Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Somatrogon Compared with Once-Daily Somatropin (Genotropin®) in Japanese Children with Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency: Results from a Randomized Phase 3 Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Somatrogon is a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone being developed as a once-weekly treatment for children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The objective of this phase 3 study (NCT03874013) was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon with once-daily Genotropin in Japanese children with GHD.

Methods

In this open-label, randomized, active-controlled study, 44 prepubertal Japanese children with GHD (boys: 3 to <11 years; girls: 3 to <10 years) were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly somatrogon or once-daily Genotropin (0.025 mg/kg/day) for 12 months. Dose escalation for somatrogon-treated subjects occurred in the first 6 weeks (0.25, 0.48, and 0.66 mg/kg/week; 2 weeks each) with the remaining 46 weeks at a dose of 0.66 mg/kg/week. The study's primary endpoint was annualized height velocity (HV) at 12 months.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Compared with Genotropin-treated subjects, somatrogon-treated subjects had higher least-squares mean HV at 12 months (9.65 cm/year vs. 7.87 cm/year). Once-weekly somatrogon was concluded as being comparable to once-daily Genotropin as the mean treatment difference (somatrogon-Genotropin) in HV was +1.79 cm/year (95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.61), which was greater than the preestablished margin (-1.8 cm/year). For both treatment groups, most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and a similar proportion of subjects reported injection-site pain, although the somatrogon group reported more painful injections.

Conclusion

In prepubertal Japanese children with GHD, once-weekly somatrogon was comparable to once-daily Genotropin in terms of annualized (12-month) HV. Both treatments had similar safety and tolerability profiles.

SUBMITTER: Horikawa R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9533447 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Somatrogon Compared with Once-Daily Somatropin (Genotropin®) in Japanese Children with Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency: Results from a Randomized Phase 3 Study.

Horikawa Reiko R Tanaka Toshiaki T Hasegawa Yukihiro Y Yorifuji Tohru T Ng David D Rosenfeld Ron G RG Hoshino Yuko Y Okayama Akifumi A Shima Daisuke D Gomez Roy R Pastrak Aleksandra A Castellanos Orlando O

Hormone research in paediatrics 20220413 3

<h4>Introduction</h4>Somatrogon is a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone being developed as a once-weekly treatment for children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The objective of this phase 3 study (NCT03874013) was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon with once-daily Genotropin in Japanese children with GHD.<h4>Methods</h4>In this open-label, randomized, active-controlled study, 44 prepubertal Japanese children with GHD (boys: 3 to <11 years; girls: 3 to <1 ...[more]

PMID: 35417909

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Background Somatrogon is a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone (hGH) currently being developed as a once-weekly subcutaneous injectable treatment for pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). A recent global Phase 3 study compared the efficacy and safety of somatrogon administered once weekly with Genotropin administered once daily in pediatric patients with GHD (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02968004). Aims To understand and describe physicians’ experiences using once-weekly somatrogon injections compared with once-daily hGH injections during the Phase 3 study. Methods In this quantitative, cross-sectional, observational study, a 14-item multiple choice questionnaire was administered to physicians who were clinical investigators in the Phase 3 study. The questionnaire was designed to assess physicians’ experiences, preferences and satisfaction regarding the use of the once-weekly somatrogon regimen compared with the standard once-daily hGH injection regimen. Survey results were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 24 physicians who were part of the global Phase 3 study (mean age [SD]: 58.5 [10.1] years; 10 males, 14 females) in 12 different countries completed the on-line survey. Compared with daily injections, most physicians preferred somatrogon (n=18, 75.0%) and reported that somatrogon was more convenient (n=19, 79.2%), less burdensome (n=19, 79.2%) and that they would be more likely to prescribe somatrogon to patients in the future (n=20, 83.3%). In terms of being more likely to support positive long-term growth outcomes, 37.5% (n=9) of physicians selected somatrogon; the remaining physicians (n=15, 62.5%) reported no difference between treatments. The proportion of physicians who were satisfied or very satisfied with somatrogon was 95.8% (n=23), compared with 87.5% (n=21) for daily hGH injections. Most physicians (n=15, 62.5%) reported that daily hGH injections required more effort/much more effort to monitor adherence, compared with somatrogon. Some physicians (n=7, 29.2%) reported that explaining the device instructions to patient/caregivers required more/much more effort for somatrogon compared with daily hGH injections; more than half (n=14, 58.3%) reported no difference in effort required for either regimen. Physicians were divided as to which treatment needed more/much more effort to: (i) explain the injection regimen (n=7 [29.2%] daily injection; n=7 [29.2%] no difference; n=10 [41.7%] somatrogon), (ii) explain what to do if an injection is missed (n=7 [29.2%] daily injection; n=9 [37.5%] no difference; n=8 [33.3%] somatrogon), and (iii) address patient/caregiver questions (n=8 [33.3%] daily injection; n=11 [45.8%] no difference; n=5 [20.8%] somatrogon). Conclusions Overall, physicians from the global Phase 3 study were positive about their experience using somatrogon for the treatment of children with GHD. Physicians generally preferred the once-weekly somatrogon injection regimen, with most physicians reporting somatrogon to be more convenient and less burdensome to patients, indicating that they would be more likely to prescribe somatrogon to their patients in the future. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Project description:Abstract Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy currently requires daily injections. Somapacitan is a long-acting GH-derivative being developed for once-weekly (OW) use in children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD). A phase 2, multinational, randomized, open-label, controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02616562) investigated the efficacy and safety of OW somapacitan compared with daily GH (Norditropin® FlexPro®). GH-treatment-naïve prepubertal children with GH deficiency received 0.04 (n=16), 0.08 (n=15) or 0.16 mg/kg/wk (n=14) subcutaneous (sc) OW somapacitan, or sc GH 0.034 mg/kg/day (0.24 mg/kg/wk; n=14) for 52 wks, followed by a 104-wk safety extension with all patients on somapacitan receiving 0.16 mg/kg/wk while GH dose was unaltered. Safety endpoints included frequency of adverse events (AEs), including injection-site reactions, and occurrence of anti-somapacitan/anti-human growth hormone (hGH) antibodies. The 52-wk efficacy and safety results have been reported. We report here safety results at 104 wks’ total treatment. Number of AEs (% of patients) was as follows: OW somapacitan 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk, 51 (75%); 0.08/0.16 mg/kg/wk, 89 (80%); 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk, 89 (100%); and for daily GH, 82 (100%). Nasopharyngitis, influenza, allergic rhinitis and gastroenteritis were the most common AEs across all treatment groups. Pyrexia was more common in the OW somapacitan 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk (43.8%) and 0.08/0.16 mg/kg/wk (26.7%) groups vs the higher-dose OW somapacitan and daily GH groups (7.1% each). Most AEs were mild to moderate and unlikely related to treatment. Ten serious AEs were reported in five (8.5%) children and unlikely related to treatment, except two AEs of moderate severity during the first 26 wks: generalized edema and vomiting in one child on 0.16 mg/kg/wk OW somapacitan, rated as probably related to treatment although she was also given intravenous antibiotics for suspected infection. Injection-site reactions were reported in the 0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk (n=2) and 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk (n=1) OW somapacitan groups and in the daily GH group (n=1). Four children (0.04/0.16 mg/kg/wk) and one child (0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk) had transient anti-somapacitan antibodies; one child (0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk) had low-titer anti-somapacitan antibodies at two consecutive visits; in one child (daily GH group) with persistent low-titer anti-hGH antibodies, treatment was discontinued at wk 52. All antibodies were non-neutralizing. In conclusion, OW somapacitan was well tolerated at all doses, with no new safety or tolerability issues identified after up to 104 wks of treatment. The frequency, severity and type of AEs were similar in the OW somapacitan and daily GH treatment groups except for pyrexia, which was unlikely related to treatment and more frequently reported in the lowest dose somapacitan group.

Project description:Abstract Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding human growth hormone (GH) derivative based on a proven protraction technology. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-weekly somapacitan compared with daily GH (Norditropin®) over 52 weeks in Japanese patients with adult GH deficiency (AGHD). This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active-controlled trial (NCT03075644). Patients previously treated with human GH were randomized 1:3 to either daily GH or somapacitan, respectively, to undergo 20 weeks of dose titration and 32 weeks of fixed-dose treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) from baseline to week 53. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in visceral, subcutaneous and total adipose tissue (VAT, SAT and TAT, respectively) assessed with computerized tomography scans; change from baseline in treatment satisfaction evaluated using Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) scores; and occurrence of anti-somapacitan antibodies. In total, 62 patients were randomized (16 to the daily GH and 46 to the somapacitan treatment arm), of which 60 completed the trial. Baseline characteristics for daily GH vs somapacitan groups, respectively, were: 43.8% vs 47.8% female, 87.5% vs 80.4% adult-onset GH deficiency, mean (SD) age 49.3 (11.5) vs 54.1 (12.1) years, weight 67.9 (12.0) vs 69.4 (22.7) kg, body mass index 24.8 (3.7) vs 26.4 (6.7) kg/m2, and GH dose at screening 0.29 (0.14) vs 0.31 (0.17) mg. Rate of AEs per 100 patient-years was similar between treatment arms (309.8 for daily GH, 312.7 for once-weekly somapacitan); most AEs were mild (97.9% and 93.1%, respectively) and none were severe. Four AEs in the somapacitan arm were serious; all were considered unlikely related to treatment. No anti-somapacitan antibodies were detected during treatment. Mean insulin-like growth factor-I standard deviation score (IGF-I SDS) at baseline was maintained with both treatments. The majority of the patients had IGF-I SDS values below +2. No significant differences in VAT, SAT and TAT were seen in both treatment groups after 52 weeks (estimated difference, somapacitan – daily GH [95% CI]): –1.74 [–18.13; 14.66], –11.53 [–35.54; 12.48], and –12.85 [–47.31; 21.62] cm2, respectively. TSQM-9 scores were not significantly different between treatments, but showed a tendency in favor of somapacitan (estimated difference [95% CI]): 4.87 [–3.46; 13.20] for effectiveness, 6.79 [–1.04; 14.61] for convenience, and 6.88 [–1.08; 14.85] for overall satisfaction. No new safety concerns were identified. Improvements in body composition were similar in the GH and somapacitan cohorts. The safety and tolerability of somapacitan in Japanese patients with AGHD were consistent with results from the global phase 3 trial (REAL 1).

Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Somatrogon Compared with Once-Daily Somatropin (Genotropin®) in Japanese Children with Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency: Results from a Randomized Phase 3 Study.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Somatrogon Compared with Once-Daily Somatropin (Genotropin®) in Japanese Children with Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency: Results from a Randomized Phase 3 Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets