Efficacy of Dupilumab for Controlling Severe Atopic Dermatitis in a Patient with Hyper-IgE Syndrome.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Levy R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9642001 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Efficacy of Dupilumab for Controlling Severe Atopic Dermatitis in a Patient with Hyper-IgE Syndrome.
Lévy Romain R Béziat Vivien V Barbieux Claire C Puel Anne A Bourrat Emmanuelle E Casanova Jean-Laurent JL Hovnanian Alain A
Journal of clinical immunology 20200128 2
Similar Datasets
Project description:We report the cases of two adolescent siblings with severe atopic dermatitis, who, despite weighing approximately 40kg, presented a good response to dupilumab with the off-label dose for individuals aged 12 years and weighing 60kg. Both had already used cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate and oral corticosteroids for long periods, plus topical treatments with no adequate disease control. Skin lesions were constant and widespread, with frequent skin infections and very poor quality of life, with numerous physical and psychosocial consequences, such as dropping out of school activities due to severe itching, appearance and bullying. They also showed delayed growth and development. In 2018, dupilumab, an immunobiological agent, was approved for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults and, in 2019, extended to the 12-17-year age group. Although it had already been approved by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency, the 200mg presentation (indicated for the weight of patients) was not available, with no expected arrival date. Therefore, weighing the risks and benefits of the situation of both, we chose to treat them with an adult dose (loading dose of 600mg subcutaneously, and 300mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks) despite the low weight. So far, they have received eight injections, showing significant improvement of disease and quality of life. There were no major adverse effects, only worsening of allergic conjunctivitis in one of them. The patients and their family are very satisfied, and we believe that the therapy has been successful.
| S-EPMC8081439 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We report 10 cases of conjunctivitis in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab from November 2017 to November 2018 in our institution, who were referred to the ophthalmology department for diagnosis and management of conjunctivitis. We also describe ocular surface findings in these patients before the first injection of dupilumab. During the first 6 months post initiation of dupilumab, incidence of conjunctivitis was 27% (5/18) in patients treated from November 2017 to April 2018 who had not had ocular examination previously. This rate dropped to 12% (3/25) after systematic ophthalmological referral before initiation of dupilumab. Patients who developed conjunctivitis had mean SCORAD score (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) of 60.4 ± 20 (35-88) and mean EASI score (Eczema Area and Severity Index) of 37 ± 17 (14.6-56). Mean age was 36 years (20-51). Most patients had a long history of AD (> 10 years). Mean delay of ocular surface inflammation was 3.5 months, ranging from 1 to 8 months. One patient had to discontinue dupilumab because of severe follicular conjunctivitis. We observed two clinical patterns of ocular surface diseases: a mild non-specific conjunctivitis with dry eyes, which improved with warm compresses and artificial tears without any recurrence; and a severe dupilumab-induced follicular conjunctivitis without keratitis, which required specific ophthalmological management.
| S-EPMC6692787 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The pharmacokinetics (PKs) and exposure-efficacy of dupilumab have not been fully described for adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). Our objectives were to analyze the PKs and exposure-efficacy of dupilumab in adults with AD and compare the results of Japanese and overall populations. Adults with moderate-to-severe AD were randomly assigned to dupilumab (300 mg weekly [qw] or every 2 weeks [q2w], 200 mg q2w, 300 mg every 4 weeks [q4w], or 100 mg q4w) or placebo for 16 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase IIb trial (NCT01859988). This analysis included 379 patients (58 Japanese). Functional dupilumab concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner; at lower concentrations, increases were greater than dose-proportional because of nonlinear, target-mediated clearance. Dupilumab pharmacokinetics were comparable in Japanese and non-Japanese patients with similar body weights. Week 16 efficacy parameters, including Investigator's Global Assessment score 0/1, greater than or equal to 75% reduction from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and percentage change from baseline in EASI and pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, generally increased with week 16 trough concentration; the plateau of these exposure-efficacy relationships occurred for most patients at exposures associated with the 300 mg q2w and 300 mg qw regimens. Japanese ethnicity did not remain in the population PK model as covariate with or without accounting for body weight differences. In Japanese and non-Japanese patients, efficacy responses increased with week 16 dupilumab trough concentrations in a similar manner. Dupilumab 300 mg qw and q2w regimens were recommended for further evaluation in larger phase III studies.
| S-EPMC9579381 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease with an unmet need for treatments that provide rapid and high levels of skin clearance and itch improvement.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib vs dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.Design, setting, and participantsHeads Up was a 24-week, head-to-head, phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-controlled clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib with dupilumab among 692 adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were candidates for systemic therapy. The study was conducted from February 21, 2019, to December 9, 2020, at 129 centers located in 22 countries across Europe, North and South America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region. Efficacy analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat population.InterventionsPatients were randomized 1:1 and treated with oral upadacitinib, 30 mg once daily, or subcutaneous dupilumab, 300 mg every other week.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was achievement of 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at week 16. Secondary end points were percentage change from baseline in the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (weekly average), proportion of patients achieving EASI100 and EASI90 at week 16, percentage change from baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at week 4, proportion of patients achieving EASI75 at week 2, percentage change from baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) at week 1, and Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) improvement of 4 points or more at week 16. End points at week 24 included EASI75, EASI90, EASI100, and improvement of 4 points or more in Worst Pruritus NRS from baseline (weekly average). Safety was assessed as treatment-emergent adverse events in all patients receiving 1 or more dose of either drug.ResultsOf 924 patients screened, 348 (183 men [52.6%]; mean [SD] age, 36.6 [14.6] years) were randomized to receive upadacitinib and 344 were randomized to receive dupilumab (194 men [56.4%]; mean [SD] age, 36.9 [14.1] years); demographic and disease characteristics were balanced among treatment groups. At week 16, 247 patients receiving upadacitinib (71.0%) and 210 patients receiving dupilumab (61.1%) achieved EASI75 (P = .006). All ranked secondary end points also demonstrated the superiority of upadacitinib vs dupilumab, including improvement in Worst Pruritus NRS as early as week 1 (mean [SE], 31.4% [1.7%] vs 8.8% [1.8%]; P < .001), achievement of EASI75 as early as week 2 (152 [43.7%] vs 60 [17.4%]; P < .001), and achievement of EASI100 at week 16 (97 [27.9%] vs 26 [7.6%]; P < .001). Rates of serious infection, eczema herpeticum, herpes zoster, and laboratory-related adverse events were higher for patients who received upadacitinib, whereas rates of conjunctivitis and injection-site reactions were higher for patients who received dupilumab.Conclusions and relevanceDuring 16 weeks of treatment, upadacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy vs dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, with no new safety signals.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03738397.
| S-EPMC8340015 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDupilumab, targeting the interleukin-4α receptor and inhibiting the action of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, was recently approved for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. There is limited data on long-term effects and safety among patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab. Weight gain was observed among patients treated with dupilumab in our clinic. The aim was to describe weight change in a cohort study of patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab from baseline to follow-up after 12 months, and to analyze if weight change was associated with effect of treatment, reported appetite, and/or disturbed night sleep due to itching.MethodsAll patients with atopic dermatitis receiving systemic treatment at the Unit of Dermatology, Karolinska University Hospital, have been registered and monitored consecutively since January 2017. This cohort constituted all patients who started treatment on dupilumab or methotrexate between 10 January 2017 and 30 June 2019 with at least 6 months of follow-up within the study period. The following variables were monitored at start of and during treatment: Eczema Severity Score Index, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, visual analogue scale for pruritus 10 cm, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and weight. Data analyses were performed using two-sample Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney rank-sum test, or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign-rank test with a p-value < 0.05 considered as statistically significant.ResultsPatients treated with dupilumab (n = 12) gained weight (mean 6.1 kg, range [0.1-18.0], p = 0.002) after 1 year on treatment. The majority of patients showed a good response to treatment with dupilumab (n = 11); at follow-up at 6, 9, or 12 months, they reached EASI-90 (n = 6), EASI-75 (n = 4), or EASI-50 (n = 1). There was no significant association between weight gain and treatment response, reported appetite, or disturbed night-sleep due to itch. Patients treated with methotrexate showed no significant weight change (n = 8).ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first report on a possible association between weight gain and dupilumab treatment; the extent of the association is yet to be seen, as is the mechanism behind this finding.
| S-EPMC7510313 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To determine phenotype-related dupilumab response in adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), this multicenter, retrospective study included 111 adults with moderate-to-severe AD in Taiwan, with median age of 31.5 years (18-87) and 71 (64.0%) males. Patients received dupilumab 300 mg per two to three weeks up to 12 months. We found a significant improvement after 4 and 16 weeks of treatment in all patients for all the assessed scores, including eczema area and severity index (EASI) improvement ≥50% (EASI-50) and 75% (EASI-75), EASI reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) improvement ≥2. Importantly, prior to asthma, early AD onset and 3-week drug intervals were significantly associated with a high proportion of EASI-75 at month 12, while prurigo and lichenoid phenotypes were associated with a lower proportion of EASI-75 at month 12. However, the majority of adverse events were mild in severity. In conclusion, our study results identify phenotype-related dupilumab response at month 12 in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, and we suggest that treatment should not be discontinued until reaching a satisfactory clinical response.
| S-EPMC9605350 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceAdolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD) have high disease burden negatively affecting quality of life, with limited treatment options. The efficacy and safety of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody, approved for treatment in adolescent patients with inadequately controlled AD, remain unknown in this patient population.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab monotherapy in adolescents with moderate to severe inadequately controlled AD.Design, setting, and participantsA randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial was conducted at 45 US and Canadian centers between March 21, 2017, and June 5, 2018. A total of 251 adolescents with moderate to severe AD inadequately controlled by topical medications or for whom topical therapy was inadvisable were included.InterventionsPatients were randomized (1:1:1; interactive-response system; stratified by severity and body weight) to 16-week treatment with dupilumab, 200 mg (n = 43; baseline weight <60 kg), or dupilumab, 300 mg (n = 39; baseline weight ≥60 kg), every 2 weeks; dupilumab, 300 mg, every 4 weeks (n = 84); or placebo (n = 85).Main outcomes and measuresProportion of patients with 75% or more improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) (scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0 or 1 on a 5-point scale (scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater severity) at week 16.ResultsA total of 251 patients were randomized (mean [SD] age, 14.5 [1.7] years; 148 [59.0%] male). Of 250 patients with data available on concurrent allergic conditions, most had comorbid type 2 diseases (asthma, 134 [53.6%]; food allergies, 60.8%; allergic rhinitis, 65.6%). A total of 240 patients (95.6%) completed the study. Dupilumab achieved both coprimary end points at week 16. The proportion of patients with EASI-75 improvement from baseline increased (every 2 weeks, 41.5%; every 4 weeks, 38.1%; placebo, 8.2%) with differences vs placebo of 33.2% (95% CI, 21.1%-45.4%) for every 2 weeks and 29.9% (95% CI, 17.9%-41.8%) for every 4 weeks (P < .001). Efficacy of the every-2-week regimen was generally superior to the every-4-week regimen. Patients in the dupilumab arms had higher percentage values of conjunctivitis (every 2 weeks, 9.8%; every 4 weeks, 10.8%; placebo, 4.7%) and injection-site reactions (every 2 weeks, 8.5%; every 4 weeks, 6.0%; placebo, 3.5%), and lower nonherpetic skin infections (every 2 weeks, 9.8%; every 4 weeks, 9.6%; placebo, 18.8%).Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life in adolescents with moderate to severe AD, with an acceptable safety profile. Placebo-corrected efficacy and safety of dupilumab were similar in adolescents and adults.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03054428.
| S-EPMC6865265 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor unit for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13. International phase II and III studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), but the effects of dupilumab in Japanese patients have not been reported.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD.MethodsWe analysed the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the Japanese cohorts of a 16-week, phase IIb dose-finding trial (AD-1021; NCT01859988); a 16-week, phase III, placebo-controlled monotherapy trial (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1; NCT02277743) and a 52-week, phase III, placebo-controlled study of dupilumab with topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS; NCT02260986).ResultsTwenty-seven, 106 and 117 Japanese patients were enrolled in AD-1021, SOLO 1 and CHRONOS, respectively. Baseline disease severity was numerically higher in the Japanese cohort than in the overall study population. Generally, dupilumab significantly improved signs and symptoms of AD, including pruritus and patient quality of life, compared with placebo in the Japanese cohort, consistent with the overall study population. The combined safety profile of dupilumab in the Japanese cohort was similar to that in the total study populations; dupilumab was associated with an increased incidence of injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis compared with placebo. Dupilumab was associated with rapid reduction in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and gradual IgE reductions.ConclusionsDupilumab alone or with topical corticosteroids improved signs and symptoms of AD, had an acceptable safety profile, and suppressed biomarkers of type 2 inflammation compared with placebo in Japanese adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. What's already known about this topic? Differences in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathology have been reported between Asian and Western populations, in which distinct helper T-cell activation profiles have been observed. International clinical studies in adults with moderate-to-severe AD have evaluated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab, which blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key molecules in type 2 inflammation. The effects of dupilumab in Japanese patients specifically have not yet been reported. What does this study add? Dupilumab alone or with topical corticosteroids improved signs and symptoms of AD and had an acceptable safety profile compared with placebo in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The effects were comparable with those observed in the overall study population. Reported immunological differences in AD pathology in Asian patients may be secondary to type 2 immune activation.
| S-EPMC7384164 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPrimary results of the JADE DARE trial (NCT04345367) demonstrated that abrocitinib was superior to dupilumab in reducing the signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were responders or nonresponders to dupilumab using various definitions of response.MethodsData included dupilumab-treated patients from JADE DARE who switched to abrocitinib 200 mg when enrolled in the ongoing JADE EXTEND trial (NCT03422822). For this analysis, various response criteria at Week 26 of JADE DARE were defined post hoc based on Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores or responses. Efficacy was analyzed at Week 12 of JADE EXTEND based on patients' fulfillment of the various response criteria at Week 26 of JADE DARE. EASI scores and percentage changes from baseline in EASI and PP-NRS at Week 26 in JADE DARE were compared with the corresponding scores and percentage changes at Week 12 in EXTEND. Safety was assessed.ResultsOf 365 dupilumab-treated patients in JADE DARE, 316 were enrolled in JADE EXTEND and 312 received abrocitinib 200 mg. Most dupilumab responders for IGA, EASI, PP-NRS, and DLQI at DARE Week 26 maintained their responses 12 weeks after switching to abrocitinib, while a considerable proportion of IGA, EASI, PP-NRS, or DLQI dupilumab nonresponders gained response after switching to abrocitinib. Lower EASI scores and greater percentage changes from baseline in EASI and PP-NRS scores were observed with abrocitinib at EXTEND Week 12 than with dupilumab at DARE Week 26. No new safety signals were observed.ConclusionAbrocitinib 200 mg may be an effective treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe AD who do not achieve an optimal response with dupilumab treatment.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT04345367 (JADE DARE) and NCT03422822 (JADE EXTEND).
| S-EPMC11833030 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic eczematous skin disease with severe pruritus. Several new therapeutic agents for AD such as dupilumab, an anti-IL-4Rα antibody, have been developed in recent years. We need to predict which agent is the best choice for each patient, but this remains difficult.ObjectiveOur aim was to examine clinical background factors and baseline biomarkers that could predict the achievement of improved clinical outcomes in patients with AD treated with dupilumab.MethodsA multicenter, prospective observational study was conducted on 110 patients with AD. The Eczema Area and Severity Index was used as an objective assessment, and the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure and Numerical Rating Scale for Pruritus were used as patient-reported outcomes. In addition, some clinical background factors were evaluated.ResultsThe achievement of an absolute Eczema Area and Severity Index of 7 or less was negatively associated with current comorbidity of food allergy and baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. There were negative associations between achievement of a Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score of 7 or less and duration of severe AD and between achievement of an itching Numerical Rating Scale for Pruritus score of 1 or less and current comorbidity of allergic conjunctivitis or baseline serum periostin level. Furthermore, signal detection analysis showed that a baseline serum LDH level less than 328 U/L could potentially be used as a cutoff value for predicting the efficacy of dupilumab.ConclusionBaseline biomarkers such as LDH and periostin and clinical background factors such as current comorbidity of food allergy and a long period of severe disease may be useful indicators when choosing dupilumab for systemic treatment for AD, as they can predict the efficacy of dupilumab.
| S-EPMC11381866 | biostudies-literature