Dataset Information

A Practical Workflow for Organizing Clinical Intraoperative and Long-term iEEG Data in BIDS.

ABSTRACT: The neuroscience community increasingly uses the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) to organize data, extending from MRI to electrophysiology data. While automated tools and workflows are developed that help organize MRI data from the scanner to BIDS, these workflows are lacking for clinical intracranial EEG (iEEG data). We present a practical workflow on how to organize full clinical iEEG epilepsy data into BIDS. We present electrophysiological datasets recorded from twelve subjects who underwent intracranial monitoring followed by resective epilepsy surgery at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, and became seizure-free after surgery. These data include intraoperative electrocorticography recordings from six patients, long-term electrocorticography recordings from three patients and stereo-encephalography recordings from three patients. We describe the 6 steps in the pipeline that are essential to structure the data from these clinical iEEG recordings into BIDS and the challenges during this process. These proposed workflow enable centers performing clinical iEEG recordings to structure their data to improve accessibility, reusability and interoperability of clinical data.

SUBMITTER: Demuru M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9440951 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Practical Workflow for Organizing Clinical Intraoperative and Long-term iEEG Data in BIDS.

Demuru Matteo M van Blooijs Dorien D Zweiphenning Willemiek W Hermes Dora D Leijten Frans F Zijlmans Maeike M

Neuroinformatics 20220304 3

The neuroscience community increasingly uses the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) to organize data, extending from MRI to electrophysiology data. While automated tools and workflows are developed that help organize MRI data from the scanner to BIDS, these workflows are lacking for clinical intracranial EEG (iEEG data). We present a practical workflow on how to organize full clinical iEEG epilepsy data into BIDS. We present electrophysiological datasets recorded from twelve subjects who underw ...[more]

PMID: 35244855

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe importance of reporting research evidence to stakeholders in ways that balance complexity and usability is well-documented. However, guidance for how to accomplish this is less clear. We describe a method of developing and visualising dimension-specific scores for organisational context (context rank method). We explore perspectives of leaders in long-term care nursing homes (NHs) on two methods for reporting organisational context data: context rank method and our traditionally presented binary method-more/less favourable context.MethodsWe used a multimethod design. First, we used survey data from 4065 healthcare aides on 290 care units from 91 NHs to calculate quartiles for each of the 10 Alberta Context Tool (ACT) dimension scores, aggregated at the care unit level based on the overall sample distribution of these scores. This ordinal variable was then summed across ACT scores. Context rank scores were assessed for associations with outcomes for NH staff and for quality of care (healthcare aides' instrumental and conceptual research use, job satisfaction, rushed care, care left undone) using regression analyses. Second, we used a qualitative descriptive approach to elicit NH leaders' perspectives on whether the methods were understandable, meaningful, relevant, and useful. With 16 leaders, we conducted focus groups between December 2017 and June 2018: one in Nova Scotia, one in Prince Edward Island, and one in Ontario, Canada. Data were analysed using content analysis.ResultsComposite scores generated using the context rank method had positive associations with healthcare aides' instrumental research use (p < .0067) and conceptual research use and job satisfaction (p < .0001). Associations were negative between context rank summary scores and rushed care and care left undone (p < .0001). Overall, leaders indicated that data presented by both methods had value. They liked the binary method as a starting point but appreciated the greater level of detail in the context rank method.ConclusionsWe recommend careful selection of either the binary or context rank method based on purpose and audience. If a simple, high-level overview is the goal, the binary method has value. If improvement is the goal, the context rank method will give leaders more actionable details.

Dataset Information

A Practical Workflow for Organizing Clinical Intraoperative and Long-term iEEG Data in BIDS.

Publications

A Practical Workflow for Organizing Clinical Intraoperative and Long-term iEEG Data in BIDS.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets