evaluation of two HF survival prediction models using a dataset that includes 299 patients who have experienced HF. The first model utilizes survival analysis, considering death events and time as target features, while the second model approaches the problem as a classification task to predict death. The model employs an optimization data workflow pipeline capable of selecting the best machine learning algorithm as well as the optimal collection of features. Moreover, different post hoc techniques have been used for the explainability analysis of the model. The main contribution of this paper is an explainability-driven approach to select the best HF survival prediction model balancing prediction performance and explainability. Therefore, the most balanced explainable prediction models are Survival Gradient Boosting model for the survival analysis and Random Forest for the classification approach with a c-index of 0.714 and balanced accuracy of 0.74 (std 0.03) respectively. The selection of features by the SCI-XAI in the two models is similar where “serum_creatinine”, “ejection_fraction”, and “sex” are selected in both approaches, with the addition of “diabetes” for the survival analysis model. Moreover, the application of post hoc XAI techniques also confirm common findings from both approaches by placing the “serum_creatinine” as the most relevant feature for the predicted outcome, followed by “ejection_fraction”. The explainable prediction models for HF survival presented in this paper would improve the further adoption of clinical prediction models by providing doctors with insights to better understand the reasoning behind usually “black-box” AI clinical solutions and make more reasonable and data-driven decisions.

Dataset Information

Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Discover Interactions in an Ecological Model for Obesity.

Publications

Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Discover Interactions in an Ecological Model for Obesity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets