Dataset Information

Induction immune-checkpoint inhibitors for resectable oncogene-mutant NSCLC: A multicenter pooled analysis.

ABSTRACT: Despite limited efficacy of immunotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations, whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be clinically valuable in those patients warrants further investigation. We utilized 40 oncogene-mutant NSCLC treated with induction immunotherapy from a large consecutive multicenter cohort. Overall response rate was 62.5% while 2 patients had disease progression. Of 39 patients that received surgery, R0 resection rate was 97.4%. The major pathological response (MPR) rate was 37.5% and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 12.5%. Pre-treatment PD-L1 expression was not a predictive biomarker in these patients. Median disease-free survival for all oncogenic mutation and EGFR mutation was 28.5 months. Indirect comparison through integrating CTONG1103 cohort showed neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy yielded the most superior efficacy among erlotinib and chemotherapy for resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. No MPR patients were identified with neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for uncommon EGFR insertion or point mutations. Our results indicated the potential clinical feasibility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable localized oncogene-mutant NSCLC especially for EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

SUBMITTER: Zhang C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9485257 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Induction immune-checkpoint inhibitors for resectable oncogene-mutant NSCLC: A multicenter pooled analysis.

Zhang Chao C Chen Hua-Fei HF Yan Shi S Wu Lin L Yan Li-Xu LX Yan Xiao-Long XL Yue Dong-Sheng DS Xu Chun-Wei CW Zheng Min M Li Ji-Sheng JS Liu Si-Yang SY Yang Ling-Ling LL Jiang Ben-Yuan BY Ou Qiu-Xiang QX Qiu Zhen-Bin ZB Shao Yang Y Wu Yi-Long YL Zhong Wen-Zhao WZ

NPJ precision oncology 20220919 1

Despite limited efficacy of immunotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver mutations, whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be clinically valuable in those patients warrants further investigation. We utilized 40 oncogene-mutant NSCLC treated with induction immunotherapy from a large consecutive multicenter cohort. Overall response rate was 62.5% while 2 patients had disease progression. Of 39 patients that received surgery, R0 resection rate was 97.4%. The major path ...[more]

PMID: 36123526

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDespite the clear potential benefits of neoadjuvant therapy, the optimal neoadjuvant regimen for patients with high-risk resectable melanoma (HRRM) is not known.ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of dual checkpoint inhibitors with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD1) therapy in a neoadjuvant setting among patients with HRRM.Design, setting, and participantsIn this pooled analysis of clinical trials, studies were selected provided they investigated immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, were published between January 2018 and March 2023, and were phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials. Participant data included in the analysis were derived from trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 monotherapy and the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 with anti-PD1 in the neoadjuvant setting, specifically among patients with HRRM.InterventionsPatients were treated with either anti-PD1 monotherapy; dual checkpoint inhibition (DCPI) with a conventional dose of 3-mg/kg ipilimumab and 1-mg/kg nivolumab; or DCPI with an alternative-dose regimen of 1-mg/kg ipilimumab and 3-mg/kg nivolumab.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcomes were radiologic complete response (rCR), radiologic overall objective response (rOOR), and radiologic progressive disease. Also, pathologic complete response (pCR), the proportion of patients undergoing surgical resection, and occurrence of grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were considered.ResultsAmong 573 patients enrolled in 6 clinical trials, neoadjuvant therapy with DCPI was associated with higher odds of achieving pCR compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.16; P < .001). DCPI was associated with higher odds of grade 3 or 4 irAEs compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy (OR, 3.75; P < .001). When comparing the alternative-dose ipilimumab and nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) regimen with conventional-dose IPI-NIVO, no statistically significant difference in rCR, rOOR, radiologic progressive disease, or pCR was noted. However, the conventional-dose IPI-NIVO regimen was associated with increased grade 3 or 4 irAEs (OR, 4.76; P < .001). Conventional-dose IPI-NIVO was associated with greater odds of achieving improved rOOR (OR, 1.95; P = .046) and pCR (OR, 2.99; P < .001) compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy. The alternative dose of IPI-NIVO also was associated with higher odds of achieving rCR (OR, 2.55; P = .03) and pCR (OR, 3.87; P < .001) compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy. The risk for grade 3 or 4 irAEs is higher with both the conventional-dose (OR, 9.59; P < .001) and alternative-dose IPI-NIVO regimens (OR, 2.02; P = .02) compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy.Conclusion and relevanceIn this pooled analysis of 6 clinical trials, although DCPI was associated with increased likelihood of achieving pathological and radiologic responses, the associated risk for grade 3 or 4 irAEs was significantly lower with anti-PD1 monotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HRRM. Additionally, compared with alternative-dose IPI-NIVO, the conventional dose of IPI-NIVO was associated with increased risk for grade 3 or 4 irAEs, with no significant distinctions in radiologic or pathologic efficacy.

Project description:Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are common in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in Asian populations. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a first-line treatment in patients with mutant EGFR, but their use is often accompanied by drug resistance, which leads to disease progression. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy are the main treatment options after progression. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their combination therapy in patients with EGFR-TKI resistant is not clear. It is thus necessary to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs and ICI-based combination therapies in patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICI therapy alone or in combination versus other therapies using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and several international conference databases, from database inception to 10 March 2022. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Odds ratio (OR), risk ratio (RR), and 95% CI were used as effect indicators for objective response rate (ORR) and safety data. Results: Seven eligible RCTs were included in the present meta-analysis. The results showed that neither ICIs nor combination therapy prolonged median OS in EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC patients (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.84-1.29, p = 0.73). However, compared with the control group, the patients treated with ICI-based combination therapy had better PFS (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45-0.86, p = 0.004) and ORR (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.28-2.66, p = 0.001). Conclusion: ICI monotherapy did not improve the OS or PFS of NSCLC patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs, whereas patients treated with ICI-based combination therapy had better PFS compared with those receiving conventional chemotherapy, indicating that this therapy could be offered to patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after progression following TKI treatment. There was no significant difference in all-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between the combination therapy group and the control group. However, a higher incidence of discontinuation due to TRAEs was observed; this requires attention in future studies. The results of this meta-analysis provide a reference for clinical practice and future trial design. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021282207.

Dataset Information

Induction immune-checkpoint inhibitors for resectable oncogene-mutant NSCLC: A multicenter pooled analysis.

Publications

Induction immune-checkpoint inhibitors for resectable oncogene-mutant NSCLC: A multicenter pooled analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets