Dataset Information

Opinion seeking behaviour of healthcare providers in ambulatory cardiovascular care in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Healthcare providers' inclination to seek or lead other providers' opinions on clinical topics may influence healthcare practices, particularly regarding their alignment across different providers in controversial domains. This study aimed to explore opinion-seeking behaviours of general practitioners and their impacts on clinical opinions in ambulatory cardiovascular care in Germany.

Methods

Between 2019 and 2021, we performed a written survey in two samples of general practitioners and one sample of self-employed cardiologists in three German states. The general practitioners were asked to identify a person they deemed influential on their views on cardiovascular conditions. Their self-perceived opinion leadership and opinion seeking behaviours were then measured, using a validated 12-item-questionnaire. General practitioners and cardiologists were requested to indicate their agreement with three potentially controversial aspects of cardiovascular ambulatory care. Potential impacts on the general practitioners' views, including local cardiologists' opinions, were examined using multi-level linear regression models.

Results

A total of 129 general practitioners and 113 cardiologists returned the questionnaire. 68.50% of general practitioners named an opinion leader, mainly cardiologists outside of their practice. General practitioners perceived themselves as opinion seeking and as opinion leading at the same time. Views on the presented controversial topics were mixed among both general practitioners and cardiologists. Self-reported opinion leadership behaviour of general practitioners was associated with their views on one of the three topics. No such associations were found for opinion seeking behaviours and the views of local cardiologists.

Conclusion

While most general practitioners named a cardiovascular opinion leader and saw themselves as opinion seeking regarding cardiovascular issues, they simultaneously perceived themselves as opinion leading, suggesting that opinion leadership and opinion seeking are not mutually exclusive concepts. The views of local cardiologists were not associated with the general practitioners' view, suggesting that local medical specialists do not necessarily influence the surrounding opinion seekers' views per se.

Trial registration

We registered the study prospectively on 7 November 2019 at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, www.drks.de ) under ID no. DRKS00019219.

SUBMITTER: Hennrich P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9686109 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Opinion seeking behaviour of healthcare providers in ambulatory cardiovascular care in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Hennrich Patrick P Arnold Christine C Traulsen Pia P Peters-Klimm Frank F Wensing Michel M

BMC health services research 20221123 1

<h4>Background</h4>Healthcare providers' inclination to seek or lead other providers' opinions on clinical topics may influence healthcare practices, particularly regarding their alignment across different providers in controversial domains. This study aimed to explore opinion-seeking behaviours of general practitioners and their impacts on clinical opinions in ambulatory cardiovascular care in Germany.<h4>Methods</h4>Between 2019 and 2021, we performed a written survey in two samples of general ...[more]

PMID: 36419070

Similar Datasets

Project description:AbstractIntroductionIn Afghanistan, remarkable achievements have been made in improving access to healthcare and health outcomes since the introduction of essential healthcare packages. Nonetheless, sociodemographic and geographical inequities persist, and out-of-pocket expenditures are high. This study investigates the client and provider determinants of access to care that affect treatment-seeking behaviour in 2018.MethodsSecondary data analysis using data on treatment-seeking behaviour in public and private healthcare from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018 was combined with data on the quality of public healthcare facilities from a national healthcare facility assessment of the same year. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore associations between client characteristics and accessibility of public healthcare facilities, and treatment-seeking behaviour and choice of public versus private healthcare provider.ResultsThe results suggest that the odds of seeking treatment are lowest among the rural poor. The odds of treatment-seeking and choosing a public healthcare provider are higher for pregnancy-related health needs but lower for chronic conditions. Affordability of healthcare was associated with lower odds of treatment-seeking (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) and using private healthcare providers (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99). Increased satisfaction with opening hours (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05) and availability of a female nurse or doctor (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04) in public health facilities, and a higher level of trust in healthcare provider (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06) were associated with higher odds of using public healthcare.ConclusionAfghanistan's public healthcare system is vital in providing care to the economically disadvantaged and managing infectious diseases and maternal health problems. The private sector plays a dominant role, particularly for those illnesses not covered under the essential healthcare packages. The study suggests opportunities for the public healthcare system to alleviate financial barriers to healthcare access and broaden its service offerings to encompass the management of chronic illnesses.

Project description:BackgroundChronic cardiovascular diseases demand continuous care from general practitioners and medical specialists. Especially in fragmented healthcare systems, such as in Germany, a large body of research is devoted to the improvement of care continuity. Meanwhile, measuring continuity of care itself has been a challenge due to the absence of validated instruments. In 2011, the Dutch Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ) was developed and validated to measure continuity of care across care settings from the patients' perspectives in the Netherlands. Its applicability in other countries and health systems, however, has rarely been tested. We therefore aimed at assessing the applicability of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire to the German health care context. METHODS: We translated and applied the original NCQ to an ambulatory cardiovascular care setting in Germany. Qualitative interview data and quantitative survey data on our adaptation were collected from patients in 27 general practices within the German states of Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate. Qualitative data on understandability and clearness of the questionnaire was obtained using semi-structured telephone interviews and think aloud-protocols. Quantitative data was obtained through an anonymous written questionnaire containing the translated NCQ items to assess applicability of our translation. We performed confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses based on the original NCQ-structure mapped to general practitioners and an aggregated analysis of general practitioners and cardiologists combined.ResultsA total of 6 patients participated in the interviews and a total of 435 patients participated in the written survey. The interviews showed that, overall, patients had little difficulties comprehending and answering to our translation of the NCQ. The confirmatory factor analyses then showed that the structure of the original NCQ with 12 items and 3 latent factors can also be found in the German context. However, a simpler 2-factor-structure would also fit well with the data.ConclusionA German translation of the NCQ yielded a factor structure comparable to the original version and proved to be understandable for patients.Trial registrationThe project underlying the study was registered on November 7, 2019 in the German Clinical Trials Register ( www.drks.de ) under ID: DRKS00019219.

Project description:Background: Due to the huge number of drugs available and the rapid growth and change in drug information, healthcare professionals, especially physicians, frequently require reliable, easily accessible, rapid, and accurate reference sources to obtain the necessary drug information. Several sources of information are available for physicians to use and select from; however, the information-seeking behaviour of healthcare providers is varied, and this process can be challenging. Objectives: In this study, Jordanian physicians were approached to evaluate the drug information they require, the sources of information they use, the perceived credibility of the sources, and the challenges they face when searching for the most accurate and current information about drugs. Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to practising physicians in Jordan using a convenience sampling method (purposive sampling followed by snowball sampling) regardless of their speciality, age, gender, seniority, or place of employment. Results: Three hundred and eighty physicians participated in the study. Most participants responded that they performed drug information searches on a weekly (155, 40.8%) or a daily basis (150, 39.5%). The drug-related information that physicians most frequently searched for concerned dosage regimens and adverse drug events. The majority of surveyed doctors (97.9%) reported using online websites to acquire drug information; UpToDate®, Medscape and Drugs.com were the most frequently used online databases, although many participants did not consider online sources to be the most reliable source. The most prevalent and recurrent challenges encountered concerned an inability to access subscription-only journals and websites (56.6%), difficulty identifying trusted and credible sources (41.8%) and the enormous number of available sources (35.3%). However, these challenges were less of a problem for physicians who currently work or have previously worked in academia (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that Jordanian physicians frequently use online websites to look for drug information and all doctors face challenges throughout this process particularly those with no experience in academia. This suggests that being in academia makes the process of information-seeking easier which highlights the need for academics to transfer their knowledge and experience to their non-academic colleagues and the upcoming generations of physicians.

Dataset Information

Opinion seeking behaviour of healthcare providers in ambulatory cardiovascular care in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

Opinion seeking behaviour of healthcare providers in ambulatory cardiovascular care in Germany: a cross-sectional study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets