Dataset Information

Integrative and comparative single-cell analysis reveals transcriptomic difference between human tumefactive demyelinating lesion and glioma.

ABSTRACT: Tumefactive demyelinating lesion (TDL) is an immune-mediated disease which can be misdiagnosed as glioma. At present, there is no study comparing difference between the two disorders at the cellular level. Here, we perform integrative and comparative single-cell RNA sequencing (ScRNA-seq) transcriptomic analysis on TDL and glioma lesions. At single-cell resolution, TDL is comprised primarily of immune cells, which is completely different from glioma. The integrated analysis reveals a TDL-specific microglial subset involving in B cell activation and proliferation. Comparative analysis highlights remyelination function of glial cells and demyelination function of T cells in TDL. Subclustering and pseudotime trajectory analysis of T cells in TDL reveal their heterogeneity and diverse functions involving in TDL pathogenesis and recovery process. Our study identifies substantial differences between TDL and glioma at single-cell resolution. The observed heterogeneity and potentially diverse functions of cells in TDL may be critical in disease progression.

SUBMITTER: Chen XY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9463163 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Integrative and comparative single-cell analysis reveals transcriptomic difference between human tumefactive demyelinating lesion and glioma.

Chen Xiao-Yong XY Chen Yue Y Fang Wen-Hua WH Wu Zan-Yi ZY Wang Deng-Liang DL Xu Ya-Wen YW Yu Liang-Hong LH Lin Yuan-Xiang YX Kang De-Zhi DZ Ding Chen-Yu CY

Communications biology 20220909 1

Tumefactive demyelinating lesion (TDL) is an immune-mediated disease which can be misdiagnosed as glioma. At present, there is no study comparing difference between the two disorders at the cellular level. Here, we perform integrative and comparative single-cell RNA sequencing (ScRNA-seq) transcriptomic analysis on TDL and glioma lesions. At single-cell resolution, TDL is comprised primarily of immune cells, which is completely different from glioma. The integrated analysis reveals a TDL-specifi ...[more]

PMID: 36085357

Similar Datasets

Project description:Tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDL), characterized by large (≥ 2 cm) demyelinating lesions mimicking tumors, are a rare manifestation of the central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases (CNS-IDD). Distinguishing TDL from other brain lesions can be challenging, often necessitating biopsy or advanced diagnostics. The natural history of TDL varies among races. This study aimed to assess demographics, clinical and radiological features, laboratory findings, management, and outcomes of Thai patients with TDL. We retrospectively reviewed records of twenty-six patients with TDL from the Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders registry from two tertiary medical centers. Among 1102 CNS-IDD patients, 26 (2.4%) had TDL. The median age at TDLs onset was 34.5 years (range 17-75); 69.2% were female. Over 70% manifested TDL as their initial CNS-IDD presentation. Common presenting symptoms included motor deficits, sensory disturbances, and cognitive problems. About two-fifths exhibited multiple lesions, most frequently in the frontoparietal region (46.2%). Half of the patients showed an incomplete ring on post-contrast T1-weighted imaging, with peripheral diffusion-weighted imaging restriction in twenty-one patients. T2-hypointense rims were present in thirteen (56.5%) patients. Brain biopsy was performed in 12 cases (46.1%). Serum aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin was positive in 16.7% of tested (4/24) cases. Serum myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin was negative in all thirteen patients tested. Twenty patients (76.9%) received intravenous corticosteroids for TDL attacks. After the median follow-up period of 48 months (range 6-300), 23.1% experienced CNS-IDD relapses. Median Expanded Disability Status Scale at TDL diagnosis was 4.3 (range 0.0-9.5), and improved to 3.0 (range 0.0-10.0) at the last follow-up. This study suggested that TDL were rare among Thai CNS-IDD patients, frequently presenting as a monophasic condition with a favorable outcome.

Project description:Tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDL) represent a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians, and in rare atypical cases a collaboration of a neuroradiologist, a neurologist, and a neuropathologist is warranted for accurate diagnosis. Recent advances in neuropathology have shown that TDL represent an umbrella under which many different diagnostic entities can be responsible. TDL can emerge not only as part of the spectrum of classic multiple sclerosis (MS) but also can represent an idiopathic monophasic disease, a relapsing disease with recurrent TDL, or could be part of the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)- and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-associated disease. TDL can appear during the MS disease course, and increasingly cases arise showing an association with specific drug interventions. Although TDL share common features with classic MS lesions, they display some unique features, such as extensive and widespread demyelination, massive and intense parenchymal infiltration by macrophages along with lymphocytes (mainly T but also B cells), dystrophic changes in astrocytes, and the presence of Creutzfeldt cells. This article reviews the existent literature regarding the neuropathological findings of tumefactive demyelination in various disease processes to better facilitate the identification of disease signatures. Recent developments in immunopathology of central nervous system disease suggest that specific pathological immune features (type of demyelination, infiltrating cell type distribution, specific astrocyte pathology and complement deposition) can differentiate tumefactive lesions arising as part of MS, MOG-associated disease, and AQP4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Lessons from immunopathology will help us not only stratify these lesions in disease entities but also to better organize treatment strategies. Improved advances in tissue biomarkers should pave the way for prompt and accurate diagnosis of TDL leading to better outcomes for patients.

Project description:BackgroundAccurate diagnosis of tumefactive demyelinating lesions is clinically important to avoid unnecessary invasive biopsy or inappropriate treatment.PurposeWe aimed to evaluate conventional and advanced MR imaging findings of tumefactive demyelinating lesions and determine the diagnostic performance of MR imaging for differentiating tumefactive demyelinating lesions from primary brain tumor.Data sourcesA systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE up to December 6, 2017, was conducted.Study selectionOriginal articles describing MR imaging findings in patients with tumefactive demyelinating lesions were selected.Data analysisThe pooled incidences of conventional MR imaging findings of tumefactive demyelinating lesions were obtained with the DerSimonian and Liard random-effects model. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging for differentiating tumefactive demyelinating lesions from primary brain tumor were obtained using the bivariate random-effects model.Data synthesisNineteen eligible studies with 476 patients with tumefactive demyelinating lesions were included. The pooled incidence of open ring or incomplete rim enhancement was 35% (95% CI, 24%-47%), which was significantly higher than the incidence of closed ring or complete rim enhancement (18% [95% CI, 11%-29%]; P = .0281). The pooled incidences of T2 hypointense rim, absent or mild mass effect, and absent or mild perilesional edema were 48%, 67%, and 57%, respectively. On advanced MR imaging, tumefactive demyelinating lesions showed a high apparent diffusion coefficient, peripheral restricted diffusion, and low cerebral blood volume. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging for differentiating tumefactive demyelinating lesions from primary brain tumor were 89% (95% CI, 82%-93%) and 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%), respectively.LimitationsSeventeen of 19 studies were retrospective studies.ConclusionsConventional MR imaging findings may help differentiate tumefactive demyelinating lesions from primary brain tumor, though further study is needed to determine the added value of advanced MR imaging.

Project description:Objective To track the clinical outcomes in patients who initially presented with tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs), we summarized the clinical characteristics of various etiologies, and identified possible relapse risk factors for TDLs. Methods Between 2001 and 2021, 116 patients initially presented with TDLs in our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were followed for relapse and clinical outcomes, and grouped according to various etiologies. Demographic information, clinical data, imaging data, and laboratory results of patients were obtained and analyzed. The risk factors of relapse were analyzed by the Log-Rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model in multivariate analysis. Result During a median follow-up period of 72 months, 33 patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS), 6 patients with Balo, 6 patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), 10 patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated demyelination (MOGAD), 1 patient with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and the remaining 60 patients still have no clear etiology. These individuals with an unknown etiology were categorized independently and placed to the other etiology group. In the other etiology group, 13 patients had recurrent demyelinating phases, while 47 patients did not suffer any more clinical events. Approximately 46.6% of TDLs had relapses which were associated with multiple functional system involvement, first-phase Expanded Disability Status Scale score, lesions morphology, number of lesions, and lesions location (P<0.05). And diffuse infiltrative lesions (P=0.003, HR=6.045, 95%CI:1.860-19.652), multiple lesions (P=0.001, HR=3.262, 95%CI:1.654-6.435) and infratentorial involvement (P=0.006, HR=2.289, 95%CI:1.064-3.853) may be independent risk factors for recurrence. Relapse free survival was assessed to be 36 months. Conclusions In clinical practice, around 46.6% of TDLs relapsed, with the MS group showing the highest recurrence rate, and lesions location, diffuse infiltrative lesions, and multiple lesions might be independent risk factors for relapse. Nevertheless, despite extensive diagnostic work and long-term follow-up, the etiology of TDLs in some patients was still unclear. And these patients tend to have monophase course and a low rate of relapse.

Dataset Information

Integrative and comparative single-cell analysis reveals transcriptomic difference between human tumefactive demyelinating lesion and glioma.

Publications

Integrative and comparative single-cell analysis reveals transcriptomic difference between human tumefactive demyelinating lesion and glioma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets