Dataset Information

Benefit of endoscopic stenting for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

ABSTRACT: Background and study aims Dominant strictures (DS) occur in up to 60 % of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Data regarding the long-term effects of stenting vs. dilation remain limited. The aim of this study was to compare the two treatment modalities in terms of transplantation-free survival. Patients and methods This single-center, retrospective study examined patients with PSC and DS treated endoscopically with a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Patients were divided into two cohorts: 1) those who received dilation alone; and 2) those who received both dilation and stenting. The primary outcome was transplantation-free survival, defined as time after index ERCP to liver transplantation. Results In all, 169 patients (54 in dilation cohort, 115 in stenting cohort) were included. The stenting cohort had a significantly higher Mayo PSC Risk Score (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.2) and presented with cholangitis more frequently (22.6 % vs. 1.9 %). During a follow-up period of 1198 person-years, 69 (40.8 %) patients received transplantation at a mean of 3.4 (± 2.9) years. There was no difference in transplantation rate in the stenting cohort [68 (95 % CI 5.2-8.8) per 100 person-years] compared to the dilation cohort [3.7 (95 % CI 2.1-6.0) per 100 person-years] and no difference in risk for transplantation (dilation cohort adjusted hazards ratio 0.67, 95 % CI 0.33-1.32). Conclusions Despite a higher Mayo Risk Score in the stenting group, there was no difference in transplantation-free survival between patients managed with stenting vs. dilation alone. Stenting, therefore, may offer benefit in patients with advanced PSC and DS.

SUBMITTER: Han S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9473835 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Benefit of endoscopic stenting for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Han Samuel S Shah Raj J RJ

Endoscopy international open 20220914 9

<b>Background and study aims</b> Dominant strictures (DS) occur in up to 60 % of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Data regarding the long-term effects of stenting vs. dilation remain limited. The aim of this study was to compare the two treatment modalities in terms of transplantation-free survival. <b>Patients and methods</b> This single-center, retrospective study examined patients with PSC and DS treated endoscopically with a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Patients were div ...[more]

PMID: 36118630

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesPSC strictures are routinely diagnosed on T2-MRCP as dominant- (DS) or high-grade stricture (HGS). However, high inter-observer variability limits their utility. We introduce the "potential functional stricture" (PFS) on T1-weighted hepatobiliary-phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR cholangiography (T1-MRC) to assess inter-reader agreement on diagnosis, location, and prognostic value of PFS on T1-MRC vs. DS or HGS on T2-MRCP in PSC patients, using ERCP as the gold standard.MethodsSix blinded readers independently reviewed 129 MRIs to diagnose and locate stricture, if present. DS/HGS was determined on T2-MRCP. On T1-MRC, PFS was diagnosed if no GA excretion was seen in the CBD, hilum or distal RHD, or LHD. If excretion was normal, "no functional stricture" (NFS) was diagnosed. T1-MRC diagnoses (NFS = 87; PFS = 42) were correlated with ERCP, clinical scores, labs, splenic volume, and clinical events. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression.ResultsInterobserver agreement was almost perfect for NFS vs. PFS diagnosis, but fair to moderate for DS and HGS. Forty-four ERCPs in 129 patients (34.1%) were performed, 39 in PFS (92.9%), and, due to clinical suspicion, five in NFS (5.7%) patients. PFS and NFS diagnoses had 100% PPV and 100% NPV, respectively. Labs and clinical scores were significantly worse for PFS vs. NFS. PFS patients underwent more diagnostic and therapeutic ERCPs, experienced more clinical events, and reached significantly more endpoints (p < 0.001) than those with NFS. Multivariate analysis identified PFS as an independent risk factor for liver-related events.ConclusionT1-MRC was superior to T2-MRCP for stricture diagnosis, stricture location, and prognostication.Clinical relevance statementBecause half of PSC patients will develop clinically-relevant strictures over the course of the disease, earlier more confident diagnosis and correct localization of functional stricture on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may optimize management and improve prognostication.Key points• There is no consensus regarding biliary stricture imaging features in PSC that have clinical relevance. • Twenty-minute T1-weighted MRC images correctly classified PSC patients with potential (PFS) vs with no functional stricture (NFS). • T1-MRC diagnoses may reduce the burden of diagnostic ERCPs.

Dataset Information

Benefit of endoscopic stenting for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Publications

Benefit of endoscopic stenting for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets