Dataset Information

Long-term survival of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in patients under 70.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

As definitive data from randomized controlled trials comparing the effect on long-term survival of using single internal mammary artery (SIMA) or bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting are not yet available, observational studies allow for long-term follow-up in large and representative populations, which might complement the information potentially derived from randomized trials. To compare long-term survival in patients under 70 years of age undergoing SIMA or BIMA grafting.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 3384 consecutive patients under 70 years undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, performed from 2000 to 2015, in a Portuguese level III Hospital. We identified 2176 and 1208 patients from the study population who underwent SIMA and BIMA grafting, respectively. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 10 years. We employed inverse probability weighting to restrict confounding by indication.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 59.4 (± 7.6) years, and 567 (16.8%) were females. Inverse probability weighting was effective in eliminating differences in all significant baseline characteristics. Follow-up was 99.88% complete. The median follow-up time was 12.82 (interquartile range, 9.65, 16.74) years: the primary end point of all-cause mortality at 10 years occurred in 463 patients (21.3%) and 166 (13.7%) in the SIMA and BIMA grafting groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.92; P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Bilateral internal mammary grafting is associated with lower long-term mortality than single internal mammary grafting. Moreover, this survival benefit comes at no increased perioperative morbidity or mortality cost.

SUBMITTER: Abreu A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9462425 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Long-term survival of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in patients under 70.

Abreu Armando A Máximo José J Leite-Moreira Adelino A

Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 20220901 4

<h4>Objectives</h4>As definitive data from randomized controlled trials comparing the effect on long-term survival of using single internal mammary artery (SIMA) or bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting are not yet available, observational studies allow for long-term follow-up in large and representative populations, which might complement the information potentially derived from randomized trials. To compare long-term survival in patients under 70 years of age undergoing SIMA or BIM ...[more]

PMID: 36005896

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Several risk scores have been created to predict long term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Several studies demonstrated a reduction in long-term mortality following bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) compared to single internal thoracic artery. However, these prediction models usually referred to long term survival as survival of up to 5 years. Moreover, none of these models were built specifically for operation incorporating BITA grafting. METHODS:A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent isolated BITA grafting between 1996 and 2011 at Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center, a tertiary referral university affiliated medical center with a 24-bed cardio-thoracic surgery department. Study population (N = 2,935) was randomly divided into 2 groups: learning group which was used to build the prediction model and validation group. Cox regression was used to predict death using pre-procedural risk factors (demographic data, patient comorbidities, cardiac characteristics and patient's status). The accuracy (discrimination and calibration) of the prediction model was evaluated. METHODS AND FINDINGS:The learning (1,468 patients) and validation (1,467 patients) groups had similar preoperative characteristics and similar survival. Older age, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure, old MI, ejection fraction ≤30%, pre-operative use of intra-aortic balloon, and peripheral vascular disease, were significant predictors of mortality and were used to build the prediction model. The area under the ROC curves for 5, 10, and 15-year survival ranged between 0.742 and 0.762 for the learning group and between 0.766 and 0.770 for the validation group. The prediction model showed good calibration performance in both groups. A nomogram was built in order to introduce a simple-to-use tool for prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year survival. CONCLUSIONS:A simple-to-use validated model can be used for a prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year mortality after CABG using the BITA grafting technique.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral of the most extensively used risk prediction tools for coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes include female sex as an independent risk factor for postoperative outcomes. It is not clear whether this putative increased surgical risk impacts long-term survival. This study aimed to assess sex differences in 10-year all-cause mortality.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 5340 consecutive patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery, performed from 2000 to 2015, in a Portuguese level III Hospital. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at ten years. We employed an overlap weighting algorithm to minimize confounding. Its target population highlights patients with the most overlap in their observed characteristics, and its corresponding estimand is the average treatment effect in the overlap population.ResultsWe identified that 5340 patients underwent isolated CABG: 1104 (20.7%) were female, and 4236 (79.3%) were male. Sixteen patients were lost to follow-up (0.3%). The median follow-up time was 12.79 (IQR, 9.52-16.66) years: 12.68 (IQR, 9.48-16.54) years for the male patient group and 13.13 (IQR, 9.75-16.98) years for the female patient group. The primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at ten years occurred in 1106 patients (26.1%) in the male patient group, compared with 315 (28.5%) in the female patient group. The unweighted survival analysis for both groups reveals the worst long-term prognosis for the female cohort (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.35; p < 0.001), while in the overlap weighted survival analysis, such long-term difference in prognosis disappears (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09; p = 0.693).ConclusionIn this longitudinal, population-level analysis of patients undergoing primary, isolated CABG, we demonstrated that the female sex is not associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality compared to their male counterparts. Thus, sex should not influence the undertaking of an adequate revascularization strategy.

Project description:BackgroundBilateral internal thoracic artery Y-composite grafting with sequential anastomoses is a well-established strategy for multi-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting. This study investigated the factors affecting long-term patency of bilateral internal thoracic artery Y-composite grafts and their influence on survival.MethodsPatients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal thoracic artery Y-composite grafts due to triple-vessel disease were included. In total, 415 cases (2003-2020) with at least 1 postoperative coronary computed tomography or angiography examination were enrolled. Through a retrospective review of medical records and computed tomography, risk factors for graft events (string sign or occlusion) were analysed, and the influence of string sign or occlusion in the initial postoperative computed tomography on long-term survival was evaluated.ResultsPatients' mean age was 66±9 years and 324 were male (78%). The mean number of anastomoses from bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts was 4.0±0.9. The mean follow-up duration was 8.0±4.0 years (interquartile range: 4.8-11.5 years). Beating-heart surgery negatively affected the patency of grafts to the left circumflex and right coronary artery territories (P=0.015 and P=0.030, respectively), but in the left anterior descending territory, the graft patency did not differ (P=0.053). Non-severe (<90%) native-vessel stenosis was a risk factor for poor patency in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery territories (P<0.001 for all). Twenty-four of the 104 nonvisible or narrowed grafts (23%) on early imaging later became widely patent. Occlusion of the grafts or the string sign within postoperative 1 year did not have a negative impact on long-term survival (P=0.421).ConclusionsThe patency rate was suboptimal in case of non-severe target-vessel stenosis (<90%). The beating-heart technique may negatively influence the patency of anastomoses to the left circumflex and right coronary artery territories. Compromised graft patency observed on initial computed tomography did not lead to worse survival.

Dataset Information

Long-term survival of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in patients under 70.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Long-term survival of single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in patients under 70.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets