Dataset Information

Surgical efficacy and survival prediction of patients with unspecified malignant bone tumors.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The surgical efficacy and prognostic outcomes of patients with unspecific malignant bone tumors (UMBTs) remain unclear. The study is to address: 1) What are the clinicopathological features and prognostic determinants for patients with UMBTs? 2) Can a nomogram be developed for clinicians to predict the short and long-term outcomes for individuals with UMBTs? 3) Does surgery improve outcomes for UMBT patients who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy after balancing the confounding bias?

Methods

400 UMBT patients were filtrated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to assess the clinicopathological features, treatments, and factors affecting prognosis. The optimal cutoff values of continuous variables were identified by the x-tile software. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling were performed to evaluate the independent prognostic factors. Nomogram was further developed by using R software with rms package. The surgical efficacy was further assessed for patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy after performing propensity score matching.

Results

The enrolled cohort included 195 (48.8%) female and 205 (51.2%) male patients. The 2- and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rate were 58.2 ± 3.0%, 46.8 ± 3.2%, and 46.5 ± 2.6%, 34.4 ± 2.5%, respectively. Nomogram was finally developed for CSS and OS according to the identified independent factors: age, tumor extent, primary tumor surgery, tumor size, and pathology grade. For UMBT patients who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy, surgical intervention was associated with better CSS (pr = 0.003, pc = 0.002) and OS (pr = 0.035, pc = 0.002), respectively.

Conclusions

Nomogram was developed for individual UMBT patient to predict short and long-term CSS and OS rate, and more external patient cohorts are warranted for validation. Surgery improves outcomes for UMBT patients who received either radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

SUBMITTER: He S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9583561 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Surgical efficacy and survival prediction of patients with unspecified malignant bone tumors.

He Shaohui S Jiang Runyi R Sun Haitao H Yang Jian J Ye Chen C Liu Weibo W Yang Xinghai X Cai Xiaopan X Xiao Jianru J

BMC cancer 20221020 1

<h4>Background</h4>The surgical efficacy and prognostic outcomes of patients with unspecific malignant bone tumors (UMBTs) remain unclear. The study is to address: 1) What are the clinicopathological features and prognostic determinants for patients with UMBTs? 2) Can a nomogram be developed for clinicians to predict the short and long-term outcomes for individuals with UMBTs? 3) Does surgery improve outcomes for UMBT patients who received radiotherapy or chemotherapy after balancing the confoun ...[more]

PMID: 36266614

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMelanoma is defined as a highly mutational heterogeneous disease containing numerous alternations of the molecule. However, due to the phenotypically and genetically heterogeneity of malignant melanoma, conventional clinical characteristics remain restricted or limited in the ability to accurately predict individual outcomes and survival. This study aimed to establish an accurate gene expression signature to predict melanoma prognosis.MethodsIn this study, we established an RNA sequencing-based 12-gene signature data of melanoma patients obtained from 2 independent databases: the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We evaluated the quality of each gene to predict survival conditions in each database by employing univariate and multivariate regression models. A prognostic risk score based on a prognostic signature was determined. This prognostic gene signature further classified patients into low-risk and high-risk groups.ResultsBased on a prognostic signature, a prognostic risk score was determined. This prognostic gene signature further divided the patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. In the chemotherapy and radiotherapy groups of the TCGA cohort and V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) expression group in the GEO cohort, patients in the low-risk group had a longer survival duration compared to patients in the high-risk group. Nevertheless, the immunotherapy group in the TCGA database and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) expression group in the GEO database had no significant differences in statistics. Moreover, this gene signature was associated with patient prognosis regardless of whether the Breslow depth was greater than or less than 3.75 mm. Stratified gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that certain immune-related pathways, such as the T-cell signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, and primary immunodeficiency, were significantly enriched in the low-risk group of both TCGA and GEO cohorts. This information implied the immune-related properties of the 12-gene signature.ConclusionsOur study emphasizes the significance of the gene expression signature in that it may be an indispensable prognostic predictor in melanoma and has great potential for application in personalized treatment.

Project description:ObjectivesThe role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains controversial and the eighth edition TNM staging scheme for MPM has not been fully verified. We aimed to develop an individualized prediction model for identifying optimal candidates for PORT among MPM patients who received surgery plus chemotherapy and externally validate the performance of the new TNM staging scheme.Materials and methodsDetailed characteristics of MPM patients during 2004-2015 were retrieved from SEER registries. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to reduce disparities of baseline characteristics (age, sex, histologic type, stage, and type of surgery) between the PORT group and no-PORT group. A novel nomogram was constructed based on independent prognosticators identified by multivariate Cox regression model. The discriminatory performance and degree of calibration were evaluated. We stratified patients into different risk groups according to nomogram total scores and estimated the survival benefit of PORT in different subgroups in order to identify the optimal candidates.ResultsWe identified 596 MPM patients, among which 190 patients (31.9%) received PORT. PORT conferred significant survival benefit in the unmatched population, while there was no significant survival difference favoring PORT in the matched population. The C-index of the new TNM staging scheme was closed to 0.5, which represented a poor discriminatory ability. A novel nomogram was constructed based on clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, histology, and N stage. We stratified patients into three risk groups. Subgroup analyses indicated that PORT was beneficial for high-risk group (p = 0.003) rather than low-risk group (p = 0.965) and intermediate-risk group (p = 0.661).ConclusionWe established a novel predictive model, which could make individualized prediction of survival benefit of PORT for MPM and could compensate for weakness in TNM staging system.

Project description:BackgroundEvidence-based guidelines recommend management strategies for malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) based on life expectancy. Existent risk-prediction rules do not provide precise individualized survival estimates.Research questionCan a newly developed continuous risk-prediction survival model for patients with MPE and known metastatic disease provide precise survival estimates?Study design and methodsSingle-center retrospective cohort study of patients with proven malignancy, pleural effusion, and known metastatic disease undergoing thoracentesis from 2014 through 2017. The outcome was time from thoracentesis to death. Risk factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. Effect-measure modification (EMM) was tested using the Mantel-Cox test and was addressed by using disease-specific models (DSMs) or interaction terms. Three DSMs and a combined model using interactions were generated. Discrimination was evaluated using Harrell's C-statistic. Calibration was assessed by observed-minus-predicted probability graphs at specific time points. Models were validated using patients treated from 2010 through 2013. Using LENT (pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tumor type) variables, we generated both discrete (LENT-D) and continuous (LENT-C) models, assessing discrete vs continuous predictors' performances.ResultsThe development and validation cohort included 562 and 727 patients, respectively. The Mantel-Cox test demonstrated interactions between cancer type and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (P < .0001), pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (P = .029), and bilateral effusion (P = .002). DSMs for lung, breast, and hematologic malignancies showed C-statistics of 0.72, 0.72, and 0.62, respectively; the combined model's C-statistics was 0.67. LENT-D (C-statistic, 0.60) and LENT-C (C-statistic, 0.65) models underperformed.InterpretationEMM is present between cancer type and other predictors; thus, DSMs outperformed the models that failed to account for this. Discrete risk-prediction models lacked enough precision to be useful for individual-level predictions.

Project description:ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of the hospital glycemic management system with information integration in patients with malignant tumors and hyperglycemia.MethodsThree hundred ninety-three patients diagnosed with malignant tumors with hyperglycemia and hospitalized in the non-endocrinology department of a specialized cancer hospital from March 2019 to November 2020 were recruited. All the patients were diagnosed and treated according to the clinical department and disease course. In total, 196 patients were divided into the control group, who received the conventional blood glucose management mode, and 197 patients were divided into the intervention group, who received the hospital glycemic management system with information integration. The average daily glucose levels were recorded before and after breakfast, lunch, and dinner, at bedtime and at night. The average glucose level, glucose compliance rate, hypoglycemia rate, hyperglycemia rate, glucose measurements per day, average number of hospitalization days and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups.ResultsIn the intervention group, the average glucose level was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia rates in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The glucose compliance rate in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The highest blood glucose level in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the lowest blood glucose level was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The glucose measurements per day in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the average number of hospitalization days in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Patient satisfaction in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionThe hospital glycemic management system with information integration significantly improved the glycemic management of patients with malignant non-endocrine tumors and hyperglycemia, including their glucose level and glucose compliance rate, as well as patient satisfaction, and reduced the average number of hospitalization days and risk of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia.

Project description:Objective: Recently, performing locoregional surgical treatment still remains debatable in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Current study aimed to develop prognostic nomograms for predicting the long-term survival in MBC patients with or without surgical intervention, thereby assisting clinicians in making individualized choice. Methods: The training set included 5173 patients who were diagnosed with MBC in 2010-2013 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, while the validation set comprised 2924 patients diagnosed in 2014-2015. Multivariant Cox hazard model was applied to determine the independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). Then, individualized pre- and postoperative nomograms for predicting 1- or 3-year survival probabilities were constructed accordingly. Internal and external validations were conducted to determine the accuracy of these nomograms by calculating concordance index (C-index) and plotting calibration curves. Results: The survival analysis indicated that surgical management conferred improved OS and BCSS in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Age, T stage, grade, distant metastatic site, ER, PR and HER2 status, radiation, and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for OS and BCSS both in surgery and non-surgery group. All these factors were subsequently incorporated into the nomogram which showed acceptable predictive capabilities with C-index range of 0.65-0.80 both in training set and external validation set. In addition, a preoperative nomogram incorporating variables capable of being determined before surgery was also built with C-index above 0.70 both in training and validation set. Conclusion: Surgical management in patients with metastatic breast cancer suggests a potential survival advantage. In addition, these well-validated pre- and postoperative nomograms may provide a useful tool to assist clinicians in treatment decision-making and in evaluating patients' long term prognosis.

Dataset Information

Surgical efficacy and survival prediction of patients with unspecified malignant bone tumors.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Surgical efficacy and survival prediction of patients with unspecified malignant bone tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets