Dataset Information

Cognitive Limitations Among Middle Eastern and North African Immigrants.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To estimate and compare the prevalence of cognitive limitations among Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) immigrants compared to US- and foreign-born non-Hispanic Whites from Europe (including Russia/former USSR) and examine differences after controlling for risk factors.

Methods

Cross-sectional data using linked 2000-2017 National Health Interview Survey and 2001-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (ages >=65 years, n = 24,827) were analyzed.

Results

The prevalence of cognitive limitations was 17.3% among MENA immigrants compared to 9.6% and 13.6% among US- and foreign-born non-Hispanic Whites from Europe. MENA immigrants had higher odds (OR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.06-3.34) of reporting a cognitive limitation than US-born non-Hispanic Whites after controlling for age, sex, education, hearing loss, hypertension, depression, social isolation, and diabetes.

Discussion

To further examine cognitive health among the MENA aging population, policy changes are needed to identify this group that is often absent from research because of their federal classification as non-Hispanic Whites.

SUBMITTER: Kindratt TB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9633450 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cognitive Limitations Among Middle Eastern and North African Immigrants.

Kindratt Tiffany B TB Dallo Florence J FJ Zahodne Laura B LB Ajrouch Kristine J KJ

Journal of aging and health 20220523 9-10

<h4>Objectives</h4>To estimate and compare the prevalence of cognitive limitations among Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) immigrants compared to US- and foreign-born non-Hispanic Whites from Europe (including Russia/former USSR) and examine differences after controlling for risk factors.<h4>Methods</h4>Cross-sectional data using linked 2000-2017 National Health Interview Survey and 2001-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (ages >=65 years, <i>n</i> = 24,827) were analyzed.<h4>Resul ...[more]

PMID: 35606926

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesModifiable risk factors across the life course play a role in the development of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Studies have identified racial and ethnic disparities in ADRD risk factors. Few studies have explored the epidemiology of ADRD risk among Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) Americans, largely due to their classification as White in US national health surveys. Our aim was to estimate ADRD risk factors among MENA immigrants compared to US- and foreign-born non-Hispanic White adults.Research design and methodsWe linked cross-sectional 2000-2017 National Health Interview Survey and 2001-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (N = 108 695; age ≥ 18 years). Modifiable risk factors for ADRD that were evaluated (yes or no) included less than ninth grade education, hearing loss, traumatic brain injury, hypertension, alcohol use, obesity, smoking, depressive symptoms, marital status, physical inactivity, and diabetes. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were conducted. Regression models were adjusted by age and sex.ResultsCompared to US-born White adults, MENA immigrants had higher odds of reporting less than 9th grade education (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.17-3.21) and psychological health concerns (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.06-1.56). Compared to foreign-born White adults, MENA immigrants had higher odds of diabetes (OR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.06-2.08) and psychological health concerns (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.01-1.54).Discussion and implicationsThe findings provide the first comprehensive look at potentially modifiable risk factors for ADRD among MENA immigrants based on a life course model. Without a racial/ethnic identifier for MENA individuals on a national level, ADRD risk factors among US-born MENA adults and MENA immigrants cannot be examined. More research is needed to explore these risk factors by life stage (early, midlife, and late) to further determine ADRD risk and prevention strategies for MENA Americans.

Project description:ImportancePublic awareness of oral cancer is crucial for prevention, early detection, and improved survival rates. Knowledge gaps in Middle Eastern and North African countries and areas for public education need to be assessed.ObjectiveTo evaluate public knowledge and awareness of oral cancer, including risk factors, signs and symptoms, and protective measures, in Middle Eastern and North African countries.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted using an open, web-based questionnaire from January to December 2022 across 13 Middle Eastern and North African countries (Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Sudan, Morocco, Algeria, Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Oman). Participants were recruited from the general adult population via social media platforms.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes included knowledge of risk factors, signs and symptoms, and protective measures. Factors associated with good knowledge were evaluated based on age, sex, education level, country income level, smoking status, smokeless tobacco use, and exposure to dental education on oral cancer.ResultsAmong 4197 participants (2243 aged 18-30 years [53.4%]; 2372 female [56.5%] and 1825 male [43.5%]), 1559 participants (37.2%) demonstrated good knowledge of oral cancer risk factors, 2028 participants (48.4%) were aware of its signs and symptoms, and 2478 participants (59.1%) recognized associated protective measures. Factors associated with good knowledge across all domains included university education (eg, risk factor knowledge: odds ratio [OR] vs ≤intermediate school, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.20-1.92), no tobacco use (eg, risk factor knowledge: OR for never smoking, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.20-1.74), and receiving education from a dentist (eg, risk factor knowledge: OR, 8.60; 95% CI, 7.33-10.08) at the P < .05 significance threshold. Being female (eg, 1491 females [62.9%] vs 987 males [54.1%] with good knowledge) and residing in upper-middle- or high- vs low- and lower-middle-income countries (eg, 1230 of 1891 participants [65.1%] vs 1248 of 2306 participants [54.2%] with good knowledge) were also associated with increased awareness of protective measures at the P < .00036 significance threshold with Bonferroni adjustment.Conclusions and relevanceThis study found a significant lack of oral cancer awareness in Middle Eastern and North African populations, particularly among individuals with lower levels of education and those who used tobacco. Findings also underscore the critical role of dental professionals in improving public knowledge of oral cancer through targeted educational interventions.

Project description:ObjectiveThere is a lack of guidance on common neuropsychological measures among Arabic speakers and individuals who identify as Middle Eastern/North African (MENA) in the United States. This study evaluated measurement and structural invariance of a neuropsychological battery across race/ethnicity (MENA, Black, White) and language (Arabic, English).MethodSix hundred six older adults (128 MENA-English, 74 MENA-Arabic, 207 Black, 197 White) from the Detroit Area Wellness Network were assessed via telephone. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses examined four indicators corresponding to distinct cognitive domains: episodic memory (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease [CERAD] Word List), language (Animal Fluency), attention (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] forward digit span), and working memory (MoCA backward digit span).ResultsMeasurement invariance analyses revealed full scalar invariance across language groups and partial scalar invariance across racial/ethnic groups suggesting a White testing advantage on Animal Fluency; yet this noninvariance did not meet a priori criteria for salient impact. Accounting for measurement noninvariance, structural invariance analyses revealed that MENA participants tested in English demonstrated lower cognitive health than Whites and Blacks, and MENA participants tested in Arabic demonstrated lower cognitive health than all other groups.ConclusionsMeasurement invariance results support the use of a rigorously translated neuropsychological battery to assess global cognitive health across MENA/Black/White and Arabic/English groups. Structural invariance results reveal underrecognized cognitive disparities. Disaggregating MENA older adults from other non-Latinx Whites will advance research on cognitive health equity. Future research should attend to heterogeneity within the MENA population, as the choice to be tested in Arabic versus English may reflect immigrant, educational, and socioeconomic experiences relevant to cognitive aging. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Dataset Information

Cognitive Limitations Among Middle Eastern and North African Immigrants.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Cognitive Limitations Among Middle Eastern and North African Immigrants.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets