A comparison of drying methods on the quality for bryophyte molecular specimens collected in the field.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: A major challenge in extracting high-quality DNA from bryophytes is the treatment of bryophyte material in the field. The existing and commonly used treatment methods in the field have several shortcomings. Natural drying methods can lead to DNA breaks. In addition, it is highly cumbersome to carry large quantities of silica gel in the field due to its weight and high risk of contamination among samples. In this study, we explored more convenient drying methods to treat bryophyte specimens and promote more efficient DNA recovery. The quantity and quality of genomic DNA extracted from every bryophyte species using different drying methods, including hot-air drying methods (150°C, 80°C, and 40°C), natural drying method, and silica gel drying method, were measured. Spectrophotometry, electrop
SUBMITTER: Shen F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9683613 | biostudies-literature | 2022
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA