Knowledge translation concerns for the CONSORT-PRO extension reporting guidance: a review of reviews.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: This review of reviews aimed to appraise the use of the CONSORT-PRO Extension as an evaluation tool for assessing the reporting of patient-reported outcome (PROs) in publications, and to describe the reporting of PRO research across reviews. We also outlined how variation in such evaluations impacts knowledge translation and may lead to potential misuse of the CONSORT-PRO Extension. We systematically searched Medline, Pubmed and CINAHL from 2013 to 2025 March 2021 for reviews of the completeness of reporting of PRO endpoints according to CONSORT-PRO criteria. Two reviewers extracted details of each review, the percentage of included studies that addressed each CONSORT-PRO item, and key recommendations from each review. Fourteen reviews met inclusion criteria, and only six of these used the
SUBMITTER: Mercieca-Bebber R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9470606 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA