Is justice grounded? How expertise shapes conceptual representation of institutional concepts.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Using abstract concepts is a hallmark of human cognition. While multiple kinds of abstract concepts exist, they so far have been conceived as a unitary kind in opposition to concrete ones. Here, we focus on Institutional concepts, like justice or norm, investigating their fine-grained differences with respect to other kinds of abstract and concrete concepts, and exploring whether their representation varies according to individual proficiency. Specifically, we asked experts and non-experts in the legal field to evaluate four kinds of concepts (i.e., institutional, theoretical, food, artefact) on 16 dimensions: abstractness-concreteness; imageability; contextual availability; familiarity; age of acquisition; modality of acquisition; social valence; social metacognition; arousal; valence; in
SUBMITTER: Villani C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9674748 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA