A mixed methods study on factors that promote and ameliorate burnout in academic dermatologists.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Nelson MN
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9645749 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
A mixed methods study on factors that promote and ameliorate burnout in academic dermatologists.
Nelson Maria N MN Akpek Eda E Margolis David J DJ Barg Frances K FK Vittorio Carmela C CC
Archives of dermatological research 20221109 4
The burnout literature is replete with burnout score results from quantitative surveys. There is a paucity of qualitative research that seeks to understand the impact of physician stressors on work-life balance and burnout. This study aimed to identify factors that support and disrupt work-life balance, drivers of burnout, and potential solutions among academic dermatologists. The objective was to better understand factors that promote wellness and ameliorate burnout. Concurrent explanatory mixe ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThere is conflicting and limited information regarding factors that influence undergraduate nursing students' academic and clinical performance prior to entry to practice.ObjectiveTo identify factors influencing the academic and clinical performance of undergraduate nursing students throughout the course.DesignMixed methods study utilizing a retrospective cohort and a qualitative study.SettingMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.ParticipantsLongitudinal existing data of nursing undergraduate students who commenced in 2017 (n = 176) and 2018 (n = 76), and two focus groups with final year nursing students were analyzed.MethodsRetrospective students' records were used to determine the students' academic and clinical performance using the weighted average mark (WAM) of the theoretical and clinical components of the curriculum, separately. The WAM considered the year level of each unit and was scored out of 100. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine predictor factors of academic and clinical performance. Variables include entry cohort (with no previous nursing qualification vs. diploma of nursing), admission category (domestic vs. international), campus (metropolitan vs. outer metropolitan), and secondary school (year 12) results. Two focus group discussions were conducted and thematically analyzed.ResultsMore than two-thirds of the students were aged 18-20 years and mainly female. Almost 20% of the participants were international students. Students with higher secondary school (year 12) results and studying at the outer metropolitan campus achieved a higher academic performance while international students had significantly lower academic performance compared to domestic students. Students with a previous diploma of enrolled nursing and international students had lower clinical performance. Students identified that a comprehensive orientation, interactive curriculum, formal and informal support structure, and educator qualities influenced their academic and/or clinical performance.ConclusionsA supportive educational environment with an interactive curriculum may enhance students' academic and clinical performance and readiness for practice. Furthermore, targeted interventions for international students, those with lower secondary school (year 12) results, and those with a former diploma of nursing may be required to increase academic and clinical performance.
| S-EPMC8889111 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBurnout among physicians is a consequence of chronic occupational stresses and emotionally intense work demands. However, much of the evidence exploring burnout is derived from urban settings and may not reflect the work and social contexts of physicians in Indigenous communities or in rural and resource-constrained areas. We sought to characterize health system factors that influence burnout among physicians practicing in the three northern territories of Canada.MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study that included an online survey and qualitative interviews with physicians practicing in Nunavut, Northwest Territories, or Yukon in 2019. The survey adapted content from the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Results were analyzed with logistic regression to assess the association between health system factors and burnout. We conducted in-depth interviews with 14 physicians. Qualitative data was coded and analyzed for themes using the ATLAS.ti software.ResultsThirty-nine percent of survey respondents (n = 22/57) showed features associated with burnout. Factors associated with burnout included use of electronic medical records (β = - 0.7, p < .05), inadequate financial remuneration (β = - 1.0, p < .05), and cross-cultural issues (β = - 1.1, p < .05). Qualitative analysis further identified physician perceptions of lack of influence over health system policies, systemic failures in cultural safety, discontinuity of care, administrative burden, and physician turnover as important drivers of burnout.ConclusionsPhysicians practicing in northern regions in Canada experience stress and burnout related to health system factors and cross-cultural issues. The relationship between cross-cultural issues and burnout has not previously been reported. This work may have implications for physician wellbeing and workforce attrition in other resource-constrained or culturally diverse clinical settings.
| S-EPMC8390267 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo measure work-related burnout in all groups of health service staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify factors associated with work-related burnout.DesignCross-sectional staff survey.SettingAll staff grades and types across primary and secondary care in a single National Health Service organisation.Participants257 staff members completed the survey, 251 had a work-related burnout score and 239 records were used in the regression analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Work-related burnout as measured by the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory; (2) factors associated with work-related burnout identified through a multiple linear regression model; and (3) factors associated with work-related burnout identified through thematic analysis of free text responses.ResultsAfter adjusting for other covariates (including age, sex, job, being able to take breaks and COVID-19 knowledge), we observed meaningful changes in work-related burnout associated with having different COVID-19 roles (p=0.03), differences in the ability to rest and recover during breaks (p<0.01) and having personal protective equipment concerns (p=0.04). Thematic analysis of the free text comments also linked burnout to changes in workload and responsibility and to a lack of control through redeployment and working patterns. Reduction in non-COVID-19 services has resulted in some members of staff feeling underutilised, with feelings of inequality in workload.ConclusionsOur analyses support anecdotal reports of staff struggling with the additional pressures brought on by COVID-19. All three of the factors we found to be associated with work-related burnout are modifiable and hence their effects can be mitigated. When we next find ourselves in extraordinary times the ordinary considerations of rest and protection and monitoring of the impact of new roles will be more important than ever.
| S-EPMC7844932 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionHealth provider burnout is highly prevalent (28-51%) in the US and may contribute to a projected national health provider shortage by 2030. The Socioecological Model (SEM) is a proven conceptual framework used to identify influencing factors and design relevant solutions to improve health outcomes across multiple ecological levels. This study applied the SEM to identify modifiable drivers and solutions of burnout across multiple levels among US Military health providers.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional mixed methods study using an online survey (N = 129) and in-depth interviews (N = 25) of active duty military health providers. Our primary quantitative outcome was self-reported definite, unrelenting, or complete burnout. Our quantitative analysis included chi-square tests of association and bootstrapped multivariable logistic regressions to explore SEM-informed correlates of burnout, controlling for contextual variables. Our qualitative data explored providers individual experience with workplace stress and burnout, providing details on factors influencing burnout at the individual, interpersonal, organizational and military levels. The qualitative data was systematically coded and analyzed using grounded theory.ResultsAbout two-thirds (63%) of surveyed providers self-reported burnout. Individual-level factors significantly associated with burnout included a positive coping style (AOR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.08-0.56), perceived control over workload (AOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04-0.66), and satisfaction with the current job (AOR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03-0.39). At the organizational level, providers described as overworked (AOR = 10.58; 95% CI: 3.30-33.91) or in hectic or chaotic primary work areas (AOR = 7.54; 95% CI: 2.33-24.38) had higher rates of burnout. At the military level, providers who were happy with their career path and promotion plan (AOR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06-0.44) reported lower rates of burnout. The organizational level had the highest cumulative impact of modifiable factors on burnout (AOR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.36). Qualitative interviews corroborated survey findings and highlighted the individual level manifestations of burnout, the role of interpersonal support as mitigators of burnout and the complexity of governmental and military policies impacting provider wellness.DiscussionIdentified factors influencing burnout at various levels may inform potential data-driven interventions to ensure a functional and vibrant US Military health. Data-driven strategies may include opportunities to balance work demands with resources and ability to cope as well as improve positive coping skills, attitudes and experiences related to work.
| S-EPMC11609726 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCritical care practitioners have some of the highest levels of burnout in health care.Research questionWhat are key drivers of burnout across the multidisciplinary ICU team?Study design and methodsWe conducted a multicenter mixed-methods cohort study in ICUs at three diverse hospitals. We recruited physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other staff members who worked primarily in an ICU. Participants completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI) and a qualitative focus group or interview using a phenomenologic approach. MBI subscales for emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of personal accomplishment were calculated. Emergent shared themes contributing to burnout were identified from qualitative interviews.ResultsFifty-eight providers (26 physicians, 22 nurses, six respiratory therapists, three pharmacists, and one case manager) participated. Ten participants (17.9%) described their burnout as moderate to high. However, participants scored moderate or high levels across the three MBI subscales (emotional exhaustion, 71.4%; depersonalization, 53.6%; and lack of personal achievement, 53.6%). Drivers of burnout aligned with three core themes: patient factors, team dynamics, and hospital culture. Individual drivers included medically futile cases, difficult families, contagiousness of burnout, lack of respect between team members, the increasing burden of administrative or regulatory requirements at the cost of time with patients, lack of recognition from hospital leadership, and technology. All were highly interconnected across the three larger domains. Despite differences in MBI scores, most provider types described very similar drivers of burnout.InterpretationHigh levels of burnout were identified through the MBI, but participants did not self-report high levels of burnout, suggesting a lack of awareness. Drivers of burnout were highly interconnected, but factors related to team dynamics and hospital culture were most prominent and shared across provider types. The shared drivers of burnout across multiple provider types highlights the need for interventions focused on team- and system-level drivers.
| S-EPMC9131031 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionInvestigating the correlation between quality of life (QoL) and academic resilience (AR) and understanding their influencing factors is crucial for adequately preparing nursing students to navigate the challenges in their future professional careers.ObjectivesThis research aims to investigate the relationship between QoL and AR among nursing students. Additionally, to explore factors influencing these variables from the students' perspectives.MethodsA mixed-methods design, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data, was conducted at a Saudi nursing college. The quantitative data were collected through a cross-sectional design, with a convenience sample of 190 students completing the Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale (BBQ) and the Academic Resilience Scale (ARS-30). Simultaneously, qualitative data were collected using open-ended questions to gain insights into the factors influencing their QoL and AR, as well as the role of nursing education. The analysis involved inferential statistics and content analysis.ResultsThe study revealed that Saudi nursing students reported a moderate level of both QoL and AR. A significant positive correlation indicates that AR explains around 34.0% of the variation in QoL (p < 0.005). The qualitative data identified various supportive and barrier factors impacting the QoL and AR of nursing students, and students reflected on the significant role of nursing educators and academic advising.ConclusionThe findings hold implications for interventions such as establishing supportive educational environments, enhancing academic advising, implementing resilience-building and wellness programs, peer support initiatives, and encouraging social engagement-all essential strategies to bolster nursing students' overall well-being, QoL, and AR.
| S-EPMC11645762 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the current state of academic burnout among Chinese college students and its influencing factors.MethodsA cross-sectional study of 22,983 students was conducted using structured questionnaires and the Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey on sociodemographic characteristics, educational process, and personal aspects. Multiple variables were statistically evaluated using logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe total score of the students' academic burnout was 40.73 (± 10.12) points. The scores for the reduced personal accomplishment, emotional exhaustion, and cynicism were 23.63 (± 6.55), 11.20 (± 6.05), and 5.91 (± 5.31), respectively. Students with academic burnout accounted for 59.9% (13,753/22,983). Male students had higher burnout scores than female students, upper-grade students had higher burnout scores than lower-grade students, and students who smoked had higher burnout than non-smokers during the school day.ConclusionsMore than half of students experienced academic burnout. Gender, grade, monthly living expenses, smoking, parents' education level, study and life pressures, and the current degree of professional knowledge interest significantly impacted academic burnout. An effective wellness program and an annual long-term burnout assessment may sufficiently reduce student burnout.
| S-EPMC10163855 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe career pathway of clinical academics in the UK is challenging. To pursue academic endeavors, trainees often undertake approved time 'Out of Programme for Research' (OOPR), a standalone research fellow post or join an 'Integrated Academic Training' pathway. Time out of training may impact their clinical skills, confidence and competency. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the challenges associated with returning to clinical training after prolonged leave for academic trainees.MethodsStakeholders were clinical academic trainees and supervisors within the Yorkshire and Humber region of England, and training programme academic leads from universities across England. Qualitative data-analyses of verbatim recorded data from three focus groups and 12 individual telephone interviews were conducted within an a priori framework.ResultsReturning to a high-stress environment with a perceived lack of specialty-level advocacy and support, feeling isolated from peers, struggling to balance competing demands, meet clinical and academic expectations and managing clinical deskilling in a trainee's return to clinical training were common experiences described by stakeholders. There was a lack of recognition from academic leads, however, on the impact of such challenges on the trainees' subsequent ability to successfully integrate their clinical and academic careers. Various solutions were identified by stakeholders to overcome such barriers, including a normalised, phased, individualised supported return to work and capacity building for supervisors.ConclusionsThere is an apparent disconnect between the clinical and academic world, with clinical academic trainees stuck between the two, being pulled by each, feeling like they are not quite meeting the expectations of either. Time away from training for trainees on OOPR is often longer than for other reasons for time out of programme (typically 3-4 years if completing a doctoral degree). Given the importance of clinical academics in bridging clinical research and practice, and the concerns recently raised about the rate of attrition of clinician scientists within the NHS, it is of the utmost importance that clinical academic trainees are supported throughout all stages of their careers.
| S-EPMC11827248 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND : Hospitalist physician stress was exacerbated by the pandemic, yet there have been no large scale studies of contributing factors.ObjectiveAssess remediable components of burnout in hospitalists.Participants, study design and measuresIn this Coping with COVID study, we focused on assessment of stress factors among 1022 hospital-based clinicians surveyed between April to December 2020. We assessed variables previously associated with burnout (anxiety/depression due to COVID-19, work overload, fear of exposure or transmission, mission/purpose, childcare stress and feeling valued) on 4 point Likert scales, with results dichotomized with the top two categories meaning "present"; burnout was assessed with the Mini Z single item measure (top 3 choices = burnout). Quantitative analyses utilized multilevel logistic regression; qualitative analysis used inductive and deductive methods. These data informed a conceptual model.Key resultsOf 58,408 HCWs (median response rate 32%), 1022 were hospital-based clinicians (906 (89%) physicians; 449 (44%) female; 469 (46%) White); 46% of these hospital-based clinicians reported burnout. Work overload was associated with almost 5 times the odds of burnout (OR 4.9, 95% CIs 3.67, 6.85, p < 0.001), and those with anxiety or depression had 4 times the odds of burnout (OR 4.2, CIs 3.21, 7.12, p < 0.001), while those feeling valued had half the burnout odds (OR 0.43, CIs 0.31, 0.61, p < 0.001). Regression models estimated 42% of burnout variance was explained by these variables. In open-ended comments, leadership support was helpful, with "great leadership" represented by transparency, regular updates, and opportunities to ask questions.ConclusionsIn this national study of hospital medicine, 2 variables were significantly related to burnout (workload and mental health) while two variables (feeling valued and leadership) were likely mitigators. These variables merit further investigation as means of reducing burnout in hospital medicine.
| S-EPMC10713906 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionTraditionally, research institutions have valued individual achievements such as principal investigator and lead authorship status as primary indicators in the academic promotions process. However, the scientific process increasingly requires collaboration by teams of researchers across multiple disciplines, sometimes including experts outside academia, often referred to as "team science." We sought to determine whether there is agreement about what constitutes team science at our academic institution and whether current promotion processes sufficiently incentivize faculty participation in team science.MethodsWe conducted 20 qualitative interviews with academic leaders (N = 24) at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) who supervise faculty promotions processes. Participants were asked to share their definitions of team science and the extent to which faculty receive credit for engaging in these activities during the promotions process. A subset of participants also completed a brief survey in which they ranked the importance of participation in team science relative to other factors that are traditionally valued in the promotions process. Interview data were examined by two analysts using structural coding. Descriptive analyses were conducted of survey responses.ResultsThough team science is valued at UCSF, definitions of team science and the approach to assigning credit for team science in academic promotions processes varied widely. Participants suggested opportunities to bolster support for team science.ConclusionsEfforts to define and provide transparent faculty incentives for team science should be prioritized at institutions, like UCSF, seeking to advance faculty engagement in collaborative research.
| S-EPMC10880000 | biostudies-literature