Dataset Information

Does Water Quality Matter for Life Quality? A Study of the Impact of Water Quality on Well-being in a Coastal Community.

ABSTRACT: Most studies of life quality are concentrated on a country-level scale, while local differences within a country or area are less studied. Thus, the effect of the environment on life quality on a local scale remains understudied and is often represented by one generalized common factor. In this study, we investigated the effect of an objectively measured environmental quality variable and subjective reflections of this (perceptions of environmental quality) in relation to life quality in a coastal community. Hence, we tested the effect of objective and subjective water quality measures using a model, accounting for other traditional variables (e.g., income and health) that predict life quality variations. Our findings indicate that perceptions of the environment are strongly associated with life quality, whereas objectively measured environmental quality is associated with life quality to a lesser extent. Thus, our results suggest that the impact of the environment on life quality is mediated via the way the environment is perceived (psychological effects) and less by the actual conditions of the environment.

SUBMITTER: Gunko R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9381611 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does Water Quality Matter for Life Quality? A Study of the Impact of Water Quality on Well-being in a Coastal Community.

Gunko Ruslan R Rapeli Lauri L Vuorisalo Timo T Scheinin Matias M Karell Patrik P

Environmental management 20220625 3

Most studies of life quality are concentrated on a country-level scale, while local differences within a country or area are less studied. Thus, the effect of the environment on life quality on a local scale remains understudied and is often represented by one generalized common factor. In this study, we investigated the effect of an objectively measured environmental quality variable and subjective reflections of this (perceptions of environmental quality) in relation to life quality in a coast ...[more]

PMID: 35751661

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA subset of patients experience persisting symptoms after an acute COVID-19 infection, referred to as "post COVID-19 condition". This cross-sectional study aimed to compare symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), fatigue, mental well-being, and determinants of diminished HRQoL, between patients with post COVID-19 condition categorized by time since acute infection.MethodsWe performed an online survey and analyzed responses of 10,194 adult respondents with a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection, who experienced persisting symptoms ≥3 months after the initial infection. The most debilitating symptoms and health outcomes were studied separately for respondents 3-6, 7-9, 10-12, 13-18, 19-24, and >24 months after acute infection.ResultsAt each time period, fatigue, sensory-processing problems, and concentration problems were the most debilitating symptoms reported by respondents, although the proportion of respondents who reported these symptoms differed significantly between time periods. Respondents 3-6 months post-acute infection had the lowest HRQoL (median EQ-5D utility score: 0.59), the highest fatigue level (median score: 110.0) and the highest proportion with a likely depressive disorder (32.4%), whereas respondents 13-18 months post-infection had the highest HRQoL (0.65), the lowest fatigue level (106.0), and the second lowest proportion with a likely depressive disorder (25.0%) (p = 0.000-0.007). Compared to those 13-18 and 19-24 months post-infection, respondents >24 months post-infection had a slightly lower HRQoL (0.60), lower fatigue level (108.0), and lower proportion with a likely depressive disorder (29.2%), although only the differences in HRQoL were statistically significant (p = 0.001-0.010). Younger age, female gender, lower level of education, not having paid work before COVID-19, comorbidity, and not being vaccinated, seemed to be associated with lower HRQoL.ConclusionRegardless of time since infection, respondents considered fatigue, sensory processing problems and concentration problems the most debilitating symptoms. They experienced a low HRQoL and severe fatigue, even more than two years after acute COVID-19 infection. Respondents 3-6 months post-infection had the worst health outcomes, whereas respondents 13-18 months post-infection had the best outcomes, indicating that, at least for a subgroup of patients, health status may improve over time.

Dataset Information

Does Water Quality Matter for Life Quality? A Study of the Impact of Water Quality on Well-being in a Coastal Community.

Publications

Does Water Quality Matter for Life Quality? A Study of the Impact of Water Quality on Well-being in a Coastal Community.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets