Postoperative opioid consumption after spine surgery: 24 hours or midnight to midnight?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lam S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9451598 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Postoperative opioid consumption after spine surgery: 24 hours or midnight to midnight?
Lam Stephanie S Veselis Robert R Malhotra Vivek V McCormick Patrick P
Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 20210331 9
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background: The days following surgery are a critical period where the use of opioids predicts long-term outcomes in adults. It is currently unknown as to whether opioid consumption throughout the acute postoperative period is associated with long-term outcomes in pediatric patients. The aims of this study were to characterize opioid consumption trajectories in the acute postoperative period, identify predictors of trajectory membership and determine associations between opioid consumption trajectories and long-term patient outcomes. Materials and methods: Medication use, pain and mental health status were assessed at baseline in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis who were scheduled for spinal fusion surgery. Cumulative 6-hr opioid consumption was recorded for up to 5 days after spinal surgery. At 6 months after surgery, medication use, pain and functional activity were evaluated. Growth mixture modeling was used to identify opioid trajectories. Results: One hundred and six patients were included in the study. Mean cumulative 6-hr opioid consumption in the acute postoperative period was 13.23±5.20 mg/kg. The model with the best fit contained 5 acute postoperative trajectories and a quadratic term (AIC =6703.26, BIC =6767.19). Two types of patient behaviors were identified: high opioid consumers (trajectories 4 and 5) and low opioid consumers (trajectories 1, 2 and 3). Intraoperative intrathecal morphine dose was a predictor of trajectory membership (p=0.0498). Opioid consumption during the acute postoperative period was not significantly associated with pain, functional activity or pain medication use at 6 months after surgery. Conclusion: In pediatric patients, intraoperative intrathecal morphine dose predicts opioid consumption in the acute postoperative period. Importantly, opioid consumption during this period does not affect long-term outcomes in pediatric patients after a spine surgery.
| S-EPMC6536124 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe United States has been facing a worsening opioid epidemic over the past two decades. The veteran population represents a large and vulnerable group with a higher burden of mental health comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of lumbar spine surgery on postoperative opioid usage in the United States veteran population.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure database. Patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery were stratified into three groups by their preoperative opioid claims within 365 days of surgery. Postoperative cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were tracked for each group and the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare cumulative preoperative MME (days -365-0) to cumulative postoperative MME (days 91-455).ResultsAt one year, 30.6% of patients in the high preoperative opioid group and 73.1% of patients in the low preoperative opioid group were no longer using opioids. In the opioid naive cohort, 10.0% of patients were still using opioids at one year. Among all patients, median cumulative postoperative MME was significantly less than median cumulative preoperative MME (P<0.001). High preoperative opioid usage of more than 3 claims was most significantly associated with continued postoperative opioid usage (odds ratio 12.55, P<0.001). From 2010 to 2020 the proportion of patients with preoperative opioid claims decreased (58.8% to 34.8%).ConclusionsIn the veteran population, lumbar spine surgery was effective in getting 50% of patients who were on opioids preoperatively to discontinue opioids postoperatively. Even minimal exposure to opioids preoperatively resulted in a 2.69-time increase in risk of being on opioids at one year versus opioid naive patients. This study affirms that despite being a high-risk population, the veteran population has a similar response to lumbar spine surgery as the general population in regards to opioid dependence.
| S-EPMC9808105 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Backgroundin the United States from 1999 to 2000 through 2017-2018, the prevalence of obesity increased from 30.5 to 42.4%, while the prevalence of severe obesity nearly doubled. In lumbar spine surgery, obesity is associated with increased complications, worse perioperative outcomes, and higher costs. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and opioid consumption in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery. We hypothesized that obese patients would require more opioids postoperatively.Methodsretrospective review of 306 patients who underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery between 2016 and 2020. Patients were stratified by BMI as follows: normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obese I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2), and obese II-III (≥ 35.0 kg/m2). Patient demographics and preoperative characteristics were compared across BMI cohorts using one-way ANOVA and chi-square analysis. Patients with prior history of opioid use were excluded. Primary outcome measure was postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included operative time, length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, and 30-day re-encounter rates. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable linear regression adjusted for potential confounders.Resultsof 306 total patients, 17.3% were normal weight, 39.9% were overweight, 25.5% were obese I, and 17.3% were obese II-III. Obesity was associated with longer operative times and length of stay (p < 0.001, p = 0.024). For opioid naïve patients, there was no difference in-house opioid consumption when adjusted for kilograms of body mass and LOS (p = 0.083). Classes II-III patients were prescribed more than twice the number of postoperative opioids (p < 0.001) and were on opioids for a longer time postoperatively (p = 0.019).Conclusionobesity is associated with longer operative times, longer LOS, and increased consumption of postoperative opioids. This should be considered when counseling patients preoperatively prior to lumbar spine fusion procedures.
| S-EPMC8820039 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Aim: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) decreases inflammation and could augment perioperative analgesia. Materials & methods: This prospective pilot trial examined postoperative opioid consumption at 12 h following intraoperative NAC. In phase I, 20 adults scheduled for posterior spine surgery were randomized to NAC (0, 50, 100 and 150 mg/kg) to determine the optimal dose. In phase II, 30 patients were randomized to placebo or NAC (150 mg/kg). Opioid consumption, pain ratings and time to opioid rescue were recorded. Results: Postoperative opioid consumption was reduced in the NAC group 19.3% at 12 h and 20% at 18 and 36 h. Opioid consumption was reduced 22-24% in the NAC group at all times after adjusting for intraoperative opioid administration. NAC subjects reported lower pain scores relative to placebo. Conclusion: Subjects randomized to NAC consumed less postoperative opioids and reported less pain versus placebo. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate NAC for analgesia. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04562597 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
| S-EPMC10694787 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Postoperative pain management is one of the most challenging jobs in orthopedic surgical population as it comprises of patients from extremes of ages and with multiple comorbidities. Though effective, opioids may contribute to serious adverse effects particularly in old age patients. Intravenous paracetamol is widely used in the postoperative period with the hope that it may reduce opioid consumption and produce better pain relief. A brief review of human clinical trials where intravenous paracetamol was compared with placebo or no treatment in postoperative period in orthopedic surgical population has been done here. We found that four clinical trials reported that there is a significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption. When patients received an IV injection of 2 g propacetamol, reduction of morphine consumption up to 46% has been reported. However, one study did not find any reduction of opioid requirement after spinal surgery in children and adolescent. Four clinical trials reported better pain scores when paracetamol has been used, but other three trials denied. We conclude that postoperative intravenous paracetamol is a safe and effective adjunct to opioid after orthopedic surgery, but at present there is no data to decide whether paracetamol reduces opioid related adverse effects or not.
| S-EPMC3836381 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10873399 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the effect of prescription opioid use in the year before surgery on opioid consumption after surgery.BackgroundRecently developed postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines rely on data from opioid-naïve patients. However, opioid use in the USA is common, and the impact of prior opioid exposure on the consumption of opioids after surgery is unclear.MethodsPopulation-based cohort study of 26,001 adults 18 years of age and older who underwent one of nine elective general or gynecologic surgical procedures between January 1, 2017 and October 31, 2019, with prospectively collected patient-reported data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) linked to state prescription drug monitoring program at 70 MSQC-participating hospitals on 30-day patient-reported opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME) (primary outcome).ResultsCompared with opioid-naïve participants, opioid-exposed participants (26% of sample) consumed more prescription opioids after surgery (adjusted OME difference 12, 95% CI 10 to 14). Greater opioid exposure was associated with higher postoperative consumption in a dose-dependent manner, with chronic users reporting the greatest consumption (additional OMEs 32, 95% CI 21 to 42). However, for eight of nine procedures, 90% of opioid-exposed participants consumed ≤150 OMEs. Among those receiving perioperative prescriptions, opioid-exposed participants had higher likelihood of refill (adjusted OR 4.7, 95% CI 4.4 to 5.1), number of refills (adjusted incidence rate ratio 4.0, 95% CI 3.7 to 4.3), and average refill amount (adjusted OME difference 333, 95% CI 292 to 374)).ConclusionsPreoperative opioid use is associated with small increases in patient-reported opioid consumption after surgery for most patients, though greater differences exist for patients with chronic use. For most patients with preoperative opioid exposure, existing guidelines may meet their postoperative needs. However, guidelines may need tailoring for patients with chronic use, and providers should anticipate a higher likelihood of postoperative refills for all opioid-exposed patients.
| S-EPMC9035103 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The American opioid epidemic has led to one of the worse public health crises in recent history, and emerging evidence has highlighted the role of healthcare professionals in exposing patients and communities to potent opioid drugs. Surgeons, in treating postoperative pain, are at the forefront of this epidemic. In Urology, investigators are beginning to establish how patients handle and consume opioids following common urologic procedures in an effort to limit excess prescribing. However, there is a paucity of data to define acceptable amounts of opioid medications to adequately treat postoperative pain after urologic surgery. Many common urologic procedures are now routinely performed with robotic technology. Robotic, minimally-invasive approaches decrease incision size and accelerate postoperative recovery, thereby presenting a unique opportunity to curb excessive opioid prescribing in the postoperative patient. Herein, we explore the roots of the current crisis, outline current literature guiding pain control after surgery, and review the current, though sparse, literature that may guide urologists in decreasing opioid use after robotic surgery.
| S-EPMC8185686 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceProlonged prescribing of opioids after spine surgery is often perceived as a negative outcome, but successful opioid reduction may occur despite continued prescribing. Improved characterization of opioid availability before and after surgery is necessary to identify these successes.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between spine surgery and modification of opioid availability postoperatively by using consistent definitions to classify opioid availability before and after surgery.Design, setting, and participantsThis population-based cohort study included 2223 adults (age ≥18 years) who underwent spine surgery in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2019, to December 1, 2019.ExposuresPreoperative opioid availability based on prescription data in the 180 days before surgery in accordance with Consortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends (CONSORT) definitions.Main outcomes and measuresSuccessful modification of opioid availability, defined as an improvement in CONSORT status postoperatively (assessed from 181 to 365 days after surgery) compared with preoperative status, or continued absence of opioid availability for patients with no preoperative availability. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between preoperative opioid availability and successful modification by 1 year after undergoing surgery.ResultsOf 2223 patients included in the study, 1214 were male (54.6%), with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range, 43-68) years. Patients were classified as having no (778 [35.0%]), short-term (1118 [50.3%]), episodic (227 [10.2%]), or long-term (100 [4.5%]) preoperative opioid availability. Of the 2148 patients (96.6%) who were alive at 1 year, postoperative opioid availability was classified as no (1583 [73.7%]), short-term (398 [18.5%]), episodic (104 [4.8%]), and long-term (63 [2.9%]). A total of 1672 patients (77.8%) had successful modification of opioid availability, with success of 83.0% for those with no preoperative availability, 74.9% for those with short-term preoperative availability, 79.8% for those with episodic preoperative availability, and 64.4% for those with long-term preoperative opioid availability. In multivariable analysis, success was significantly associated with preoperative opioid availability (odds ratio [OR] for short term, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48-0.77]; OR for episodic, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.64-1.40]; OR long term, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.30-0.82]; P < .001 overall vs no availability).Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, when following standardized CONSORT definitions, 4 of 5 adults undergoing spine surgery in a population-based cohort met the criteria for a successful pattern of postoperative opioid prescribing. Similar methods to objectively assess changes in opioid prescribing may be clinically useful in other perioperative settings.
| S-EPMC7317600 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10082423 | biostudies-literature