Ten quick tips for biomarker discovery and validation analyses using machine learning.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Diaz-Uriarte R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9371329 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Ten quick tips for biomarker discovery and validation analyses using machine learning.
Diaz-Uriarte Ramon R Gómez de Lope Elisa E Giugno Rosalba R Fröhlich Holger H Nazarov Petr V PV Nepomuceno-Chamorro Isabel A IA Rauschenberger Armin A Glaab Enrico E
PLoS computational biology 20220811 8
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6586259 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Research data is accumulating rapidly and with it the challenge of fully reproducible science. As a consequence, implementation of high-quality management of scientific data has become a global priority. The FAIR (Findable, Accesible, Interoperable and Reusable) principles provide practical guidelines for maximizing the value of research data; however, processing data using workflows-systematic executions of a series of computational tools-is equally important for good data management. The FAIR principles have recently been adapted to Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles) to promote the reproducibility and reusability of any type of research software. Here, we propose a set of 10 quick tips, drafted by experienced workflow developers that will help researchers to apply FAIR4RS principles to workflows. The tips have been arranged according to the FAIR acronym, clarifying the purpose of each tip with respect to the FAIR4RS principles. Altogether, these tips can be seen as practical guidelines for workflow developers who aim to contribute to more reproducible and sustainable computational science, aiming to positively impact the open science and FAIR community.
| S-EPMC10538699 | biostudies-literature
Project description:As sequencing prices drop, genomic data accumulates-seemingly at a steadily increasing pace. Most genomic data potentially have value beyond the initial purpose-but only if shared with the scientific community. This, of course, is often easier said than done. Some of the challenges in sharing genomic data include data volume (raw file sizes and number of files), complexities, formats, nomenclatures, metadata descriptions, and the choice of a repository. In this paper, we describe 10 quick tips for sharing open genomic data.
| S-EPMC6307697 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis induces different immunological cascades, involving a plethora of immune cells as well as keratinocytes. 96 patients were investigated using mRNA microarray experiments, of which 88 passed our QC criteria. Patients were topically exposed to allergens (nickel (Ni), epoxy resin (EP) and methylchloroisothiazolinone (CM)), irritants (sodium lauryl sulfate (SL) and nonanoic acid (NO)) for 48 hours or were left untreated.
2020-09-01 | E-MTAB-9501 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10414555 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of this quick guide is to help new modelers who have little or no background in comparative modeling yet are keen to produce high-resolution protein 3D structures for their study by following systematic good modeling practices, using affordable personal computers or online computational resources. Through the available experimental 3D-structure repositories, the modeler should be able to access and use the atomic coordinates for building homology models. We also aim to provide the modeler with a rationale behind making a simple list of atomic coordinates suitable for computational analysis abiding to principles of physics (e.g., molecular mechanics). Keeping that objective in mind, these quick tips cover the process of homology modeling and some postmodeling computations such as molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD). A brief section was left for modeling nonprotein molecules, and a short case study of homology modeling is discussed.
| S-EPMC7117658 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Most studies in the life sciences and other disciplines involve generating and analyzing numerical data of some type as the foundation for scientific findings. Working with numerical data involves multiple challenges. These include reproducible data acquisition, appropriate data storage, computationally correct data analysis, appropriate reporting and presentation of the results, and suitable data interpretation. Finding and correcting mistakes when analyzing and interpreting data can be frustrating and time-consuming. Presenting or publishing incorrect results is embarrassing but not uncommon. Particular sources of errors are inappropriate use of statistical methods and incorrect interpretation of data by software. To detect mistakes as early as possible, one should frequently check intermediate and final results for plausibility. Clearly documenting how quantities and results were obtained facilitates correcting mistakes. Properly understanding data is indispensable for reaching well-founded conclusions from experimental results. Units are needed to make sense of numbers, and uncertainty should be estimated to know how meaningful results are. Descriptive statistics and significance testing are useful tools for interpreting numerical results if applied correctly. However, blindly trusting in computed numbers can also be misleading, so it is worth thinking about how data should be summarized quantitatively to properly answer the question at hand. Finally, a suitable form of presentation is needed so that the data can properly support the interpretation and findings. By additionally sharing the relevant data, others can access, understand, and ultimately make use of the results. These quick tips are intended to provide guidelines for correctly interpreting, efficiently analyzing, and presenting numerical data in a useful way.
| S-EPMC6181270 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn recent years, human microbiome studies have received increasing attention as this field is considered a potential source for clinical applications. With the advancements in omics technologies and AI, research focused on the discovery for potential biomarkers in the human microbiome using machine learning tools has produced positive outcomes. Despite the promising results, several issues can still be found in these studies such as datasets with small number of samples, inconsistent results, lack of uniform processing and methodologies, and other additional factors lead to lack of reproducibility in biomedical research. In this work, we propose a methodology that combines the DADA2 pipeline for 16s rRNA sequences processing and the Recursive Ensemble Feature Selection (REFS) in multiple datasets to increase reproducibility and obtain robust and reliable results in biomedical research.ResultsThree experiments were performed analyzing microbiome data from patients/cases in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). In each experiment, we found a biomarker signature in one dataset and applied to 2 other as further validation. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology was compared with other feature selection methods such as K-Best with F-score and random selection as a base line. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was employed as a measure of diagnostic accuracy and used as a metric for comparing the results of the proposed methodology with other feature selection methods. Additionally, we use the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) as a metric to evaluate the performance of the methodology as well as for comparison with other feature selection methods.ConclusionsWe developed a methodology for reproducible biomarker discovery for 16s rRNA microbiome sequence analysis, addressing the issues related with data dimensionality, inconsistent results and validation across independent datasets. The findings from the three experiments, across 9 different datasets, show that the proposed methodology achieved higher accuracy compared to other feature selection methods. This methodology is a first approach to increase reproducibility, to provide robust and reliable results.
| S-EPMC10789030 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or heart attack is a significant global health threat and one of the leading causes of death. The evolution of machine learning has greatly revamped the risk stratification and death prediction of AMI. In this study, an integrated feature selection and machine learning approach was used to identify potential biomarkers for early detection and treatment of AMI. First, feature selection was conducted and evaluated before all classification tasks with machine learning. Full classification models (using all 62 features) and reduced classification models (using various feature selection methods ranging from 5 to 30 features) were built and evaluated using six machine learning classification algorithms. The results showed that the reduced models performed generally better (mean AUPRC via random forest (RF) algorithm for recursive feature elimination (RFE) method ranges from 0.8048 to 0.8260, while for random forest importance (RFI) method, it ranges from 0.8301 to 0.8505) than the full models (mean AUPRC via RF: 0.8044). The most notable finding of this study was the identification of a five-feature model that included cardiac troponin I, HDL cholesterol, HbA1c, anion gap, and albumin, which had achieved comparable results (mean AUPRC via RF: 0.8462) as to the models that containing more features. These five features were proven by the previous studies as significant risk factors for AMI or cardiovascular disease and could be used as potential biomarkers to predict the prognosis of AMI patients. From the medical point of view, fewer features for diagnosis or prognosis could reduce the cost and time of a patient as lesser clinical and pathological tests are needed.
| S-EPMC10191821 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cellular senescence is a stress response involved in ageing and diverse disease processes including cancer, type-2 diabetes, osteoarthritis and viral infection. Despite growing interest in targeted elimination of senescent cells, only few senolytics are known due to the lack of well-characterised molecular targets. Here, we report the discovery of three senolytics using cost-effective machine learning algorithms trained solely on published data. We computationally screened various chemical libraries and validated the senolytic action of ginkgetin, periplocin and oleandrin in human cell lines under various modalities of senescence. The compounds have potency comparable to known senolytics, and we show that oleandrin has improved potency over its target as compared to best-in-class alternatives. Our approach led to several hundred-fold reduction in drug screening costs and demonstrates that artificial intelligence can take maximum advantage of small and heterogeneous drug screening data, paving the way for new open science approaches to early-stage drug discovery.
| S-EPMC10257182 | biostudies-literature