Dataset Information

Radiation Dose Reduction in Digital Mammography by Deep-Learning Algorithm Image Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study 딥러닝 알고리즘을 이용한 저선량 디지털 유방 촬영 영상의 복원: 예비 연구

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To develop a denoising convolutional neural network-based image processing technique and investigate its efficacy in diagnosing breast cancer using low-dose mammography imaging.

Materials and Methods

A total of 6 breast radiologists were included in this prospective study. All radiologists independently evaluated low-dose images for lesion detection and rated them for diagnostic quality using a qualitative scale. After application of the denoising network, the same radiologists evaluated lesion detectability and image quality. For clinical application, a consensus on lesion type and localization on preoperative mammographic examinations of breast cancer patients was reached after discussion. Thereafter, coded low-dose, reconstructed full-dose, and full-dose images were presented and assessed in a random order.

Results

Lesions on 40% reconstructed full-dose images were better perceived when compared with low-dose images of mastectomy specimens as a reference. In clinical application, as compared to 40% reconstructed images, higher values were given on full-dose images for resolution (p < 0.001); diagnostic quality for calcifications (p < 0.001); and for masses, asymmetry, or architectural distortion (p = 0.037). The 40% reconstructed images showed comparable values to 100% full-dose images for overall quality (p = 0.547), lesion visibility (p = 0.120), and contrast (p = 0.083), without significant differences.

Conclusion

Effective denoising and image reconstruction processing techniques can enable breast cancer diagnosis with substantial radiation dose reduction.

SUBMITTER:

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9514435 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesDeep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) offers unique opportunities for reducing image noise without degrading image quality or diagnostic accuracy in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). The present study aimed at exploiting the capabilities of DLIR to reduce radiation dose and assess its impact on stenosis severity, plaque composition analysis, and plaque volume quantification.MethodsThis prospective study includes 50 patients who underwent two sequential CCTA scans at normal-dose (ND) and lower-dose (LD). ND scans were reconstructed with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) 100%, and LD scans with DLIR. Image noise (in Hounsfield units, HU) and quantitative plaque volumes (in mm3) were assessed quantitatively. Stenosis severity was visually categorized into no stenosis (0%), stenosis (< 20%, 20-50%, 51-70%, 71-90%, 91-99%), and occlusion (100%). Plaque composition was classified as calcified, non-calcified, or mixed.ResultsReduction of radiation dose from ND scans with ASiR-V 100% to LD scans with DLIR at the highest level (DLIR-H; 1.4 mSv vs. 0.8 mSv, p < 0.001) had no impact on image noise (28 vs. 27 HU, p = 0.598). Reliability of stenosis severity and plaque composition was excellent between ND scans with ASiR-V 100% and LD scans with DLIR-H (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.995 and 0.974, respectively). Comparison of plaque volumes using Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of - 0.8 mm3 (± 2.5 mm3) and limits of agreement between - 5.8 and + 4.1 mm3.ConclusionDLIR enables a reduction in radiation dose from CCTA by 43% without significant impact on image noise, stenosis severity, plaque composition, and quantitative plaque volume.Key points•Deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) enables radiation dose reduction by over 40% for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). •Image noise remains unchanged between a normal-dose CCTA reconstructed by ASiR-V and a lower-dose CCTA reconstructed by DLIR. •There is no impact on the assessment of stenosis severity, plaque composition, and quantitative plaque volume between the two scans.

Project description:PURPOSE:To evaluate the image quality of low-dose chest digital radiographic images obtained with a new spatial noise reduction algorithm, compared to a conventional de-noising technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In 69 patients, the dose reduction protocol was divided into A, B, and C test groups- 60% (n = 22), 50% (n = 23), and 40% (n = 24) of the baseline dose. In each patient, baseline dose radiographs were obtained with conventional image processing while low-dose images were acquired with new image processing. A set of baseline and low-dose radiographic images per patient was evaluated and scored on a 5-point scale over seven anatomical landmarks (radiolucency of unobscured lung, pulmonary vascularity, trachea, edge of rib, heart border, intervertebral disc space, and pulmonary vessels in the retrocardiac area) and three representative abnormal findings (nodule, consolidation, and interstitial marking) by two thoracic radiologists. A comparison of paired baseline and low-dose images was statistically analyzed using a non-inferiority test based on the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS:In A, B, and C test groups, the mean dose reduction rate of the baseline radiation dose was 63.4%, 53.9%, and 47.8%, respectively. In all test groups, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was less than the non-inferiority margin of 0.5 every seven anatomical landmarks and three representative abnormal findings, which suggested that the image quality of the low-dose image was not inferior to that of the baseline dose image even if the maximum average dose reduction rate was reduced to 47.8% of the baseline dose. CONCLUSION:In our study, an image processing technique integrating a new noise reduction algorithm achieved dose reductions of approximately half without compromising image quality for abnormal lung findings and anatomical landmarks seen on chest radiographs. This feature-preserving, noise reduction algorithm adopted in the proposed engine enables a lower radiation dose boundary for the sake of patient's and radiography technologist's radiation safety in routine clinical practice, in compliance with regulatory guidelines.

Project description:ObjectivesTo perform a comprehensive within-subject image quality analysis of abdominal CT examinations reconstructed with DLIR and to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared to the routinely applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.Materials and methodsOncologic patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Images were reconstructed with DLIR with three intensity levels of reconstruction (high, medium, and low) and ASiR-V at strength levels from 10 to 100% with a 10% interval. Three radiologists characterized the lesions and two readers assessed diagnostic accuracy and calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and subjective image quality, the latter with a 5-point Likert scale.ResultsFifty patients (mean age: 70 ± 10 years, 23 men) were enrolled and 130 liver lesions (105 benign lesions, 25 metastases) were identified. DLIR_H achieved the highest SNR and CNR, comparable to ASiR-V 100% (p ≥ .051). DLIR_M returned the highest subjective image quality (score: 5; IQR: 4-5; p ≤ .001) and significant median increase (29%) in FOM (p < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm: 32/33 lesions were detected with DLIR_M and 26 lesions were detected with ASiR-V 50% (p = .031). Lesion accuracy of was 93.8% (95% CI: 88.1, 97.3; 122 of 130 lesions) for DLIR and 87.7% (95% CI: 80.8, 92.8; 114 of 130 lesions) for ASiR-V 50%.ConclusionsDLIR yields superior image quality and provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ASiR-V in the assessment of hypovascular liver lesions, in particular for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.Clinical relevance statementDeep learning image reconstruction algorithm demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to iterative reconstruction in the identification of hypovascular liver lesions, especially for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.Key points• Iterative reconstruction algorithm impacts image texture, with negative effects on diagnostic capabilities. • Medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction algorithm outperforms iterative reconstruction in the diagnostic accuracy of ≤ 0.5 cm hypovascular liver lesions (93.9% vs 78.8%), also granting higher objective and subjective image quality. • Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm can be safely implemented in routine abdominal CT protocols in place of iterative reconstruction.

Project description:ObjectiveFew studies have explored the clinical feasibility of using deep-learning reconstruction to reduce the radiation dose of CT. We aimed to compare the image quality and lung nodule detectability between chest CT using a quarter of the low dose (QLD) reconstructed with vendor-agnostic deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and conventional low-dose (LD) CT reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR).Materials and methodsWe retrospectively collected 100 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53-70 years]) who received LDCT using a dual-source scanner, where total radiation was split into a 1:3 ratio. QLD CT was generated using a quarter dose and reconstructed with DLIR (QLD-DLIR), while LDCT images were generated using a full dose and reconstructed with IR (LD-IR). Three thoracic radiologists reviewed subjective noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality, and image noise was measured in five areas. The radiologists were also asked to detect all Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules, and their performance was evaluated using area under the jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic curve (AUFROC).ResultsThe median effective dose was 0.16 (IQR, 0.14-0.18) mSv for QLD CT and 0.65 (IQR, 0.57-0.71) mSv for LDCT. The radiologists' evaluations showed no significant differences in subjective noise (QLD-DLIR vs. LD-IR, lung-window setting; 3.23 ± 0.19 vs. 3.27 ± 0.22; P = .11), spatial resolution (3.14 ± 0.28 vs. 3.16 ± 0.27; P = .12), and overall image quality (3.14 ± 0.21 vs. 3.17 ± 0.17; P = .15). QLD-DLIR demonstrated lower measured noise than LD-IR in most areas (P < .001 for all). No significant difference was found between QLD-DLIR and LD-IR for the sensitivity (76.4% vs. 72.2%; P = .35) or the AUFROCs (0.77 vs. 0.78; P = .68) in detecting Lung-RADS category 3 or 4 nodules. Under a noninferiority limit of -0.1, QLD-DLIR showed noninferior detection performance (95% CI for AUFROC difference, -0.04 to 0.06).ConclusionQLD-DLIR images showed comparable image quality and noninferior nodule detectability relative to LD-IR images.

