Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Polygenic risk scores (PRS), which offer information about genomic risk for common diseases, have been proposed for clinical implementation. The ways in which PRS information may influence a patient's health trajectory depend on how both the patient and their primary care provider (PCP) interpret and act on PRS information. We aimed to probe patient and PCP responses to PRS clinical reporting choices METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews of both patients (N=25) and PCPs (N=21) exploring responses to mock PRS clinical reports of two different designs: binary and continuous representations of PRS.Results
Many patients did not understand the numbers representing risk, with high numeracy patients being the exception. However, all the patients still understo
SUBMITTER: Lewis ACF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9540716 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature