Dataset Information

MYC amplification-conferred primary resistance to capmatinib in a MET-amplified NSCLC patient: a case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Capmatinib, a potent and selective mesenchymalepithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor, is an effective treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutations or gene amplification. However, the mechanisms that confer resistance to capmatinib remain elusive. Here, we present a case of primary resistance to capmatinib in a MET-amplified NSCLC patient which was conferred by concurrent MYC amplification.

Case description

Capmatinib was administered as first-line treatment in an 82-year-old MET-amplified [gene copy number (GCN) 13.5] and MET overexpressed (immunohistochemical staining 3+/3, >50%) NSCLC patient. However, the tumor rapidly progressed and showed primary resistance to capmatinib. Next-generation target sequencing using rebiopsy tumor samples revealed MYC amplification. We also performed functional drug susceptibility testing using patient-derived cells (PDCs), which showed overexpression of MYC mRNA and resistance to capmatinib. Meanwhile, ICX-101, an investigational MYC inhibitor, successfully inhibited the growth of PDCs at a relatively low IC50 value. Also, a synergistic effect was shown when capmatinib treatment was followed by ICX-101.

Conclusions

Concurrent MYC amplification could potentially confer primary resistance to capmatinib in highly MET amplified NSCLC patients. Further clinical studies are warranted to corroborate these findings, and treatment with MYC inhibitors could be suggested as an alternative therapeutic strategy for this subset of patients.

SUBMITTER: Choi W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9554684 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

MYC amplification-conferred primary resistance to capmatinib in a <i>MET</i>-amplified NSCLC patient: a case report.

Choi Wonyoung W Jeong Kyung-Chae KC Park Seog-Yun SY Kim Sunshin S Kang Eun Hye EH Hwang Mihwa M Han Ji-Youn JY

Translational lung cancer research 20220901 9

<h4>Background</h4>Capmatinib, a potent and selective mesenchymalepithelial transition factor (MET) inhibitor, is an effective treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with <i>MET</i> exon 14 skipping mutations or gene amplification. However, the mechanisms that confer resistance to capmatinib remain elusive. Here, we present a case of primary resistance to capmatinib in a <i>MET</i>-amplified NSCLC patient which was conferred by concurrent <i>MYC</i> amplification.<h4>Ca ...[more]

PMID: 36248327

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options for patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs remain unclear. Methods: In total, 33 patients harboring primary MET amplification and 9 patients harboring acquired MET alterations identified by next-generation sequencing were enrolled. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different therapeutics. In addition, studies reporting various treatments for patients harboring MET alterations were included in the meta-analysis. Results: In our cohort of patients harboring primary MET amplification, crizotinib displayed better efficacy than immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as demonstrated both in first-line (P = .0378) and second-line treatment regimens (P = .0181). The disease control rates for crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy were 81.8%, 72.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time after immunotherapy in patients harboring MET amplification and high programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>50%) was only 77.5 days. The meta-analysis revealed that the median PFS times after crizotinib and immunotherapy were 4.57 and 2.94 months, respectively. In patients harboring acquired MET amplification, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had superior efficacy (310.0 days vs 73.5 days, P = .0360) compared with MET-TKIs ± EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a low response in patients harboring MET alterations, even those with concurrent high PD-L1 expression. MET-TKIs might be an optional treatment with worth-expecting efficacy. However, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab could benefit the subpopulation of patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of EGFR-TKIs.

Project description:IntroductionMET amplification is a known resistance mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Dual EGFR-MET inhibition has been reported with success in overcoming such resistance and inducing clinical benefit. Resistance mechanisms to dual EGFR-MET inhibition require further investigation and characterization.MethodsPatients with NSCLC with both MET amplification and EGFR mutation who have received crizotinib, capmatinib, savolitinib, or tepotinib plus osimertinib (OSI) after progression on OSI at MD Anderson Cancer Center were included in this study. Molecular profiling was completed by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Radiological response was assessed on the basis of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.ResultsFrom March 2016 to March 2022, 23 treatments with dual MET inhibitor and osi were identified with a total of 20 patients included. Three patients received capmatinib plus OSI after progression on crizotinib plus OSI. Median age was 64 (38-89) years old and 75% were female. MET amplification was detected by FISH in 14 patients in the tissue, NGS in 10 patients, and circulating tumor DNA in three patients. Median MET gene copy number was 13.6 (6.4-20). Overall response rate was 34.8% (eight of 23). In assessable patients, tumor shrinkage was observed in 82.4% (14 of 17). Median time on treatment was 27 months. Two of three patients responded to capmatinib plus OSI after progression on crizotinib plus OSI. Dual EGFR-MET inhibition was overall well tolerated. Two patients on crizotinib plus OSI and one pt on capmatinib plus OSI discontinued therapy due to pneumonitis. One pt discontinued crizotinib plus OSI due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Six patients were still on double TKI treatment. At disease progression to dual EGFR-MET inhibition, FISH and NGS on tumor and plasma were completed in six patients. Notable resistance mechanisms observed include acquired MET D1246H (n = 1), acquired EGFR C797S (n = 2), FGFR2 fusion (n = 1, concurrent with C797S), and EGFR G796S (n = 1, concurrent with C797S). Four patients lost MET amplification.ConclusionsDual EGFR and MET inhibition yielded high clinical response rate after progression on OSI. Resistance mechanisms to EGFR-MET double TKI inhibition include MET secondary mutation, EGFR secondary mutation, or loss of MET amplification.