Dataset Information

Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

ABSTRACT: We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify expert agreements. We generated volumes with a confidence level of 80% to compare the maximum distance to each CTV in six directions. The degree of agreement was moderate; overall kappa values were 0.573 for distal EBDC, 0.513 for proximal EBDC, and 0.511 for GBC. In the distal EBDC, a larger variation was noted in the right, post, and inferior direction. In the proximal EBDC, all borders except the right and left direction showed a larger variation. In the GBC, a larger variation was found in the anterior, posterior, and inferior direction. The posterior and inferior borders were the common area having discrepancies, associated with the insufficient coverage of the paraaortic node. A consensus guideline is needed to reduce inter-clinician variability in the CTVs and adequate coverage of regional lymph node area.

SUBMITTER: Koo T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9436049 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

Koo Taeryool T Cheong Kwang-Ho KH Kim Kyubo K Park Hae Jin HJ Park Younghee Y Koh Hyeon Kang HK Kim Byoung Hyuck BH Kim Eunji E Kim Kyung Su KS Choi Jin Hwa JH

PloS one 20220901 9

We aimed to evaluate the inter-clinician variability in the clinical target volume (CTV) for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) including extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). Nine experienced radiation oncologists delineated PORT CTVs for distal EBDC (pT2N1), proximal EBDC (pT2bN1) and GBC (pT2bN1) patients. The expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) was used to quantify exper ...[more]

PMID: 36048817

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the potential benefits of FDG PET radiomic feature maps (RFMs) for target delineation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiotherapy.MethodsThirty-two NSCLC patients undergoing FDG PET/CT imaging were included. For each patient, nine grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) RFMs were generated. gross target volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) were contoured on CT (GTVCT , CTVCT ), PET (GTVPET40 , CTVPET40 ), and RFMs (GTVRFM , CTVRFM ,). Intratumoral heterogeneity areas were segmented as GTVPET50-Boost and radiomic boost target volume (RTVBoost ) on PET and RFMs, respectively. GTVCT in homogenous tumors and GTVPET40 in heterogeneous tumors were considered as GTVgold standard (GTVGS ). One-way analysis of variance was conducted to determine the threshold that finds the best conformity for GTVRFM with GTVGS . Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) were calculated. Linear regression analysis was employed to report the correlations between the gold standard and RFM-derived target volumes.ResultsEntropy, contrast, and Haralick correlation (H-correlation) were selected for tumor segmentation. The threshold values of 80%, 50%, and 10% have the best conformity of GTVRFM-entropy , GTVRFM-contrast , and GTVRFM-H-correlation with GTVGS , respectively. The linear regression results showed a positive correlation between GTVGS and GTVRFM-entropy (r = 0.98, p < 0.001), between GTVGS and GTVRFM-contrast (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), and between GTVGS and GTVRFM-H-correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.001). The average threshold values of 45% and 15% were resulted in the best segmentation matching between CTVRFM-entropy and CTVRFM-contrast with CTVGS , respectively. Moreover, we used RFM to determine RTVBoost in the heterogeneous tumors. Comparison of RTVBoost with GTVPET50-Boost MAPE showed the volume error differences of 31.7%, 36%, and 34.7% in RTVBoost-entropy , RTVBoost-contrast , and RTVBoost-H-correlation , respectively.ConclusionsFDG PET-based radiomics features in NSCLC demonstrated a promising potential for decision support in radiotherapy, helping radiation oncologists delineate tumors and generate accurate segmentation for heterogeneous region of tumors.

Project description:ObjectiveDelineation of treatment volumes is a major source of uncertainties in radiotherapy (RT). This is also true for rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant RT, with a potential impact on treatment quality. We investigated the role of the digital platform Anatom-e (Anatom-e Information Sytems Ltd., Houston, Texas) in increasing the compliance to follow a specific treatment protocol in a multicentric setting.Materials and methodsTwo clinical cases of locally advanced rectal cancer were chosen. Participants were instructed to follow the 2009 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus atlas and asked to manually segment clinical target volumes (CTVs), for both patient 1 and 2, on day 1 with and without the use of Anatom-e. After one week (day 2), the same radiation oncologist contoured again, with and without Anatom-e, the same CT series. Intraobserver (Intra-OV) and interobserver (Inter-OV) variability were evaluated with the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean distance to agreement (MDA).ResultsFor clinical case 1, no significant difference was found for Intra-OV and Inter-OV. For clinical case 2, no significant difference was found for Intra-OV but a statistically significant difference was found for Inter-OV in DSC when using or not the platform. Mean DCS was 0.65 (SD: ±0.64; range: 0.58-0.79) for day 1 vs reference volume without Anatom-e and 0.72 (SD: ±0.39; range: 0.67-0.77) (p = 0.03) with it. Mean MDA was lower with Anatom-e (3.61; SD: ±1.33; range: 2.85-4.78) than without (4.14; SD: ±2.97; range: 2.18-5.21), with no statistical significance (p = 0.21) The use of Anatom-e decreased the SD from 2.97 to 1.33. Mean HD was lower with Anatom-e (26.06; SD: ±2.05; range: 24.08-32.62), with no statistical significance (p = 0.14) compared to that without (31.39; SD: ±1.31; range: 26.14-48.72).ConclusionsThe use of Anatom-e decreased the Inter-OV in the CTV delineation process for locally advanced rectal cancer with complex disease presentation planned for neoadjuvant RT. This system may be potentially helpful in increasing the compliance to follow shared guidelines and protocols.

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine interobserver variability in axillary nodal contouring in breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy (RT) by comparing the clinical target volume of participating single centres (SC-CTV) with a gold-standard CTV (GS-CTV).MethodsThe GS-CTV of three patients (P1, P2, P3) with increasing complexity was created in DICOM format from the median contour of axillary CTVs drawn by BC experts, validated using the simultaneous truth and performance-level estimation and peer-reviewed. GS-CTVs were compared with the correspondent SC-CTVs drawn by radiation oncologists, using validated metrics and a total score (TS) integrating all of them.ResultsEighteen RT centres participated in the study. Comparative analyses revealed that, on average, the SC-CTVs were smaller than GS-CTV for P1 and P2 (by -29.25% and -27.83%, respectively) and larger for P3 (by +12.53%). The mean Jaccard index was greater for P1 and P2 compared to P3, but the overlap extent value was around 0.50 or less. Regarding nodal levels, L4 showed the highest concordance with the GS. In the intra-patient comparison, L2 and L3 achieved lower TS than L4. Nodal levels showed discrepancy with GS, which was not statistically significant for P1, and negligible for P2, while P3 had the worst agreement. DICE similarity coefficient did not exceed the minimum threshold for agreement of 0.70 in all the measurements.ConclusionsSubstantial differences were observed between SC- and GS-CTV, especially for P3 with altered arm setup. L2 and L3 were the most critical levels. The study highlighted these key points to address.Advances in knowledgeThe present study compares, by means of validated geometric indexes, manual segmentations of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer from different observers and different institutions made on radiotherapy planning CT images. Assessing such variability is of paramount importance, as geometric uncertainties might lead to incorrect dosimetry and compromise oncological outcome.

Dataset Information

Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

Publications

Variation in clinical target volume delineation in postoperative radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets