Dataset Information

Data collection framework for electronic medical record-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cancer drugs: a nationwide real-world study of the Korean Cancer Study Group.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Electronic medical records (EMRs) have the highest value among real-world data (RWD). The aim of the present study was to propose a data collection framework of EMR-based RWD to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cancer drugs by conducting a nationwide real-world study based on the Korean Cancer Study Group.

Methods

We considered all patients who received ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (RAM/PTX) for gastric cancer and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for breast cancer at relevant institutions in South Korea. Standard operating procedures for systematic data collection were prospectively developed. Investigator reliability was evaluated using the concordance rate between the recommended input value for representative fictional cases and the input value of each investigator. Reliability of collected data was evaluated twice during the study period at three institutions randomly selected using the concordance rate between the previously collected data and data collected by an independent investigator. The reliability results of the investigators and collected data were used for revision of the electronic data capture system and site training.

Results

Between the starting date of medical insurance coverage and December 2018, a total of 1063 patients at 56 institutions in the RAM/PTX cohort and 824 patients at 60 institutions in the T-DM1 cohort were included. Mean investigator reliability in the RAM/PTX and T-DM1 cohorts was 73.5% and 71.9%, respectively. Mean reliability of collected data in the RAM/PTX and T-DM1 cohort was 90.0% for both cohorts in the first analysis and 89.0% and 84.0% in the second analysis, respectively. Mean missing values of the RAM/PTX and T-DM1 cohorts at the time of simulation of fictional cases and final data analysis decreased from 20.7% to 0.46% and from 18.5% to 0.76%, respectively.

Conclusion

This real-world study provides a framework that ensures relevance and reliability of EMR-based RWD for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of cancer drugs.

SUBMITTER: Han HS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9634188 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Data collection framework for electronic medical record-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cancer drugs: a nationwide real-world study of the Korean Cancer Study Group.

Han Hye Sook HS Lee Kyoung Eun KE Suh Young Ju YJ Jee Hee-Jung HJ Kim Bum Jun BJ Kim Hyeong Su HS Lee Keun-Wook KW Ryu Min-Hee MH Baek Sun Kyung SK Park In Hae IH Ahn Hee Kyung HK Jeong Jae Ho JH Kim Min Hwan MH Lee Dae Hyung DH Kim Siheon S Moon Hyemi H Son Serim S Byun Ji-Hye JH Kim Dong Sook DS An Hyonggin H Park Yeon Hee YH Zang Dae Young DY

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 20221102

<h4>Background</h4>Electronic medical records (EMRs) have the highest value among real-world data (RWD). The aim of the present study was to propose a data collection framework of EMR-based RWD to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cancer drugs by conducting a nationwide real-world study based on the Korean Cancer Study Group.<h4>Methods</h4>We considered all patients who received ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (RAM/PTX) for gastric cancer and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for breast cancer a ...[more]

PMID: 36339930

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesWe tried to clarify, by using representative national data in a real-world setting, whether single-pill combinations (SPCs) of antihypertensives actually improve medication adherence.DesignA nationwide population-based study.SettingWe used a 2.2% cohort (n=1 048 061) of the total population (n=46 605 433) that was randomly extracted by National Health Insurance of Korea from 2008 to 2013.ParticipantsWe included patients (n=116 677) who were prescribed with the same antihypertensive drugs for at least 1 year and divided them into groups of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)-only, calcium channel blocker (CCB)-only, multiple-pill combinations (MPCs) and SPCs of ARB/CCB.Primary outcome measuresMedication possession ratio (MPR), a frequently used indirect measurement method of medication adherence.ResultsAdjusted MPR was higher in combination therapy (89.7% in SPC, 87.2% in MPC) than monotherapy (81.6% in ARB, 79.7% in CCB), and MPR of SPC (89.7%, 95% CI 89.3 to 90.0) was higher than MPR of MPC (87.2%, 95% CI 86.7 to 87.7) (p<0.05). In subgroup analysis, adherence of SPC and MPC was 92.3% (95% CI 91.5 to 93.0) vs 88.1% (95% CI 87.1 to 89.0) in those aged 65-74 years and 89.3% (95% CI 88.0 to 90.7) vs 84.8% (95% CI 83.3 to 92.0) in those ≥75 years (p<0.05). According to total pill numbers, adherence of SPC and MPC was 90.9% (CI 89.8 to 92.0) vs 85.3% (95% CI 84.1 to 86.5) in seven to eight pills and 91.2% (95% CI 89.3 to 93.1) vs 82.5% (95% CI 80.6 to 84.4) in nine or more (p<0.05). The adherence difference between SPC and MPC started to increase at five to six pills and at age 50-64 years (p<0.05). When analysed according to elderly status, the adherence difference started to increase at three to four pills in the elderly (≥65 years) and at five to six in the non-elderly group (20-64 years) (p<0.05). These differences all widened further with increasing age and the total medications.ConclusionSPC regimens demonstrated higher adherence than MPC, and this tendency is more pronounced with increasing age and the total number of medications.

Project description:Linkage of medical databases, including insurer claims and electronic health records (EHRs), is increasingly common. However, few studies have investigated the behavior and output of linkage software. To determine how linkage quality is affected by different algorithms, blocking variables, methods for string matching and weight determination, and decision rules, we compared the performance of 4 nonproprietary linkage software packages linking patient identifiers from noninteroperable inpatient and outpatient EHRs. We linked datasets using first and last name, gender, and date of birth (DOB). We evaluated DOB and year of birth (YOB) as blocking variables and used exact and inexact matching methods. We compared the weights assigned to record pairs and evaluated how matching weights corresponded to a gold standard, medical record number. Deduplicated datasets contained 69,523 inpatient and 176,154 outpatient records, respectively. Linkage runs blocking on DOB produced weights ranging in number from 8 for exact matching to 64,273 for inexact matching. Linkage runs blocking on YOB produced 8 to 916,806 weights. Exact matching matched record pairs with identical test characteristics (sensitivity 90.48%, specificity 99.78%) for the highest ranked group, but algorithms differentially prioritized certain variables. Inexact matching behaved more variably, leading to dramatic differences in sensitivity (range 0.04-93.36%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (range 86.67-97.35%), even for the most highly ranked record pairs. Blocking on DOB led to higher PPV of highly ranked record pairs. An ensemble approach based on averaging scaled matching weights led to modestly improved accuracy. In summary, we found few differences in the rankings of record pairs with the highest matching weights across 4 linkage packages. Performance was more consistent for exact string matching than for inexact string matching. Most methods and software packages performed similarly when comparing matching accuracy with the gold standard. In some settings, an ensemble matching approach may outperform individual linkage algorithms.

Project description:BackgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) test in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can help physicians provide target therapies for patients harboring ALK gene rearrangement. This study aimed to investigate the real-world test patterns and positive rates of ALK gene rearrangements in advanced NSCLC.MethodsIn this real-world study (ChiCTR2000030266), patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent an ALK rearrangement test in 30 medical centers in China between October 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Interpretation training was conducted before the study was initiated. Quality controls were performed at participating centers using immunohistochemistry (IHC)-VENTANA-D5F3. The positive ALK gene rearrangement rate and consistency rate were calculated. The associated clinicopathological characteristics of ALK gene rearrangement were investigated as well.ResultsThe overall ALK gene rearrangement rate was 6.7% in 23,689 patients with advanced NSCLC and 8.2% in 17,436 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The quality control analysis of IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 revealed an intra-hospital consistency rate of 98.2% (879/895) and an inter-hospital consistency rate of 99.2% (646/651). IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 was used in 53.6%, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 25.4%, next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 18.3%, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) in 15.9% in the adenocarcinoma subgroup. For specimens tested with multiple methods, the consistency rates confirmed by IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 were 98.0% (822/839) for FISH, 98.7% (1,222/1,238) for NGS, and 91.3% (146/160) for RT-PCR. The overall ALK gene rearrangement rates were higher in females, patients of ≤ 35 years old, never smokers, tumor cellularity of > 50, and metastatic specimens used for testing in the total NSCLC population and adenocarcinoma subgroup (all P < 0.05).ConclusionsThis study highlights the real-world variability and challenges of ALK test in advanced NSCLC, demonstrating a predominant use of IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 with high consistency and distinct clinicopathological features in ALK-positive patients. These findings underscore the need for a consensus on optimal test practices and support the development of refined ALK test strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic decision-making in NSCLC.

Project description:BackgroundSevere lung cancer is a novel concept that describes a patient with poor performance status (PS; 2-4) but with a high probability of receiving survival benefit and improvement in the PS score. However, there is currently no relevant research or real-world data on those with severe lung cancer, such as incidence, cause, clinical features, and risk factors.MethodsThe data from patients with advanced lung cancer attending multiple centers from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022, were collected for a cross-sectional study. In addition, data from fatal cases from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2022, were retrospectively collected as another cohort. And we developed a questionnaire to assess clinicians' mastery of severe lung cancer.ResultsThree participating institutes enrolled the data set of 1,725 patients, and the dataset of 269 fatal cases were included in another cohort; the incidence of severe lung cancer was 13.10% and 37.55%, respectively. Severe lung cancer patients were mainly stage IV elderly male patients without gene mutation and a history of resection. And the proportion of smoking and comorbidities in severe lung cancer patients is more than in non-severe lung cancer patients (50.4% vs. 40.8%, P=0.006; 46.9% vs. 36.4%, P=0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (46.0%) accounted for the largest proportion of the primary causes of severe lung cancer in the cross-sectional study, while cancer-related symptoms (54.5%) accounted for the largest proportion of the primary causes of sever lung cancer in the 101 fatal cases. For the fatal cases, the overall survival of severe lung cancer patients caused by cancer-related symptoms was longer than that caused by treatment-related AEs (8 vs. 3 months; P=0.019). A total of 616 clinicians completed the questionnaire; 90.26% of clinicians agreed with the concept of severe lung cancer.ConclusionsThe incidence of severe lung cancer cannot be ignored based on real-world data. Treatment-related AEs are gradually account for more of the causes of severe lung cancer, surpassing cancer-related symptoms and comorbidities. Furthermore, the prognosis of patients with advanced lung cancer who develop severe lung cancer due to treatment-related AEs is worse than cancer-related symptoms.

Dataset Information

Data collection framework for electronic medical record-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cancer drugs: a nationwide real-world study of the Korean Cancer Study Group.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Data collection framework for electronic medical record-based real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cancer drugs: a nationwide real-world study of the Korean Cancer Study Group.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets