Quantitative Autofluorescence Following Gene Therapy With Voretigene Neparvovec.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Levi SR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9578385 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Quantitative Autofluorescence Following Gene Therapy With Voretigene Neparvovec.
Levi Sarah R SR Oh Jin Kyun JK de Carvalho Jose Ronaldo Lima JRL Mahajan Vinit B VB Tsang Stephen H SH Sparrow Janet R JR
JAMA ophthalmology 20200801 8
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionLeber congenital amaurosis (LCA) type 2, due to disease-causing variants in RPE65, is characterized by severe visual loss in early infancy. Current treatments include voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (VN) for RPE65-associated LCA. Herein, we present the long-term follow-up of a patient treated with VN using quantitative autofluorescence (488 nm excitation).Case reportA 9-year-old girl with a diagnosis of LCA with biallelic variants in RPE65 presented for evaluation. The patient underwent VN treatment at the age of 11. The patient returned to clinic at age of 19 at which time imaging revealed evidence of chorioretinal atrophy. Quantitative autofluorescence performed prior to gene therapy and at 6- and 8-year follow-up revealed a central area of fundus autofluorescence.DiscussionThis case report demonstrates acquisition of fundus autofluorescence at 6- and 8-year follow-up despite the development of chorioretinal atrophy.
| S-EPMC9651599 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gene therapy has now evolved as the upcoming modality for management of many disorders, both inheritable and non-inheritable. Knowledge of genetics pertaining to a disease has therefore become paramount for physicians across most specialities. Inheritable retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are notorious for progressive and relentless vision loss, frequently culminating in complete blindness in both eyes. Leber's congenital amaurosis (LCA) is a typical example of an IRD that manifests very early in childhood. Research in gene therapy has led to the development and approval of voretigene neparvovec (VN) for use in patients of LCA with a deficient biallelic RPE65 gene. The procedure involves delivery of a recombinant virus vector that carries the RPE65 gene in the subretinal space. This comprehensive review reports the evidence thus far in support of gene therapy for LCA. We explore and compare the various gene targets including but not limited to RPE65, and discuss the choice of vector and method for ocular delivery. The review details the evolution of gene therapy with VN in a phased manner, concluding with the challenges that lie ahead for its translation for use in communities that differ much both genetically and economically.
| S-EPMC7701157 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Leber congenital amaurosis caused by mutations in the RPE65 gene belongs to the most severe early-onset hereditary childhood retinopathies naturally progressing to legal blindness. The novel gene therapy voretigene neparvovec is the first approved causative treatment option for this devastating eye disease and is specifically designed to treat RPE65-mediated retinal dystrophies. Herein, we present a follow-up of the youngest treated patients in Germany so far, including four pre-school children who received treatment with voretigene neparvovec at a single treatment center between January 2020 and May 2022. All patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy with circumferential peeling of the internal limiting membrane at the injection site and subretinal injection of voretigene neparvovec. Pre- and postoperative diagnostics included imaging (spectral domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fundus wide-angle imaging), electrophysiologic examination (ERG), retinal light sensitivity measurements (FST) and visual acuity testing. Behavioral changes were assessed using a questionnaire and by observing the children's vision-guided behavior in different levels of illumination. All children showed marked increase in vision-guided behavior shortly after therapy, as well as marked increase in visual acuity in the postoperative course up to full visual acuity in one child. Two eyes showed partial electrophysiological recovery of an ERG that was undetectable before treatment-a finding that has not been described in humans before.
| S-EPMC9855623 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo report on cases of unilateral perimacular atrophy after treatment with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl, in the setting of previous contralateral eye treatment with a different viral vector.DesignSingle-center, retrospective chart review.MethodsIn this case series, four patients between the ages of six and 11 years old with RPE65-related retinopathy were treated unilaterally with rAAV2-CB-hRPE65 as part of a gene augmentation clinical trial (NCT00749957). Six to 10 years later the contralateral eyes were treated with the Food and Drug Administration-approved drug, voretigene neparvovec-rzyl. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus photos, ocular coherence tomography, two-color dark-adapted perimetry, full field stimulus threshold testing (FST), and location of subretinal bleb and chorioretinal atrophy were evaluated.ResultsThree out of four patients showed unilateral perimacular atrophy after treatment with voretigene, ranging from five to 22 months after treatment. Areas of robust visual field improvement were followed by areas of chorioretinal atrophy. Despite perimacular changes, BCVA, FST, and subjective improvements in vision and nyctalopia were maintained. Perimacular atrophy was not observed in the first eye treated with the previous viral vector.ConclusionsWe observed areas of robust visual field improvement followed by perimacular atrophy in voretigene treated eyes, as compared to the initially treated contralateral eyes.Translational relevanceCaution is advised when using two different viral vectors between eyes in gene therapy. This may become an important issue in the future with increasing gene therapy clinical trials for inherited retinal dystrophies.
| S-EPMC11186569 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo report an anatomic change following subretinal injection of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (VN) for RPE65-mediated Leber congenital amaurosis.DesignMulticenter, retrospective chart review.ParticipantsPatients who underwent subretinal VN injection at each of 4 participating institutions.MethodsPatients were identified as having perifoveal chorioretinal atrophy if (1) the areas of atrophy were not directly related to the touch-down site of the subretinal cannula; and (2) the area of atrophy progressively enlarged over time. Demographic data, visual acuity, refractive error, fundus photographs, OCT, visual fields, and full-field stimulus threshold (FST) were analyzed.Main outcome measuresOutcome measures included change in visual acuity, FST, visual fields, and location of atrophy relative to subretinal bleb position.ResultsA total of 18 eyes of 10 patients who underwent subretinal injection of VN were identified as having developed perifoveal chorioretinal atrophy. Eight of 10 patients (80%) developed bilateral atrophy. The mean age was 11.6 years (range, 5-20 years), and 6 patients (60%) were male. Baseline mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity and FST were 0.82 (standard deviation [SD], 0.51) and -1.3 log cd.s/m2 (SD, 0.44), respectively. The mean spherical equivalent was -5.7 diopters (D) (range, -11.50 to +1.75 D). Atrophy was identifiable at an average of 4.7 months (SD, 4.3) after surgery and progressively enlarged in all cases up to a mean follow-up period of 11.3 months (range, 4-18 months). Atrophy developed within and outside the area of the subretinal bleb in 10 eyes (55.5%), exclusively within the area of the bleb in 7 eyes (38.9%), and exclusively outside the bleb in 1 eye (5.5%). There was no significant change in visual acuity (P = 0.45). There was a consistent improvement in FST with a mean improvement of -3.21 log cd.s/m2 (P < 0.0001). Additionally, all 13 eyes with reliable Goldmann visual fields demonstrated improvement, but 3 eyes (23.1%) demonstrated paracentral scotomas related to the atrophy.ConclusionsA subset of patients undergoing subretinal VN injection developed progressive perifoveal chorioretinal atrophy after surgery. Further study is necessary to determine what ocular, surgical delivery, and vector-related factors predispose to this complication.
| S-EPMC8497635 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceVoretigene neparvovec-rzyl, the first gene therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, was approved for the treatment for RPE65-mediated inherited retinal disease (IRD) in December 2017. This gene therapy is associated with high up-front costs and high efficacy, although of unknown duration, and its cost-effectiveness has not been assessed with RPE65 IRD-specific, longitudinal, patient-observation-level data.ObjectiveTo assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl compared with standard care for RPE65-mediated inherited retinal disease.Design, setting, and participantsIn this economic analysis, a health state transition model based on visual acuity and field with a lifetime horizon was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl. The model was populated with data from a clinical trial of voretigene neparvovec-rzyl to evaluate treatment outcome and a natural history study of RPE65-mediated IRD to examine disease progression. Direct costs were derived from the literature. Indirect costs, including educational attainment, productivity, caregiver burden, and governmental programs, were estimated using published literature and data analysis of public national surveys. A health utility vignette study specific to RPE65-mediated IRD was used for health utility inputs. The cost-effectiveness study described in this article was conducted from September 15, 2017, to August 23, 2018.ExposuresBilateral voretigene neparvovec-rzyl therapy or standard care.Main outcomes and measuresIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio.ResultsThe model population included 70 patients with RPE65-mediated IRD, with a mean age of 15 years; 42 of 70 patients (60%) were female. In the base case, voretigene neparvovec-rzyl compared with standard care was associated with lower total costs ($2.2 million vs $2.8 million) and higher quality-adjusted life-years (18.1 vs 8.6). Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl remains cost-effective if at least 8.8% of the long-term treatment effect continues after year 3 when including indirect costs and 43.3% when excluding indirect costs, assuming a cost threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this study suggest that voretigene neparvovec-rzyl is cost-effective compared with standard care when using a lifetime horizon, excluding indirect costs, and using a threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year.
| S-EPMC6646972 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo investigate real-world safety and efficacy of voretigene neparvovec gene therapy administration in pediatric patients with biallelic RPE65 disease-causing variants.MethodsA retrospective study of 27 eyes of 14 patients with RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis examined postoperative complications and longitudinal changes in photoreceptor function following treatment with subretinal injection of voretigene neparvovec. Full-field stimulus threshold testing (FST), Goldmann visual fields (GVF), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were collected preoperatively and up to 12 months posttreatment.ResultsBaseline through 6-12 month follow-up FST and GVF data were obtained for 13 eyes of 7 patients. FST improved for each eye after treatment with a mean improvement of 2.1 log-units (P < 0.001) and GVF improved for each eye with a mean improvement of 221 sum degrees (P < 0.001). BCVA improved from logMAR 0.98 at baseline to logMAR 0.83 at last follow-up (P < 0.001). Across 19 eyes of 10 patients included in CST analysis, there was a small but statistically significant 9-μ decrease in mean CST from baseline to last follow-up (P < 0.001). The most common postoperative issues included elevation in intraocular pressure (59%), persistent intraocular inflammation (15%), and vitreous opacities (26%) that resolved over a period of months.ConclusionsThis report provides some of the earliest longitudinal real-world evidence of the pediatric safety and efficacy of voretigene neparvovec using multiple functional and structural measures of the retina. Outcomes demonstrate significant improvements in visual function consistent with clinical trial results.
| S-EPMC9010358 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo investigate the effect of systemic chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (CQ/HCQ) on outer retinal health using quantitative fundus autofluorescence (QAF) imaging.MethodsFor this prospective, cross-sectional study, 44 CQ/HCQ patients and 25 age-matched controls underwent multimodal retinal imaging including QAF (488 nm) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in addition to the recommended CQ/HCQ screening procedures. Custom written FIJI plugins enabled detailed QAF analysis and correlation with retinal thickness and comparison to the healthy controls.ResultsOut of 44 patients, 29 (mean age 43.5 ± 12.2, range 22-59 years) exposed to CQ/HCQ (mean cumulative dose 724.2 ± 610.4 g, median 608.0 g, range 18.6-2171.0 g) met eligibility criteria. Four of these 29 patients had bull's-eye maculopathy (BEM). Mean QAF values were significantly higher in CQ/HCQ patients than in healthy controls. QAF increase started early after treatment onset, remained high even years after treatment cessation, and was not accompanied by pathologies in the other screening methods, including retinal thicknesses (except in BEM patients).ConclusionsQAF might be a useful tool in retinal imaging and in verifying systemic CQ/HCQ intake. The early onset and preserved high levels of QAF parallel findings of CQ deposition in the retina in animal models. Whether QAF can be used as a screening tool to detect early CQ/HCQ related maculopathy is the subject of long-term ongoing studies.Translation relevanceExperimental QAF imaging in systemic CQ/HCQ therapy monitoring might be a useful tool to indicate the drug or its metabolites and to detect metabolic retinal changes.
| S-EPMC7463177 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionVoretigene neparvovec (VN) is a gene therapy and the first approved pharmacological treatment for biallelic RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD), a rare condition that starts in early life and causes vision to progressively deteriorate towards complete blindness. In a phase III trial, treatment with VN significantly improved functional vision and visual function, and in October 2019 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Highly Specialised Technologies (HST) process recommended VN for patients in England and Wales. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of VN compared with best supportive care (BSC) in individuals with biallelic RPE65-mediated IRD in the UK.MethodsA Markov model was developed to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for VN compared with BSC, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services. Phase III trial data were used to inform transition probabilities up to year 1, after which the treatment effect was assumed to be maintained for 40 years, followed by a decline in vision. A bespoke elicitation exercise involving clinical experts, patients and carers was conducted to estimate utility values for each model health state.ResultsAt list price, VN is associated with incremental costs of £612,404 and incremental QALYs of 6.4, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £95,072 per QALY gained. Voretigene neparvovec is associated with a significant undiscounted QALY gain (20.5) and is therefore eligible for additional QALY weighting under the NICE HST process; an ICER of up to £205,000 per QALY gained could be considered cost-effective under this framework.ConclusionThe results of the model show VN to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in the UK at list price. The availability of a commercial discount in the UK (as considered in the NICE appraisal) means that in reality the ICER will be even lower. Plain language summary available for this article.
| S-EPMC7089725 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of voretigene neparvovec (VN) compared with standard of care (SoC) for patients with inherited retinal disease (IRD) caused by a biallelic RPE65-mutation. VN is a live, non-replicating adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2). SoC is best supportive care provided to patients with visual impairment. Patients under SoC may experience progressive vision loss leading to complete blindness.MethodsWe adapted a previously published Markov cohort model for IRD. An annual cycle length, life-long time horizon, discount rate of 3% for cost and health outcomes, and Swiss health system perspective were used. Data from a randomised controlled phase III trial of VN versus SoC (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00999609) were used to estimate transitions between health states in the first year, after which VN patients were assumed to remain for 39 subsequent years in the health state they were in at the end of the first year. After the 40th year for VN patients and 1st year for SoC patients, visual decline was modelled based on observational data on the natural progression of the disease. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated based on an external study which elicited clinicians' EQ-5D-5L-based utility estimates for IRD patients with a RPE65-mutation. Costs (Swiss Francs (CHF), year 2018-2019) included drug acquisition/ administration, adverse events, testing for sufficient viable retinal cells, and healthcare-related costs of blindness. Societal costs of blindness were added in a complementary analysis. Robustness of the model results were tested in sensitivity and scenario analyses.ResultsFor the base-case, VN resulted in incremental costs per patient of CHF 764'402 (VN: CHF 901'654, SoC: CHF 137'252), incremental blindness-free years of 7.67 (VN: 28.32, SoC: 20.65) and incremental QALYs of 6.73 (VN: 18.35, SoC: 11.62), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 113'526 per QALY gained. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the cost-effectiveness of VN was better than CHF 100,000 per QALY gained in 41% of iterations. For the scenario analysis in which a societal perspective was adopted and for which a 50% work-related productivity loss from blindness was assumed, incremental costs of CHF 423,837 and an ICER of CHF 62'947 per QALY gained were produced. The scenario assuming VN treatment effect lasts for 20 years produced an ICER of CHF 156'171 per QALY gained, whereas assuming a life-long VN treatment effect resulted in an ICER of CHF 96'384 per QALY gained.ConclusionThe incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of VN compared to the SoC was estimated to be CHF 113'526 and CHF 62'947 per QALY gained, respectively, from a Swiss healthcare system, and societal perspective assuming a 50% productivity loss.
| S-EPMC9241179 | biostudies-literature