Dataset Information

The Efficacy and Safety of New-Generation Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-Related Dry Eye: A Multicenter, Randomized, Patients-Blind, Parallel-Control, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new-generation intense pulsed light (IPL) device in improving the symptoms and signs of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related dry eye, and compare it with a traditional IPL device.

Methods

This multicenter randomized controlled trial enrolled 132 patients with MGD-related dry eye from two centers. Patients were randomly assigned into the new-generation IPL (Eyesis) group or traditional IPL (E-Eye) group, and then blinded to receive treatment on days 0 and 7. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear meniscus height (TMH), tear breakup time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), Schirmer test, and meibomian gland signs were evaluated on days 0, 7, and 14. The primary outcome was defined as the effective rate of treating MGD at day 14. Any adverse events were recorded for safety assessment. Intergroup comparisons and non-inferiority analysis were performed. p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Basic information showed no significant difference between treatment groups. The intergroup difference of the effective rate was - 1.7% in the left eye and 1.6% in right eye, verifying the non-inferiority of the Eyesis device (p = 0.927). Significant improvements in OSDI, TBUT, Schirmer test, TMH, CFS, and meibomian gland signs were observed in Eyesis group on days 7 and 14 (all p < 0.05). Compared to the E-Eye group, the Eyesis group achieved more significant improvements in OSDI, TBUT, Schirmer test, TMH, and meibum quality (all p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidences of adverse events between groups (p = 1.000).

Conclusions

The new-generation IPL was effective and safe in relieving the symptoms and signs of MGD-related dry eye, exhibiting a non-inferior effective rate compared to the traditional IPL. Additionally, Eyesis showed more clinical benefits over E-Eye in alleviating symptoms, increasing tear film stability and improving meibomian gland function.

SUBMITTER: Jiang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9437192 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Efficacy and Safety of New-Generation Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-Related Dry Eye: A Multicenter, Randomized, Patients-Blind, Parallel-Control, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

Jiang Xiaodan X Yuan Hao H Zhang Mingzhou M Lv Huibin H Chou Yilin Y Yang Jiarui J Li Xuemin X

Ophthalmology and therapy 20220816 5

<h4>Introduction</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new-generation intense pulsed light (IPL) device in improving the symptoms and signs of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related dry eye, and compare it with a traditional IPL device.<h4>Methods</h4>This multicenter randomized controlled trial enrolled 132 patients with MGD-related dry eye from two centers. Patients were randomly assigned into the new-generation IPL (Eyesis) group or traditional IPL (E-Eye) group, an ...[more]

PMID: 35974296

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the comparative efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy alone with that of IPL plus meibomian gland expression (MGX) for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).MethodsThis is a prospective randomized crossover clinical trial. Sixty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. All of patients underwent four treatment sessions in total, which were two weeks apart. Group 1 underwent two sessions of IPL therapy with MGX, as well as two sessions of IPL alone. Group 2 received two sessions of IPL therapy alone, and two sessions of IPL therapy with MGX. The following parameters were measured at baseline (BL), 2 weeks after the second treatment session (FU1), and 2 weeks after the fourth treatment session (FU2): tearfilm break-up time (BUT), Oxford grade for corneal staining, meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), meibum quality (MQ), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI). The separate effect of MGX on improvement of MGD parameters was evaluated using generalized estimating equation (GEE).ResultsThe mean age of the participants was 57.52 ± 10.50 years. The BUT, Oxford grade, MGE, MQ, and OSDI of both groups improved significantly (from baseline) by the end of four treatment sessions (FU2 compared to BL; all p-values <0.05). The MGE and MQ significantly improved after the first and second treatment sessions (FU1 compare to BL; all p-values < 0.001). However, the improvement was not statistically significant after the third and fourth treatment sessions (FU2 compared to FU1; p-value of 0.388 for MGE and 0.645 for MQ in group 1, 0.333 for MGE and 0.333 for MQ in group 2). The IPL plus MGX therapy produced greater improvements in the BUT scores than did IPL therapy alone (p = 0.003 by GEE). In contrast, the Oxford grade, MGE, MQ, and OSDI were not influenced by the addition of MGX to IPL (p = 0.642, 0.663, 0.731, and 0.840, respectively by GEE).ConclusionIPL therapy effectively improves the subjective symptoms and objective ocular findings of MGD. MGX enhanced the improvement of BUT driven by IPL therapy. The meibomian gland function (MGE and MQ) recovers faster in response to IPL therapy than did the other parameters.

Project description:PurposeTo compare the safety and efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX), against monotherapy of MGX.MethodsPatients with moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were 1:1 randomized to 4 sessions of intense pulse light + MGX at 2-week intervals, or 4 sessions of Sham + MGX at 2-week intervals. Both patients and examiners were blinded to the allocation. Outcome measures, evaluated at the baseline (BL) and at a follow-up (FU) conducted 4 weeks after the last IPL session, included fluorescein tear breakup time (TBUT) as the primary outcome measure, OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, Eye Dryness Score (EDS, a visual analog scale (VAS)-based questionnaire), Meibomian gland score (MGS, a score of meibum expressibility and quality in 15 glands on the lower eyelid), daily use of artificial tears, and daily use of warm compresses. In addition, during each treatment session, the number of expressible glands was counted in both eyelids, the predominant quality of meibum was estimated in both eyelids, and the level of pain/discomfort due to MGX and IPL was recorded.ResultsTBUT increased from 3.8±0.2 (μ±standard error of mean (SEM)) to 4.5±0.3 seconds in the control arm, and from 4.0±0.2 to 6.0±0.3 in the study arm. The difference between arms was statistically significant (P < .01). Other signs/symptoms which improved in both arms but were greater in the study arm included MGS (P < .001), EDS (P < .01), the number of expressible glands in the lower eyelids (P < .0001) and upper eyelid (P < .0001), the predominant meibum quality in the lower eyelid (P < .0001) and upper eyelid (P < .0001), and the level of pain due to MGX (P < .0001). Outcome measures which improved in both arms with no significant differences between the two were OSDI (P = .9984), and the daily use of artificial tears (P = .8216). Meibography, daily use of warm compresses, and severity of skin rosacea did not show statistically significant changes in either arm. No serious adverse events were observed. There was a slight tendency for more adverse events in the control group (P = 0.06).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that, in patients with moderate to severe symptoms, combination therapy of intense pulse light (IPL) and meibomian gland expression (MGX) could be a safe and useful approach for improving signs of dry eye disease (DED) due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Future studies are needed to elucidate if and how such improvements can be generalized to different severity levels of MGD.

Project description:BackgroundDry eye disease (DED), Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease (SS-DED) are eye dryness conditions that show significant overlap in various symptoms of ocular discomfort. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the patient experience and evaluate content validity of the newly developed Dry Eye Disease Questionnaire (DED-Q).MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 61 US adults who reported experiencing ocular symptoms due to their physician-confirmed primary diagnosis of DED (n = 21), MGD (n = 20), or SS-DED (n = 20). The open-ended concept-elicitation phase was followed by cognitive debriefing (CD) of the DED-Q to evaluate participants' understanding and relevance of the instructions, items, response options, and recall periods. Interviews were also conducted with eight specialist healthcare professionals to assess clinical relevance of the concepts included. Verbatim interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis in ATLAS.ti v8 software.ResultsA total of 29 symptoms and 14 impacts on quality of life were reported across participant interviews. Primary ocular symptoms reported included eye dryness (n = 61/61; 100%), eye irritation (n = 55/61; 90%), eye itch (n = 54/61; 89%), burning sensation (n = 52/61; 85%), and foreign body sensation (n = 51/61; 84%). The most impacted aspects of daily life were using digital screens (n = 46/61; 75%), driving (n = 45/61; 74%), working (n = 39/61; 64%), and reading (n = 37/61; 61%). CD findings showed most participants had good understanding of DED-Q items and confirmed most concepts were relevant to the lived experience of their condition. Aside from few minor changes to the items and examples to facilitate more accurate interpretation, the proposed instruction wording was modified for various symptom and impact modules to encourage participants to focus only on dry eye vision problems.ConclusionsThis research identified multiple prevalent symptoms and impacts of DED, MGD, and SS-DED, most of which were similar across the conditions. The DED-Q was confirmed to be a content-valid PRO measure suitable for use in clinical studies to assess the patient experience of DED, MGD, and SS-DED. Future work will focus on evaluating the psychometric properties of the DED-Q for use as an efficacy endpoint in clinical trials.

Dataset Information

The Efficacy and Safety of New-Generation Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-Related Dry Eye: A Multicenter, Randomized, Patients-Blind, Parallel-Control, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Efficacy and Safety of New-Generation Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-Related Dry Eye: A Multicenter, Randomized, Patients-Blind, Parallel-Control, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets