Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Mandarin Chinese wh-in-situ argument-adjunct asymmetry in island sensitivity: Evidence from a formal judgment study.


ABSTRACT: Unlike adjunct wh's-in-situ, argument wh's-in-situ do not seem to be subject to island constraints in Chinese and other East Asian languages. This difference in island sensitivity between argument and adjunct wh's-in-situ is known as argument-adjunct asymmetry in the theoretical literature. Recently, this long-established asymmetry is challenged by a formal judgment study. It was claimed in the study that this asymmetry is an illusion and both argument and adjunct wh's-in-situ are subject to island constraints. The present study demonstrates that such a claim is not convincing because it is based on problematic experimental design. We designed two experiments to test the island effects on Chinese wh's-in-situ. The results reaffirm that the argument-adjunct asymmetry in Chinese wh's-in-situ is indeed present, contrary to the findings of previous formal judgment study, and they also corroborate our assumption that when object wh's-in-situ like shénme 'what' are located inside a relative clause, they are subject to a pragmatic constraint, suggesting that the VP (formed by a verb and its wh-object) in the relative clause tends to describe the prominent/salient feature of the relativized nominal head.

SUBMITTER: Tian Q 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9505917 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Mandarin Chinese <i>wh</i>-in-situ argument-adjunct asymmetry in island sensitivity: Evidence from a formal judgment study.

Tian Qilin Q   Park Myung-Kwan MK   Yang Xiaodong X  

Frontiers in psychology 20220909


Unlike adjunct <i>wh's</i>-in-situ, argument <i>wh's</i>-in-situ do not seem to be subject to island constraints in Chinese and other East Asian languages. This difference in island sensitivity between argument and adjunct <i>wh's</i>-in-situ is known as argument-adjunct asymmetry in the theoretical literature. Recently, this long-established asymmetry is challenged by a formal judgment study. It was claimed in the study that this asymmetry is an illusion and both argument and adjunct <i>wh's</i  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7399089 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7892779 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11372106 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4731687 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10194922 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6130316 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4709560 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10990860 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9382998 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3210184 | biostudies-other