Project description:BackgroundRecently, computed tomography (CT) manufacturers have developed deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithms to compensate for the limitations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms, such as image smoothing and the spatial resolution's dependence on contrast and dose levels.PurposeTo assess the impact of an artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (AI-DLR) algorithm on image quality and dose reduction compared with a hybrid IR algorithm in chest CT for different clinical indications.MethodsAcquisitions on the CT American College of Radiology (ACR) 464 and CT Torso CTU-41 phantoms were performed at five dose levels (CTDIvol : 9.5/7.5/6/2.5/0.4 mGy) used for chest CT conditions. Raw data were reconstructed using filtered backprojection, two levels of IR (iDose4 levels 4 (i4) and 7 (i7)), and five levels of AI-DLR (Precise Image; Smoother, Smooth, Standard, Sharp, Sharper). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function, and detectability index (d') were computed: d'-modeled detection of a soft tissue mediastinal nodule (low-contrast soft tissue chest nodule within the mediastinum [LCN]), ground-glass opacity (GGO), or high-contrast pulmonary (HCP) lesion. The subjective image quality of chest anthropomorphic phantom images was independently evaluated by two radiologists. They assessed image noise, image smoothing, contrast between vessels and fat in the mediastinum for mediastinal images, visual border detection between bronchus and lung parenchyma for parenchymal images, and overall image quality using a commonly used four- or five-point scale.ResultsFrom Standard to Smoother levels, on average, the noise magnitude decreased (for all dose levels: -66.3% ± 0.5% for mediastinal images and -63.1% ± 0.1% for parenchymal images), the average NPS spatial frequency decreased (for all dose levels: -35.3% ± 2.2% for mediastinal images and -13.3% ± 2.2% for parenchymal images), and the detectability (d') of the three lesions increased. The opposite pattern was found from Standard to Sharper levels. From Smoother to Sharper levels, the spatial resolution increased for the low-contrast polyethylene insert and the opposite for the high-contrast air insert. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d' values were higher using Smoother (mean for all dose levels: 338.7% ± 29.4%), Smooth (103.4% ± 11.2%), and Standard (34.1% ± 6.6%) levels for the LCN on mediastinal images and Smoother (169.5% ± 53.2% for GGO and 136.9% ± 1.6% for HCP) and Smooth (36.4% ± 22.1% and 24.1% ± 0.9%, respectively) levels for parenchymal images. Radiologists considered the images satisfactory for clinical use at these levels, but adaptation to the dose level of the protocol is required.ConclusionWith AI-DLR, the smoothest levels reduced the noise and improved the detectability of chest lesions but increased the image smoothing. The opposite was found with the sharpest levels. The choice of level depends on the dose level and type of image: mediastinal or parenchymal.

Project description:Purpose To determine the effect of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction (IR) on noise, contrast, resolution, and observer-based detectability of subtle hypoattenuating liver lesions and to estimate the dose reduction potential of the IR algorithm in question. Materials and Methods This prospective, single-center, HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. A dual-source computed tomography (CT) system was used to reconstruct CT projection data from 21 patients into six radiation dose levels (12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) on the basis of two CT acquisitions. A series of virtual liver lesions (five per patient, 105 total, lesion-to-liver prereconstruction contrast of -15 HU, 12-mm diameter) were inserted into the raw CT projection data and images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) (B31f kernel) and sinogram-affirmed IR (SAFIRE) (I31f-5 kernel). Image noise (pixel standard deviation), lesion contrast (after reconstruction), lesion boundary sharpness (average normalized gradient at lesion boundary), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. Next, a two-alternative forced choice perception experiment was performed (16 readers [six radiologists, 10 medical physicists]). A linear mixed-effects statistical model was used to compare detection accuracy between FBP and SAFIRE and to estimate the radiation dose reduction potential of SAFIRE. Results Compared with FBP, SAFIRE reduced noise by a mean of 53% ± 5, lesion contrast by 12% ± 4, and lesion sharpness by 13% ± 10 but increased CNR by 89% ± 19. Detection accuracy was 2% higher on average with SAFIRE than with FBP (P = .03), which translated into an estimated radiation dose reduction potential (±95% confidence interval) of 16% ± 13. Conclusion SAFIRE increases detectability at a given radiation dose (approximately 2% increase in detection accuracy) and allows for imaging at reduced radiation dose (16% ± 13), while maintaining low-contrast detectability of subtle hypoattenuating focal liver lesions. This estimated dose reduction is somewhat smaller than that suggested by past studies. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:BackgroundThe image quality of computed tomography (CT) can be adversely affected by a low radiation dose, and reconstruction algorithms of an appropriate level may be useful in reducing this impact.MethodsEight sets of CT images of a phantom were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP); adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) at 30% (AV-30), 50% (AV-50), 80% (AV-80), and 100% (AV-100); and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) at low (DL-L), medium (DL-M), and high (DL-H) levels. The noise power spectrum (NPS) and task transfer function (TTF) were measured. Thirty consecutive patients underwent low-dose radiation contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans that were reconstructed using FBP, AV-30, AV-50, AV-80, and AV-100, and three levels of DLIR. The standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the hepatic parenchyma and paraspinal muscle were evaluated. Two radiologists assessed the subjective image quality and lesion diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale.ResultsIn the phantom study, both a higher DLIR and ASiR-V strength and a higher radiation dose led less noise. The NPS peak and average spatial frequency of the DLIR algorithms were closer to those of FBP, as the tube current increased and declined as the level of ASiR-V and DLIR strengthened. The NPS average spatial frequency of DL-L were higher than those of AISR-V. In clinical studies, AV-30 demonstrated a higher SD and lower SNR and CNR compared to DL-M and DL-H (P<0.05). For qualitative assessment, DL-M produced the highest qualitative image quality scores, with the exception of overall image noise (P<0.05). The NPS peak, average spatial frequency, and SD were the highest and the SNR, CNR, and subjective scores were the lowest with FBP.ConclusionsCompared with FBP and ASiR-V, DLIR provided better image quality and noise texture both in the phantom and clinical studies, and DL-M maintained the best image quality and lesion diagnostic confidence in low-dose radiation abdominal CT.