Dataset Information

Advantages of Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block via Subfascial Approach Versus Extrafascial Approach for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We aimed to compare the analgesic effect and incidence of lower limb weakness of transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block via subfascial approach with that via extrafascial after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Eighty patients undergoing LC were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided bilateral TQL block via subfascial (subfascial group) or extrafascial (extrafascial group) using 30 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine unilaterally. Pain scores of port sites while rest and coughing at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours postoperatively as primary outcome were compared. Modified Lovett Rating Scale, ambulatory dependency, and rescue analgesia requirement was also compared.

Results

The pain score of the subxiphoid and of the right subcostal port site for up to the postoperative 36 hours (2 [1 to 2]) and 24 hours (2 [2 to 3]) in the subfascial group was significantly lower than that in extrafascial group (2 [2 to 2] and 3 [2.25 to 4]). Up to postoperative 24 hours, the rescue analgesia requirement in subfascial group was significantly lower than that in extrafascial group, namely less fentanyl consumption and parecoxib (1.3 [±5.5] μg vs. 5.6 [±10.6] μg; 17.5% vs. 37.5%). The ratio of patients with LRS score of 6 at postoperative 1 hour (65.0%), and with dependent ambulation at postoperative 1 and 6 hours in subfascial group (15.0% and 0.0%) was significantly lower than that in extrafascial group (10.0%, 80.0%, and 17.5%).

Conclusion

TQL block via subfascial had the advantages of better analgesic effect and less lower limbs weakness after LC over that via extrafascial.

SUBMITTER: He WQ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9645534 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Advantages of Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block via Subfascial Approach Versus Extrafascial Approach for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

He Wen-Quan WQ Li Yu-Jie YJ Li Yong-Shuai YS Zhang Xu-Hao XH Cao Jian J Lu Kai-Zhi KZ Cheung Chi Wai CW Gu Jian-Teng JT Xia Zheng-Yuan ZY Yi Bin B

The Clinical journal of pain 20221201 12

<h4>Objective</h4>We aimed to compare the analgesic effect and incidence of lower limb weakness of transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block via subfascial approach with that via extrafascial after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).<h4>Methods</h4>Eighty patients undergoing LC were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided bilateral TQL block via subfascial (subfascial group) or extrafascial (extrafascial group) using 30 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine unilaterally. Pain scores of port sites while rest ...[more]

PMID: 36221155

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study objectivePatients undergoing open nephrectomy surgery experience severe perioperative pain, which is primarily due to incision of several muscles. Abdominal wall blocks are known to reduce pain without causing epidural-associated hypotension. We conducted this study to compare unilateral ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block and posterior transversus abdominis block in combination with general anesthesia alone in terms of intraoperative and postoperative analgesics and hemodynamics and postoperative complications.MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial conducted in the operating room. This study included 48 patients aged 20-60 years, with ASA I and II, and a body mass index ≤ 30kg.m-2 who were scheduled for open nephrectomy procedure.The 48 patients scheduled for nephrectomy were randomly allocated into one of the following three groups after induction of general anesthesia: Group A (n=16) received USG transmuscular QLB; Group B (n=16) received unilateral USG posterior transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block; and Group C (n=16; control group) did not receive any blocks. Introperative fentanyl consumption, and hemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP)) were recorded after anesthesia induction, at surgical incision, and every 15min till the end of surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was evaluated immediately at 30min and 1,2,4,6, and 12hours postoperatively. The time of first analgesic request was also recorded.ResultsIntraoperative fentanyl consumption (μg) was significantly lower in Groups A and B (164.69±27.35 and 190.31±44.48, respectively) than in Group C (347.50±63.64) (p<0.001). Postoperatively, total pethidine consumption was significantly lower in Groups A and B than in Group C (85.31±6.68, 84.06±4.17mg, and 152.19±43.43mg, respectively) (p<0.001. Time to rescue analgesia was longer in Groups A and B than in Group C (138.75±52.39min, 202.50±72.25min, and 37.50±13.42min, respectively) (p<0.001). VAS score was significantly lower in Groups A and B than in Group C at 30min and 1, 2, 4, and 6hours postoperatively.ConclusionTransmuscular quadratus lumborum block and posterior transversus abdominis blocks were effective in providing perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing open nephrectomy. However, quadratus lumborum block provided superior analgesia.

Project description:BackgroundThoracic epidural anesthesia is no longer considered the gold standard for perioperative analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal procedures. In the search for alternatives, the efficacy of the transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block and other abdominal wall blocks such as the transmuscular quadratus lumborum (TQL) block continues to be investigated for postoperative pain management. Most of the initial studies on TAP blocks reported positive effects; however, the amount of studies with negative outcomes is increasing, most probably due to the fact that the majority of abdominal wall blocks fail to mitigate visceral pain. The TQL block could prove attractive in the search for better postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. In several cadaveric studies of the TQL, a spread of dye into the thoracic paravertebral space, the intercostal spaces, and even the thoracic sympathetic trunk was reported. Given the advantage of possibly reaching the thoracic paravertebral space, the potential to reach nerves transmitting visceral pain, and the possible coverage of dermatomes T4-L1, we hypothesize that the TQL provides superior postoperative analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery as compared to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine alone.Methods and designIn this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial, 150 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery will be included. Patients will be randomly allocated to two different analgesic strategies: a bilateral TQL with 30 ml ropivacaine 0.375% each on both sides, administered before induction of anesthesia, plus postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (TQL group, n = 75), or a bilateral TQL block with 30 ml saline each on both sides plus postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (placebo group, n = 75). Our primary outcome parameter will be the morphine consumption during the first 24 h postsurgery. Secondary endpoints include pain intensity as assessed with the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, time to return of intestinal function (defined as the time to first flatus and the time to the first postoperative intake of solid food), time to first mobilization, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting during the first 24 h, length of stay on the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and in the hospital, the extent of sensory block at two time points (admission to and discharge from the PACU), the doses of morphine IV as requested by the patient from the PCA pump, the total dosage of morphine administered IV, the need for and dose of rescue analgesics (ketamine, clonidine), free plasma ropivacaine levels after induction and at discharge from the PACU, and the incidence of adverse events during treatment (in particular, signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)). Epidural analgesia is no longer the standard of care for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Until now, the most effective analgesic strategy in these patients especially in an enhanced recovery program is still unknown. Several abdominal wall blocks (TAP, fascia transversalis plane block) are known to have an analgesic effect only on somatic pain. Recognizing the importance of procedure-specific pain management, we aim to investigate whether a transmuscular quadratus lumborum block delivers superior pain control in comparison to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine alone.Trial registrationEudraCT identifier 2019-002304-40. Registered on 17 September 2019.

Dataset Information

Advantages of Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block via Subfascial Approach Versus Extrafascial Approach for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Advantages of Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block via Subfascial Approach Versus Extrafascial Approach for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets