Dataset Information

Induced resistance to ifosfamide in osteosarcoma cells suggests a more aggressive tumor profile.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone sarcoma among children and adolescents. Treatment is based on neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, using the standard drugs cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide (IFO). Due to the high capacity of tumor resistance, the current work aimed to analyze genes related to cycle control and cell differentiation in OS cells sensitive to and with induced resistance to IFO. This was to assess whether the differentiated expression of these genes may affect resistance to the drug IFO used in OS treatment, and thus establish possible biomarkers of disease progression.

Materials and methods

In this work, the treatment-sensitive OS U2OS lineage was used, and the same lineage was submitted to the process of induction of IFO resistance. These cells were evaluated by MTT, migration and proliferation assays and submitted to gene expression analysis.

Key findings

The results demonstrate that after induction of resistance to IFO, resistant U2OS cells show a more aggressive tumor behavior, with greater capacity for cell migration, proliferation, and invasion compared to sensitive cells. Gene analysis indicates that resistance-induced cells have differentiated expression of the genes EPB41L3, GADD45A, IER3, OXCT1, UBE2L6, UBE2A ALPL, and EFNB2. Our results suggest new perspectives on possible resistance biomarkers, especially the genes EFNB2 and EPB41L3, given that these genes have rarely been studied their expression linked to osteosarcoma. They show how the resistance induction model can be useful for studies on tumor cell behavior.

SUBMITTER: de Oliveira Rodrigues MT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9535421 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Induced resistance to ifosfamide in osteosarcoma cells suggests a more aggressive tumor profile.

de Oliveira Rodrigues Maria Tereza MT Pereira da Silva Lucas L Pogue Robert Edward RE de Carvalho Juliana Lott JL Motoyama Andrea Barretto AB de Alencar E Silva Thuany T Brunel Hilana Dos Santos Sena HDSS de Sá Maria Fátima Grossi MFG Vieira de Andrade Rosângela R

Biochemistry and biophysics reports 20221004

<h4>Aims</h4>Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone sarcoma among children and adolescents. Treatment is based on neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, using the standard drugs cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide (IFO). Due to the high capacity of tumor resistance, the current work aimed to analyze genes related to cycle control and cell differentiation in OS cells sensitive to and with induced resistance to IFO. This was to assess whether the differentiat ...[more]

PMID: 36213144

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe effectiveness of second-line palliative chemotherapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma is not well defined. Several small studies (6-19 patients) have reported on ifosfamide as second-line treatment. In this study we report our single-center experience with second-line ifosfamide monotherapy in patients treated for recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma.MethodsA chart review was conducted of all patients with osteosarcoma treated with ifosfamide from 1978 until 2017. Until 1997 a 5 g/m2 regimen was used, and from 1997 onwards a 9 g/m2 regimen was used. Overall survival (OS) from start of ifosfamide was the primary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment was also studied. To assess difference in survival between groups the log rank test was applied. To investigate the effect of ifosfamide dose and World Health Organization performance status (PS) a Cox proportional hazard regression model was estimated.ResultsSixty-two patients were selected with recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma treated with second-line ifosfamide monotherapy (dose of 5 g/m2 , n = 26; 9 g/m2 , n = 36). OS was significantly better in univariate analysis for 9 g/m2 compared with 5 g/m2 (10.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.3-12.6] vs. 6.7 months [95% CI, 5.9-7.6], respectively) and for PS (median OS PS 0, 13.0 months [95% CI, 2.3-23.8]; PS 1, 8.2 months [95% CI, 5.4-11.1]; PS ≥2, 6.2 months [95% CI, 2.2-10.3]; and unknown PS, 5.4 months [95% CI, 2.2-8.5]). In multivariate analysis only PS showed a significant difference. No difference in PFS was found between 5 and 9 g/m2 ifosfamide treatment or PS.ConclusionThis study suggests that ifosfamide is an effective second-line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic osteosarcoma.Implications for practiceIfosfamide monotherapy is commonly used as second-line treatment in osteosarcoma, although large series to support this are lacking. This retrospective study reports overall and progression-free survival for regimens with 5 g/m2 and with 9 g/m2 . This study was unable to show a significant difference in survival between 5 and 9 g/m2 but showed an important impact of World Health Organization performance status on overall survival. This study sets a standard and reference for comparison with the multiple phase II studies under development.

Dataset Information

Induced resistance to ifosfamide in osteosarcoma cells suggests a more aggressive tumor profile.

Aims

Materials and methods

Key findings

Publications

Induced resistance to ifosfamide in osteosarcoma cells suggests a more aggressive tumor profile.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets