Dataset Information

Comparative analysis of mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines: A study from Faisalabad district of Pakistan.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Pakistan has vaccinated over 122 million people. The two vaccines in widespread use are inactivated (BBIBP-CorV & Sinovac) and mRNA forms (BNT162b2 & mRNA-1273). The primary aim of this study was to compare these two forms of vaccines against unvaccinated individuals collectively and then to see which one is more efficacious.

Methods

Case-control study design was used to compare the efficacy of inactivated and mRNA vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalisations and mortality due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. We derived recovery time from illness for both vaccines. Furthermore, we also compared the vaccines against similar parameters (symptomatic disease, hospitalisations and mortality). We calculated crude odds ratios for each dependent variable. p value of 0.05 or below was considered significant.

Results

Vaccinated individuals were significantly protected from hospitalisations and mortality compared to unvaccinated individuals (p < 0.001). There was no difference in protection from symptomatic disease (p = 0.28), hospitalisations (p = 0.59) and mortality (p = 0.53) between two forms of vaccines. mRNA vaccine had better recovery time than all other vaccines (p < 0.001).

Discussion

Our study showed that vaccinated individuals are at low risk of hospitalisations and mortality even without a booster and both vaccine forms are equally effective at preventing hospitalisations and mortality.

SUBMITTER: Ul Munamm SA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9557273 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative analysis of mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines: A study from Faisalabad district of Pakistan.

Ul Munamm Syed Ata SA Nadeem Iftikhar I Mahdi Noor N Saqlain Muhammad M Rana Zaid Khalid ZK Khatana Usman Feroze UF Bhatty Umer Mustansir UM Navayogaarajah Visakan V Khan Fatimah Mahsal FM Ur Rasool Masood M

The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 20220901 3

<h4>Background</h4>Pakistan has vaccinated over 122 million people. The two vaccines in widespread use are inactivated (BBIBP-CorV & Sinovac) and mRNA forms (BNT162b2 & mRNA-1273). The primary aim of this study was to compare these two forms of vaccines against unvaccinated individuals collectively and then to see which one is more efficacious.<h4>Methods</h4>Case-control study design was used to compare the efficacy of inactivated and mRNA vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalisation ...[more]

PMID: 36222203

Similar Datasets

Project description:Two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are being rolled out. Despite the high volume of emerging evidence regarding adverse events (AEs) associated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, previous studies have thus far been largely based on the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated control, possibly highlighting the AE risks with COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Comparing the safety profile of mRNA vaccinated individuals with otherwise vaccinated individuals would enable a more relevant assessment for the safety of mRNA vaccination. We designed a comparative safety study between 18 755 and 27 895 individuals who reported to VigiBase for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with mRNA COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, respectively, from January 1, 2020, to January 17, 2021. We employed disproportionality analysis to rapidly detect relevant safety signals and compared comparative risks of a diverse span of AEFIs for the vaccines. The safety profile of novel mRNA vaccines was divergent from that of influenza vaccines. The overall pattern suggested that systematic reactions like chill, myalgia, fatigue were more noticeable with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, while injection site reactogenicity events were more prevalent with the influenza vaccine. Compared to the influenza vaccine, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated a significantly higher risk for a few manageable cardiovascular complications, such as hypertensive crisis (adjusted reporting odds ratio [ROR], 12.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47-65.54), and supraventricular tachycardia (adjusted ROR, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.62-24.00), but lower risk of neurological complications such as syncope, neuralgia, loss of consciousness, Guillain-Barre syndrome, gait disturbance, visual impairment, and dyskinesia. This study has not identified significant safety concerns regarding mRNA vaccination in real-world settings. The overall safety profile patterned a lower risk of serious AEFI following mRNA vaccines compared to influenza vaccines.

Project description:Background & aimsCase reports of severe acute liver injury (ALI) following COVID-19 vaccination have recently been published. We evaluated the risks of ALI following COVID-19 vaccination (BNT162b2 or CoronaVac).MethodsWe conducted a modified self-controlled case series analysis using the vaccination records in Hong Kong with data linkage to electronic medical records from a territory-wide healthcare database. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for ALI outcome in the 56-day period following first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccines in comparison to the non-exposure period were estimated and compared to the ALI risk in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.ResultsAmong 2,343,288 COVID-19 vaccine recipients who were at risk, 4,677 patients developed ALI for the first time between 23rd February 2021 to 30th September 2021. The number of ALI cases within 56 days after the first and second dose of vaccination were 307 and 521 (335 and 334 per 100,000 person-years) for BNT162b2, and 304 and 474 (358 and 403 per 100,000 person-years) for CoronaVac, respectively, compared to 32,997 ALI cases per 100,000 person-years among patients within 56 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared to the non-exposure period, no increased risk was observed in the 56-day risk period for first (IRR 0.800; 95% CI 0.680-0.942) and second (IRR 0.944; 95% CI 0.816-1.091) dose of BNT162b2, or first (IRR 0.689; 95% CI 0.588-0.807) and second (IRR 0.905; 95% CI 0.781-1.048) dose of CoronaVac. There were no severe or fatal cases of ALI following COVID-19 vaccination.ConclusionThere was no evidence of an increased risk of ALI associated with BNT162b2 or CoronaVac vaccination. Based on all current available evidence from previous studies and our study, the benefit of mass vaccination far outweighs the ALI risk from vaccination.Lay summaryThere have been some recent reports that COVID-19 vaccination could be associated with acute liver injury. In our study, we found no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination increased the risk of acute liver injury, which was much more common after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after vaccination. Hence, our study provides further data indicating that the benefits of mass COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks.

Project description:ImportanceLimited randomized clinical trial data exist on the safety of simultaneous administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines.ObjectiveTo compare the reactogenicity, safety, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after simultaneous vs sequential receipt of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4).Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted between October 8, 2021, and June 14, 2023, at 3 US sites. Participants were nonpregnant persons aged 5 years or older with the intention of receiving both influenza and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.InterventionsIntramuscular administration in opposite arms of either IIV4 or saline placebo simultaneously with mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at visit 1. Those who received placebo at visit 1 received IIV4 and those who received IIV4 at visit 1 received placebo 1 to 2 weeks later at visit 2.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary composite reactogenicity outcome was the proportion of participants with fever, chills, myalgia, and/or arthralgia of moderate or greater severity within 7 days after vaccination visits 1 and/or 2, using a 10% noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes were solicited reactogenicity events and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) for 7 days after each visit separately and HRQOL after visit 1, assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index. Serious AEs (SAEs) and AEs of special interest (AESIs) were assessed for 121 days. Outcomes were compared between groups.ResultsA total of 335 persons (mean [SD] age, 33.4 [15.1] years) were randomized (169 to the simultaneous group and 166 to the sequential group); 211 (63.0%) were female, and 255 (76.1%) received bivalent BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The proportion with the primary composite reactogenicity outcome in the simultaneous group (25.6% [n = 43]) was noninferior to the proportion in the sequential group (31.3% [n = 52]) (site-adjusted difference, -5.6 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -15.2 to 4.0 pp). Respective proportions in each group were similar after each visit separately (visit 1, 40 [23.8%] vs 47 [28.3%]; visit 2, 5 [3.0%] vs 9 [5.4%]). No significant group differences in participants with AEs (21 [12.4%] vs 16 [9.6%]), SAEs (1 [0.6%] vs 1 [0.6%]), and AESIs (19 [11.2%] vs 9 [5.4%]) were observed in the simultaneous vs sequential groups, respectively. Among participants with severe reactogenicity, the mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L Index score decreased from 0.92 (0.08) to 0.92 (0.09) prevaccination to 0.81 (0.09) to 0.82 (0.12) postvaccination.Conclusions and relevanceIn this randomized clinical trial assessing simultaneous vs sequential administration of mRNA COVID-19 and IIV4 vaccines, reactogenicity was comparable in both groups. These findings support the option of simultaneous administration of these vaccines.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05028361.

Project description:ImportanceAssessing booster effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine over longer time intervals and in response to any further SARS-CoV-2 variants is crucial in determining optimal COVID-19 vaccination strategies.ObjectiveTo determine levels of protection against severe COVID-19 and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by types and combinations of vaccine boosters in Singapore during the Omicron wave.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study included Singapore residents aged 30 years or more vaccinated with either at least 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (ie, Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (Sinovac CoronaVac or Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV) as of March 10, 2022. Individuals with a known SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to December 27, 2021, an infection on or before the date of their second vaccine dose, or with reinfection cases were excluded.ExposuresTwo or 3 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2, Moderna mRNA-1273, Sinovac CoronaVac, or Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV.Main outcomes and measuresNotified infections from December 27, 2021, to March 10, 2022, adjusted for age, sex, race, housing status, and calendar days. Estimated booster effectiveness, defined as the relative incidence-rate reduction of severe disease (supplemental oxygen, intensive care, or death) or confirmed infection following 3-dose vaccination compared with 5 months after second mRNA dose, was determined using binomial regression.ResultsAmong 2 441 581 eligible individuals (1 279 047 [52.4%] women, 846 110 (34.7%) aged 60 years and older), there were 319 943 (13.1%) confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, of which 1513 (0.4%) were severe COVID-19 cases. mRNA booster effectiveness against confirmed infection 15 to 60 days after boosting was estimated to range from 31.7% to 41.3% for the 4 boosting combinations (homologous BNT162b2, homologous mRNA-1273, 2-dose BNT162b2/mRNA-1273 booster, and 2-dose mRNA-1273/BNT162b2 booster). Five months and more after boosting, estimated booster effectiveness against confirmed infection waned, ranging from -2.8% to 14.6%. Against severe COVID-19, estimated mRNA booster effectiveness was 87.4% (95% CI, 83.3%-90.5%) 15 to 60 days after boosting and 87.2% (95% CI, 84.2%-89.7%) 5 to 6 months after boosting, with no significant difference comparing vaccine combinations. Booster effectiveness against severe COVID-19 15 days to 330 days after 3-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of combination, was estimated to be 69.6% (95% CI, 48.7%-81.9%).Conclusions and relevanceBooster mRNA vaccine protection against severe COVID-19 was estimated to be durable over 6 months. Three-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination provided greater protection than 2-dose but weaker protection compared with 3-dose mRNA.

Dataset Information

Comparative analysis of mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines: A study from Faisalabad district of Pakistan.

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Comparative analysis of mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines: A study from Faisalabad district of Pakistan.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets