Dataset Information

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment of PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line therapy for patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

Eligible randomized trials were identified following the systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database from January 2000 to June 2022.

Results

Seven trials involving 1132 patients with PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous NSCLC were included. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy showed significantly superior objective response rate (ORR) compared with chemotherapy alone (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69-4.65). Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy also significantly prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.55-0.74, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.82, p < 0.001) of patients with PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous NSCLC compared to chemotherapy alone. In terms of ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy were at higher risk than chemotherapy alone (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.47-2.05).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggested that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy yielded a better ORR, PFS, and OS, and a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events as the first-line therapy for patients with PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative nonsquamous advanced NSCLC in comparison to chemotherapy alone. A rational treatment protocol should be selected according to the individual condition of the patients.

SUBMITTER: Chai Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9663683 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment of PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chai Yue Y Wu Xinyu X Zou Yifeng Y Zhang Xue X Bai Hua H Dong Mei M Duan Jianchun J

Thoracic cancer 20220926 22

<h4>Background</h4>This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line therapy for patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Eligible randomized trials were identified following the systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and China Knowledge Res ...[more]

PMID: 36168110

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAdvanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents significant therapeutic challenges, particularly in Asian populations, which exhibit distinct biological and genetic characteristics. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has emerged as a promising approach; however, its efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone remains under investigation. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy (PIC) versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced TNBC in Asian patients.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed across six databases for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only studies comparing the outcomes of PIC versus chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced TNBC, including subgroup analyses of Asian populations, were included. Data were pooled to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), responses, and safety profiles.ResultsA total of 1041 patients from five phase 3 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Compared to chemotherapy alone, PIC therapy significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74 [0.62, 0.88], P = 0.0008). No significant difference was observed in OS (HR: 0.78 [0.55, 1.12], P = 0.18), although a slight trend favoring PIC therapy was noted. Among PD-L1-positive patients, both OS (HR: 0.62 [0.44, 0.86], P = 0.005) and PFS (HR: 0.66 [0.50, 0.86], P = 0.003) were significantly improved in the PIC group. The PIC group also exhibited a substantially higher OS rate at 12-36 months and a higher PFS rate at 6-30 months. However, the incidence of immune-related AEs (irAEs) (risk ratio [RR]: 1.69 [1.33, 2.15], P < 0.0001) and grade 3-5 irAEs (RR: 3.11 [1.59, 6.10], P = 0.001) was significantly higher in the PIC group. The most common irAEs in the PIC group were hypothyroidism (14.40%), dermatitis (10.00%), and infusion reactions (8.85%). Both treatment groups exhibited similar response rates and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).ConclusionsIn Asian patients with advanced TNBC, PIC significantly improved survival compared to chemotherapy alone. Although the combination therapy was associated with a higher incidence of irAEs, its clinical benefits support its use as a viable treatment option for this population.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024622428.

Project description:Purpose: To investigate the impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, oncogenic mutations, and clinical characteristics on survival after treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies versus chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: This meta-analysis included randomized trials comparing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies with chemotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) for the trial population and prespecified subgroups were extracted. We calculated pooled estimates of treatment efficacy using the fixed-effects or random-effects model when appropriate. All statistical tests were two sided. Results: Seven trials involving 3871 patients were included. The pooled results showed that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy significantly prolonged OS (HR: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.84) and PFS (HR: 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.99) compared to chemotherapy. OS benefit from immunotherapy were observed in all PD-L1 expression subgroups (negative: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.93; weak-positive: HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; strong-positive: HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.78). Strong-positive PD-L1 expression showed a trend towards more benefit compared to weak-positive PD-L1 expression (interaction P = 0.08). KRAS mutant (HR: 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.93), EGFR wild-type (HR: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.87) and smoker (HR: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.83) subgroups achieved significant OS benefit from immunotherapy compared to corresponding subgroups. Survival benefit to immunotherapy was not significantly associated with histology, CNS metastases, age, gender and performance status. Conclusion: This study confirmed that treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 improves overall survival compared with chemotherapy. Benefit was seen, regardless of PD-L1 expression levels; however, PD-L1 strong-positive patients trended to have greatest benefit. Patients with a KRAS mutant or EGFR wild-type tumor have improved survival benefit from immunotherapy compared with KRAS wild-type or EGFR mutant NSCLC, respectively.

Project description:BackgroundImmunochemotherapy has become a new treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).AimsWe aimed to study the clinical efficacy and toxicity of immunochemotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 compared with chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced ESCC, focusing on analyzing the influence of PD-L1 expression level.Methods and resultsFive randomized controlled trials comparing PD-1/PD-L1 based immunochemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for advanced ESCC were included. We extracted efficacy data (objective response rate [ORR], disease control rate [DCR], overall survival [OS] rate, progression-free survival [PFS] rate) and safety data (treatment-related adverse events, treatment-related mortality) and performed meta-analyses. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the ORR and DCR of immunochemotherapy increased by 2.05 times and 1.54 times, respectively. Overall, patients receiving immunochemotherapy had a significant long-term survival advantage (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.61-0.75; PFS: HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.55, 0.70, respectively). Even with PD-L1 tumor proportion score <1%, immunochemotherapy also showed a significant survival advantage (OS: HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.93; PFS: HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.69, respectively). However, for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) < 1, the survival advantage of immunochemotherapy was not significant (OS: HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.42-1.90; PFS: HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.47-1.08, respectively). The toxicity of immunochemotherapy was higher than that of chemotherapy alone, but there was no statistical difference in treatment-related mortality (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% CI 0.67-1.83).ConclusionIn this study, treatment-related mortality was similar between immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy. PD-1/PD-L1 based immunochemotherapy significantly could improve survival outcomes in patients with advanced ESCC. For patients with CPS <1, the survival advantage of immunochemotherapy was not significant compared with chemotherapy.

Dataset Information

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment of PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment of PD-L1-negative and driver-gene-negative advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets